1. Assessment at Southampton
Presentation of Gradebook and E-assignment
Please use the dd month yyyy format for the date for example 11 January The main title can be one or two lines long.
Liv Støbseth-Brown 03 August 2011

2. Assessment at Southampton
Introduction
Enhanced Gradebook (EGB) Demonstration – Will Eagle
E-assignment Demonstration – Peter Gibbs
Use divider pages to break up your presentation into logical sections and to provide a visual break for the viewer. The title can be one or two lines long.

4. AAS - Governance

5. AAS : Faculty Representation on POB
Business and Law - Jenny Atkins, Tim Metcalf, Gill Sivyour,
Engineering & Environment - Catherine Hann, Ian Williams
Health Sciences -Claire Atkins, Rosalynd Jowett
Humanities - Lynn Godfrey
Medicine - Susan Ponsford, Sally Skidmore, Sally Rushworth
Natural and Environmental - Jeremy Hinks, Mandy Pervin
Physical & Applied Science - Andy Gravell, Dain Mead
Social & Human - Aiden Gregg, Peter Smith
Charts should range left and to the bottom of the page

6. Enhanced Gradebook provides features such as….
Anonymous marking
Processes to support reassessment
Audit of how composite marks and grades are calculated from components and subcomponents
Customisable rules (e.g. when and for which population of students assessment and reassessment grades display on the web).
Customisable web pages (e.g. layout changes, removal of unused fields)
Enhanced INB form to allow administrative users to modify marks in Academic History
A rollback from Academic History function

7. E-assignment

8. Proposed Institutional System

9. Features Multiple documents can be submitted
Documents types specified (Word, PDF, Excel, SPSS…….)
Virus Checking
Academic Integrity declaration and Checks (TurnitIn)
Specify dates for:
Start & End of submission period
Extension
Completion of Marking
Release of Marks

10. Features continued
Percentages or Graded Criteria (converted to percentages)
Makers can upload documents for student
Export of Marks and submitted work
Roles: Administrator, Marker, Moderator, External Examiner
Marking approaches: Single, Double, Blind, 1st marker then 2nd marker
Notification of Penalties

11. Benefits
For Students
access to all assignment criteria and marking descriptors
consistency of submission, marking and feedback, 24/7
For Markers
access to assignments online (?no physical copies)
very similar to peer reviewing
For Quality Assurance
transparency of assignment criteria and marking descriptors
consistent process of marking & easy access for externals

12. Benefits For the Institution
Efficiency of administrative processes, faster turn rounds
Harmonisation of assessment processes across the Institution
Quality Enhancement
Analysis of assessment at the criteria level
Performance feedback to markers leading to improved marker commitment

13. Eassignment Links
Humanities Student example