Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The UNEV Pipeline Project: An Update

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The UNEV Pipeline Project: An Update"— Presentation transcript:

1 The UNEV Pipeline Project: An Update
Results of data recovery investigations David T. Yoder, John C. Ravesloot, Brandon M. Gabler, and William D. Self William Self Associates, Inc.

2 In 2010 the Holly Corporation is scheduled to construct the UNEV pipeline, a 400-mile-long project that will carry liquid petroleum products from a refinery in Woods Cross in north Salt Lake City to northeast Las Vegas. In 2009, as part of the mitigation effort for UNEV, William Self Associates performed phased data recovery at 11 prehistoric and 4 historic sites along the pipeline’s route. The preliminary results from two of the more interesting prehistoric sites (42MD3014 and 42MD3285, both near Delta, Utah) are presented. A human behavioral ecology framework is used to investigate issues related to site use and occupation.

3 UNEV Research Themes Hypothesis 1: Archaic groups practiced a high degree of residential mobility Hypothesis 2: Formative groups practiced a low degree of residential mobility Hypothesis 3: Late Prehistoric groups practiced a high degree of residential mobility Hypothesis 4: According to Madsen and Simms (1998), Fremont groups both farmed and foraged full-time, and switched between these strategies Expectations: Elements of Fremont material culture associated with characteristics of both high and low residential mobility should be present Multiple types of Fremont complex sites should be present - some indicating long-term occupations associated with cultigens, others indicating foraging occupations Material culture should provide indications of connections between foragers and farmers during the Formative period Hypothesis 5: Wetlands environments were particularly productive, and therefore groups resided near them throughout prehistory

4 Overview of site, view to the east
42MD3014: Class III Results Site type: Artifact scatter - flaked stone Culture and period: Archaic, Formative, Late Prehistoric Diagnostic artifacts: One Gatecliff Contracting-stem point Description situated on low sand knoll on a flat plain, 2 miles north of Sevier River moderate-density lithic scatter of 50 flakes, represents core reduction 10 obsidian specimens collected for sourcing and hydration analyses 8 from Black Rock, 1 from Topaz Mountain, 1 from Wild Horse Canyon hydration rims suggest Archaic, Formative, and Late Prehistoric periods Overview of site, view to the east

5 42MD3014: Surface Material Class Count Elko Corner-notched point 1
Bifaces 10 Cores 4 Debitage 609 Snake Valley Gray sherd Sevier Gray sherd

6 42MD3014: Subsurface Material Class Count
Feature 1: Large basin-shaped depression Feature 2: Medium basin-shaped depression Feature 3: Brush structure or wikiup Feature 4: Medium pit Feature 5: Medium pit Material Class Count Projectile points (Elko Corner-notched fragment and an unknown fragment) 2 Bifaces 7 Debitage 1,398 Hammerstone 1 Ground stone Fremont plain gray sherds 110 Sevier Gray sherd Shell bead Faunal bone 53

7 Medium depression (Feature 2) post-excavation; view to the south

8 Wikiup (Feature 3) pre-excavation; view to the north
42MD3014 Wikiup (Feature 3) pre-excavation; view to the north

9 Wikiup (Feature 3) post-excavation; view to the east
42MD3014 Wikiup (Feature 3) post-excavation; view to the east

10 Medium pit (Feature 4) post-excavation; view to the south and down
42MD3014 Medium pit (Feature 4) post-excavation; view to the south and down

11 Medium pit (Feature 5) pre-excavation; view to the west and down
42MD3014 Medium pit (Feature 5) pre-excavation; view to the west and down

12 very dark gray, massive silt, wetland/paludal deposit
42MD3014: Absolute dating Beta Analytic Conventional Age Context 266330 4310 ± 40 B.P. (Cal 3020 to 2880 B.C.) Stratum IV very dark gray, massive silt, wetland/paludal deposit 266331 1110 ± 40 B.P. (Cal A.D. 870 to 1010) Feature 1, depression 266332 1150 ± 40 B.P. (Cal A.D. 780 to 980) TU 29, stratum 2, level 3, above Feature 3 266333 1000 ± 40 B.P. (Cal A.D. 980 to 1060) Feature 3, wikiup or brush structure 266334 Feature 4, medium pit

13 42MD3014 Summary 42MD3014 represents a moderate- to high-density, multicomponent habitation site surface assemblage 626 artifacts: debitage, cores, bifaces, ceramics, and an Elko Corner-notched point disturbed subsurface assemblage 1,723 artifacts: debitage, bifaces, projectile points, ground stone, ceramics, faunal bone, a hammerstone, a stone bead, and a piece of shell two pit features, two depressions, and a possible wikiup three features (Features 2, 3, 4) have clustering 14C dates wikiup absolute date (Cal A.D. 980 to 1060) is during the Formative/Fremont period wikiup represents short-term habitation flaked stone tool manufacture occurred food processing, evidenced by: ground stone faunal bone (cottontails, jackrabbits, small mammals, duck, and common teal) macrobotanical remains (pickleweed, cheno-am, bullrush, sunflower, dropseed, little barley grass, Indian rice grass, saltbush fruit)

14 Overview of site, view to the north
42MD3285: Class III Results Site Type: Artifact scatter - flaked stone, ceramics, FCR Culture and Period: Fremont Diagnostic Artifacts: Fremont Sevier Gray Description situated on broad, flat alluvial plain or terrace, one mile south of the Old River Bed extensive, diffuse artifact scatter 500+ Fremont Sevier Gray sherds visible on surface Overview of site, view to the north

15 42MD3285: Surface Material Class Count Bifaces 2 Unifaces 1 Debitage
451 Sevier Gray sherds 42 Snake Valley Gray sherds

16 42MD3285: Subsurface Material Class Count Parowan Basal-notched point
Feature 1: FCR concentration Feature 2: Artifact concentration Feature 3: FCR concentration Feature 4: FCR concentration Feature 5: Basin-shaped depression, possible wikiup Feature 7: FCR and ground stone concentration Not shown: Feature 6, a natural soil stain 42MD3285: Subsurface Material Class Count Parowan Basal-notched point 1 Bifaces Unifaces Hammerstone Debitage 254 Sevier Gray sherds 2 Ground stone 9 Faunal bone Mineral/Manuport 6

17 FCR concentration (Feature 1); view to the northeast
42MD3285 FCR concentration (Feature 1); view to the northeast

18 Possible wikiup (Feature 5) post-excavation, moistened for emphasis;
42MD3285 Possible wikiup (Feature 5) post-excavation, moistened for emphasis; view to the northwest

19 42MD3285: Absolute dating Beta Analytic Conventional Age Context
266335 1960 ± 40 B.P. (Cal 40 B.C. to Cal A.D. 120) Stratum III black, massive, sandy silt, wet meadow deposit 266336 1240 ± 40 B.P. (Cal A.D. 670 to 890) Stratum V, Trench 1 266337 1490 ± 40 B.P. (Cal A.D. 450 to 450, 460 to 480, 530 to 640) Feature 5, possible wikiup

20 42MD3285 Summary 42MD3285 represents a low- to moderate-density artifact scatter and possible habitation site surface assemblage 498 artifacts: debitage, a uniface, bifaces, and Sevier Gray and Snake Valley Gray ceramics multiple FCR and artifact concentrations disturbed subsurface assemblage 277 artifacts: debitage, a hammerstone, a uniface, a biface, a Parowan Basal-notched point, ground stone, Sevier Gray ceramics, faunal bone, and a manuport a possible wikiup absolute date of Cal A.D. 450 to 450, 460 to 480, 530 to 640 if a wikiup, it represents short-term habitation food processing, evidenced by: ground stone faunal bone (a rodent) macrobotanical remains (pickleweed, cheno-am, bullrush, Indian rice grass)

21 Conclusions Data gathered during Phase I data recovery from 15 sites are most useful for: contributing to knowledge of regional prehistoric occupation in Utah addressing research questions posed earlier in this presentation directed towards local and regional mobility and settlement patterns addressing some site-specific mobility questions Primary field work ended in October analysis of the large collection of artifacts and samples is in progress for example, preliminary analyses of the materials from 42MD3014 and 42MD3285 suggest that: lithic tool manufacture occurred, with little on-site core reduction there were multiple occupations, minimally during the Archaic and Formative/Fremont periods

22 Conclusions Many of the prehistoric sites failed to produce a lot of data, but: negative data are data nonetheless, and some of our historic sites are quite interesting, such as 42SL255, the subject of the next paper by Scott O'Mack Thanks to Holly Energy Partners and Sinclair Oil Corporation for providing the means to collect and disseminate this information, and the agency archaeologists who helped to facilitate it.


Download ppt "The UNEV Pipeline Project: An Update"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google