1. Supported by www.res-h-policy.eu WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options Methodology, detailed working plan, distribution of work 2. Project Meeting London, 10/11 March 2009 Veit Bürger, Öko-Institut e.V.

2. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu2 Tasks Task 4.1: Description of selected support options Task 4.2: Qualitative assessment of selected support options Task 4.3: Stakeholder Dialogue I Task 4.4: Assessment of the effectiveness and economic efficiency of selected support options Task 4.5: Stakeholder Dialogue II Task 4.6: Policy recommendations and implementation strategies ------------------------------------------------------------------ Task 6.2: National Dissemination Conferences

3. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu3 Task 4.1: Description of selected support options (1) for each of the 7 target countries/regions 3-5 RES-H/C support instrument options will be selected and described in detail the selection of the support options will be based on the provisional indication of the effectiveness of different policy options subject to task 2.2 (= policy options report D4) the architecture of the selected instruments will be designed as to fit to the national context in which the instruments will be embedded description of instruments will include all major processes underlying the support system as well as the detailed institutional set-up (Which institutions will be involved? What is their specific role?) outcome (instrument descriptions) will be part of D9 (part 1 of D9)

4. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu4 Task 4.1: Description of selected support options (2)

5. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu5 Task 4.2: Qualitative assessment of selected support options (1) for each target country/region each of the selected instrument options from task 4.1 will be qualitatively assessed against a variety of different criteria, including ─stakeholder views ─support of long-term perspectives (-> technology split) ─level of investment security ─administrative/organisational synergies with other policy instruments analysis of the interaction with related policies (e.g. buildings standards, CHP) qualitative criteria will be provided in form of a working document (D10) main findings of this task will be added to D9 (part 2 of D9)

6. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu6 Task 4.2: Qualitative assessment of selected support options (2)

7. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu7 Task 4.3: Stakeholder Dialogue I (1) main findings of task 4.2 will be subject to a stakeholder dialogue elements of stakeholder dialogue: ─stakeholder consultation (methodology: email questionnaire, interviews,…);  20 responses required!  documentation in form of concise synthesis reports (D11) ─consultation workshop in each target country/region (documentation D12);  15 external participants! selection of 3-5 support instrument options from tasks 4.1/4.2 will be narrowed down to 2 instruments these instruments will then undergo a profound quantitative analysis (task 4.4)

8. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu8 Task 4.3: Stakeholder Dialogue I (2)

9. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu9 Task 4.4: Assessment of the effectiveness and economic efficiency of selected support options carrying out a detailed assessment of the effectiveness and economical efficiency for each target country/region and each of the 2 instruments identified in task 4.3 ─development of the technology split ─costs: quantification of the direct impact on the state budgets + transaction costs (in particular those resulting on the authorities' side) ─benefits in terms of reduced GHG emissions, growth in RES-H/C capacities and avoided fuel costs, direct impact on employment (no full macroeconomic assessment!) methodologies: amongst others INVERT (building sector), detailed methodology discussion at PM3 results will be documented in D13

10. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu10 Task 4.5: Stakeholder Dialogue II organisation of consultation workshops in each target country/region on the effectiveness and economic efficiency of the 2 selected support options (documentation D14)  15 external participants per workshop!

11. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu11 Task 4.6: Policy recommendations and implementation strategies based on findings of tasks 4.2-4.5 selection of one support instrument for each target country/region development of policy recommendations and implementation strategies specifically designed for the target countries/regions (target group: policy sector) recommendations include ─the specific design of the proposed instrument embedded in a concise policy package (institutional set-up, governance structure) ─recommendations as to how to best adapt the new instrument to the existing policies which already address the RES-H/C sector development of implementation guidelines outcome: policy reports summarising policy recommendations and the corresponding implementation guidelines (D15)

12. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu12 Schedule for tasks 4.4 – 4.6

13. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu13

14. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu14 Role and contribution of partners (1) Oeko ─WP Coordinator ─responsible for the working paper on qualitative assessment criteria for RES-H/C support options (D10) ─presenting at first consultation workshop per target country/region on RES-H/C policy implementation experience in DE EEG, ESV, CRES, LEI, ECN, KAPE, UNEXE ─responsible for policy processes in target countries/regions (tasks 4.1-4.6) ─responsible for organising the stakeholder consultation + consultation workshops in the target countries/regions ─responsible for data collection for Invert modelling (task 4.4) ─jointly with EEG and Fraunhofer ISI responsible for cost benefit analysis (task 4.4)

15. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu15 Role and contribution of partners (2) EEG ─adaptation and application of the simulation model INVERT (task 4.4) ECN ─responsible for the task 4.4 assessment for the non-building sector Fraunhofer ISI ─contributing to working paper on qualitative assessment criteria for RES-H/C support options, adaptation and application of the simulation model INVERT (task 4.4) ULUND ─presenting at first consultation workshop per target country/region on the experience with the implementation of DH systems in SE ─contributing to working paper on qualitative assessment criteria for RES-H/C support options

16. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu16

17. WP4: Assessment of national RES-H/C Policy Options www.res-h-policy.eu17 Allocation of hours