Presentation on theme: "The voice of Education within the Intercultural Ethical-Political project Anna Maria Passaseo University of Messina."— Presentation transcript:
The voice of Education within the Intercultural Ethical-Political project Anna Maria Passaseo University of Messina
In order to understand the intercultural question today, it necessary read it into the wide design which sees the commitment, from more than twenty years and in different ways, of western democracies in facing the migratory phenomena.
The contemporary migratory phenomena put in question the policies and the organizational forms of democratic nation states what Abdelmalek Sayad defined as thought of State, i.e. the whole of the categories through which a State defines as natural the national borders that separate citizens from others.
To Sayad, immigration disturbs It disturbs when induces to ask if it is really natural make the confrontation among cultures a matter of power. It disturbs when it leads to ask if the western cultural model can tolerate societies which are based on different organizational principles. It disturbs when, in recognizing and defending democracy, it arises the risk that democracy can fail, since it has to be founded on universally shared rules, that cultural relativity put in question.
It is evident that: the intercultural questions involves first of all the political sphere, as need to re-negotiate the democratic living agreement through a participated process of re-definition of shared values
But, on Political level We saw the opening of a debate around critical questions not solved yet: How to satisfy the multiple demands of citizenship? How to understand needs of communitarian rights and individual rights? How to organize a new social contract to reach a new overlapping consensus?
Linked to the Political question is the Ethical one On what principles is it possible to base the living together? Still there are open questions: Is it right to impose an ethic? Is it right to think of an universal ethic? If we all agree that we have to pursue the good, how can we define what is good and what is evil? Is ethic a deduction of principles or something that is lived?
According to Raimundo Panikkar The only form of ethic which can have strength today is an intercultural ethic, meaning by this a procedure through which arriving to orientations of value by dialogue. But, are we able to do it?
This question leads to the Educational level because of the presence of foreign students in the schools; because of the awareness that a pacific living among groups and communities could not be a spontaneous consequence of the natural human attitude to sociality. Education has been the first to welcome the challenge of multicultural societies, for two main reasons:
So Intercultural education was born as a project of control and intervention on a reality that could be led within paths determined by reason and human ideals, coming from that humanity that hardly fought to affirm precise values explicitly fixed: freedom, equality, dignity, justice, solidarity, to mention some of them, as a defence of liberal democratic societies.
A project aimed especially at fighting all those psychological blocks that obstacle the relation with others: fear of loosing ones own identity; defensive closures; prejudices and stereotypes.
However today we cannot say that the intercultural question has lost its project dimension becoming a stable aspect of society. On the contrary, everyday we register phenomena of new racism and intolerance towards diversities at all levels, restrictions of rights to immigrants and incapacity in managing autonomously simple intercultural conflicts.
Thats because In Italy what we could realize was the so- called adaptive agreement: an agreement that, especially in the context of work and citizenship, proposes a logic of adaptation. The immigrant has the right to preserve his own culture of belonging if, at the same time, adopts the culture of the host country.
In this scenery Education offers more space to negotiation, to the possibility of relation between different cultures that share the same goal of reaching an agreement through the participation of all subjects.
But Any process of negotiation between different cultures requires specific capacities and attitudes, of openmindness and dialogue, that still are not present in our western societies. So it is right on this capacities that education is called to intervene, especially in this new historical phase, characterized by the presence of the so-called second generations.
Education is called to cultivate those capacities which can prepare subjects to create the space of the meeting, a space in which it is not necessary to abandon ones own cultural luggage, and where it is possible to cooperate with others in order to analyze and solve common problems, in conditions of equality.
Living in democratic, pluralistic and multicultural societies means helping the gradual inclusion of new subjects and groups in the socio- cultural-political scene. Once they are recognized in the dominant cultural, these groups could bring new perspectives and new proposals of social organization only if they will be able to coordinate each other on the basis of practical needs and problems.
Bibliography AA.VV., Etiche mondiali. La nascita di una coscienza planetaria, Cittadella, Assisi 1996. Cambi F., Incontro e dialogo, Carocci, Roma 2006. Crespi F., Segatori R., Multiculturalismo e democrazia, Donzelli, Roma 1996. Pearce B. W., Comunicazione e condizione umana, trad. it., Franco Angeli, Milano 1993. Rawls J., Giustizia come equità. Una riformulazione, trad. it., Feltrinelli, Milano 2006 . Sayad A., L'immigrazione o i paradossi dell'alterità. L'illusione del provvisorio, Ombre Corte 2008. Taylor C., Habermas J., Multiculturalismo. Lotte per il riconoscimento, trad. it., Feltrinelli, Milano 1998. Zanfrini L., Cittadinanze. Appartenenza e diritti nella società dellimmigrazione, Laterza, Roma-Bari 2007