# Interpreting Run Charts and Shewhart Charts

## Presentation on theme: "Interpreting Run Charts and Shewhart Charts"— Presentation transcript:

Interpreting Run Charts and Shewhart Charts

Agenda Features of Run Charts Interpreting Run Charts
A quick mention of variation Features of Shewhart Charts Interpreting Shewhart Charts

Displaying Key Measures over Time - Run Chart
Data displayed in time order Time is along X axis Result along Y axis Centre line = median One “dot” = one sample of data

Three Uses of Run Charts in Quality Work
Determine if change is an improvement Median 429 The Data Guide, p 3-18 4

Three Uses of Run Charts in Quality Work
2. Determine if improvement is sustained Median 429 The Data Guide, p 3-18 5

Three Uses of Run Charts in Quality Work
3. Make process performance visible Median 429 The Data Guide, p 3-18 6

How Do We Analyze a Run Chart?
Visual analysis first If pattern is not clear, then apply probability based rules The Data Guide, p 3-10 7

Non-Random Signals on Run Charts
A Trend 5 or more A Shift: 6 or more Too many or too few runs An astronomical data point Evidence of a non-random signal if one or more of the circumstances depicted by these four rules are on the run chart. The first three rules are violations of random patterns and are based on a probability of less than 5% chance of occurring just by chance with no change. The Data Guide, p 3-11 8

Source: Swed, Frieda S. and Eisenhart, C
Source: Swed, Frieda S. and Eisenhart, C. (1943) “Tables for Testing Randomness of Grouping in a Sequence of Alternatives.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics. Vol. XIV, pp , Tables II and III. The Data Guide, p 3-14 9

Trend? Note: 2 same values – only count one

Shift? note: values on median don’t make or break a shift

Shift?

Interpretation? There is a signal of a non-random pattern
There is less than 5 % chance that we would see this pattern if something wasn’t going on, i.e. if there wasn’t a real change

Plain Language Interpretation?
There is evidence of improvement – the chance we would see a “shift” like this in data if there wasn’t a real change in what we were doing is less than 5%

Two few or too many runs. - 1. bring out the table 2
Two few or too many runs?- 1. bring out the table 2. how many points do we have (not on median?) 3. how many runs do we have (cross median +1) 4. what is the upper and lower limit?

Two few or too many runs. -. new slide 1. bring out the table 2
Two few or too many runs?- **new slide 1. bring out the table 2. how many points do we have how many runs do we have (cross median +1) what is the upper and lower limit?

Two few runs? Plain language interpretation
There is evidence of improvement – our data only crosses the median line twice – three runs. If it was just random variation, we would expect to see more up and down.

What if we had too many runs? Plain language interpretation
There is evidence of a non-random pattern. There is a pattern to the way the data rises and falls above and below the median. Something systematically different. Should investigate and maybe plot on separate run charts.

Astronomical Data Point?

Who is using run charts?

Understanding Variation
Walter Shewhart (1891 – 1967) W. Edwards Deming ( ) The Pioneers of Understanding Variation

Understanding Variation: Intended and Unintended Variation
Intended variation is an important part of effective, patient-centered health care.   Unintended variation is due to changes introduced into healthcare process that are not purposeful, planned or guided. Walter Shewhart focused his work on this unintended variation. He found that reducing unintended variation in a process usually resulted in improved outcomes and lower costs. (Berwick 1991) Health Care Data Guide, p. 107

Shewhart’s Theory of Variation
Common Causes—those causes inherent in the system over time, affect everyone working in the system, and affect all outcomes of the system Common cause of variation Chance cause Stable process Process in statistical control Special Causes—those causes not part of the system all the time or do not affect everyone, but arise because of specific circumstances Special cause of variation Assignable cause Unstable process Process not in statistical control Could insert “a” game Health Care Data Guide, p. 108

Health Care Data Guide, p. 113
Shewhart Charts The Shewhart chart is a statistical tool used to distinguish between variation in a measure due to common causes and variation due to special causes (Most common name is a control chart, more descriptive would be learning charts or system performance charts) Health Care Data Guide, p. 113

Control Charts – what features are different than a run chart?

Control Charts/Shewhart Charts upper and lower control limits
to detect special cause variation Extend limits to predict future performance Not necessarily ordered by time advanced application of SPC – is there something different between systems 26

Health Care Data Guide, p. 114
Example of Shewhart Chart for Unequal Subgroup Size Health Care Data Guide, p. 114

Who has been using control charts?

Adapted from Health Care Data Guide, p. 151 & QI Charts Software
Some things such as UTIs can be U chart… you can get two UTIs in one case. Note for Kimberly Adapted from Health Care Data Guide, p. 151 & QI Charts Software

Health Care Data Guide, p. 116
Note: Only for constant subgroup size Note: A point exactly on the centerline does not cancel or count towards a shift Health Care Data Guide, p. 116 31

Special cause: point outside the limits

Special cause 2 out of 3 consecutive points in outer third of limits or beyond

Common Cause

Case Study #1a

Case Study #1b Percent of cases with urinary tract infection

Case Study #1c Percent of cases with urinary tract infection

Case Study #1d Percent of cases with urinary tract infection

Case Study #1e Percent of cases with urinary tract infection

Case Study #1f Percent of cases with urinary tract infection

Case Study #2a Percent of patients with Death or Serious Morbidity who are >= 65 years of age

Case Study #2b Percent of patients with Death or Serious Morbidity who are >= 65 years of age

Case Study #2c Percent of patients with Death or Serious Morbidity who are >= 65 years of age

Case Study #2d Percent of patients with Death or Serious Morbidity who are >= 65 years of age

References BCPSQC Measurement Report Langley GJ, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP (2009) The Improvement Guide (2nd ed). Provost L, Murray S (2011) The Health Care Data Guide. Berwick, Donald M, Controlling Variation in Health Care: A Consultation with Walter Shewhart, Medical Care, December, 1991, Vol. 29, No 12, page ****CHELSEA, can you add Lloyd’s run chart article reference from R2? Associates in Process Improvement website