Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report (USR)

Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report (USR)
Human Resource Technician WOBC SHOW SLIDE: PREPARE PERSONNEL READINESS DATA FOR THE COMMANDER UNIT STATUS REPORT (USR) ADMINISTRATIVE DATA: Academic Hours/Methods 0 hr/5 min Introduction 5 hrs / 40 min Conference / Discussion 1 hr / 40 Min Practical Exercise 1 hr / 00 Min Test 0 hr/10 min Test Review 0 hr/5 min Summary 9 hrs / 00 Min Total Hours INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDANCE. Before presenting this lesson, instructors must thoroughly prepare by studying this lesson and identified reference material. Throughout this lesson, solicit from students the challenges they experienced in the current operational environment (OE) and what they did to resolve them. Encourage students to apply at least 1 of the 8 critical variables: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment and time. MOTIVATOR: As a human resources professional, one of your duties will be to prepare or consolidate the Unit Status Report (USR). You must be able to complete, proof, and consolidate USR information and submit this information to your higher headquarters. Although there is an automated system that computes the percentages, NetUSR, you must understand the entire USR process in order to provide sound recommendations to your commander. In addition, you must ensure that DA gets the most accurate information possible. At the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (OJCS) and Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) level, the USR identifies trends, indicates Army status, and helps leaders make decisions on how to allocate resources. Changing numbers to make the unit look better does not help achieve this mission or obtain needed resources. Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report (USR) A D J U T A N T G E N E R A L S C H O O L

Terminal Learning Objective
Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Reporting (USR) C O N D I T I O N A C T I O N S T A N D A R D SHOW SLIDE: TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE NOTE: Inform the students of the Terminal Learning Objective (TLO). SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. In a training environment, leaders must perform a risk assessment in accordance with DA PAM , Risk Management. Leaders will complete a DD Form 2977 DELIBERATE RISK ASSESMENT WORKSHEET during the planning and completion of each task and sub-task by assessing mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops and support available-time available and civil considerations, (METT-TC). Local policies and procedures must be followed during times of increased heat category in order to avoid heat related injury. Consider the work/rest cycles and water replacement guidelines IAW TRADOC Regulation RISK ASSESSMENT LEVEL. Low. ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT. Environmental protection is not just the law but the right thing to do. It is a continual process and starts with deliberate planning. Always be alert to ways to protect our environment during training and missions. In doing so, you will contribute to the sustainment of our training resources while protecting people and the environment from harmful effects. Refer to FM Environmental Considerations and GTA ENVIRONMENTAL- RELATED RISK ASSESSMENT. EVALUATION: You will be evaluated at the end of the block of instruction. Students must achieve a 70% to obtain a passing score. International Officers must achieve a 60%. INSTRUCTIONAL LEAD-IN. Understanding Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report’s relationship with other HR Core Competencies and Key Functions is critical to your success as an HR Professional. During this lesson we will examine personnel and medical readiness, USR policies and procedures and preparing and processing unit status reports. This lesson provides an opportunity to reinforce the following 21st Century Soldier Competencies: (1) The Army Profession (2) Professional Competence (3) Team Building (4) Adaptability (5) Lifelong Learning 21st Century Soldier Competencies are outlined in Appendix C of TRADOC Pamphlet (The U.S. Army Learning Concept for 2015) are general areas of competence or attributes required by Students and leaders to prevail in complex, uncertain environments. Together, they provide a foundation for operational adaptability.

C O N D I T I O N A C T I O N S T A N D A R D In a classroom environment, given access to AR 220-1, DA PAM 220-1, Army Directive (Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability), eMILPO Training Database, USR personnel and medical readiness data, and awareness of Operational Environment (OE) variables and actors. NOTE: See Slide #2 to inform students of the TLO requirements.

Met when students: Assess the personnel and medical readiness deployability standards of unit personnel. Review USR personnel readiness data and HQDA reporting policies. Calculate the unit’s overall Personnel Level (P-Level). C O N D I T I O N A C T I O N S T A N D A R D NOTE: See Slide #2 to inform students of the TLO requirements.

Human Resources Enduring Principles
COMPETENCY BASED PERFORMANCE ORIENTED ACCURACY - Attention to detail oriented - Understand the dynamics of data input to HR systems SYNCHRONIZATION Effectively aligned: Time, space, purpose, maximum readiness, and operational capabilities TIMELINESS - Relevant HR Info - Thorough analysis near real-time common operational picture RESPONSIVENESS - Right support to the right place at the right time - Resources, capabilities + info INTEGRATION - Tasks and functions - Systems and processes organizations - Unity of purpose + effort ANTICIPATION - Project requirements - Intuitive nature experience, knowledge + education based HR ENDURING PRINCIPLES HR support uses a competency-based and performance-oriented strategy guided by HR enduring principles that assure a higher quality, more diverse and ready Total Army enabled by effective HR systems and agile policies. HR leaders have a responsibility to not only understand the importance of their efforts and unit mission, but also the missions of all their supported and supporting units. To meet the challenges of current and future operations, leaders are guided by six interdependent enduring principles of HR support that must be thoughtfully weighted and applied during the planning, execution, and assessment of missions. These six principles are: Integration. Integration maximizes efficiency by joining all elements of HR support (tasks, functions, systems, processes, and organizations) with operations ensuring unity of purpose and effort to accomplish the mission. Anticipation. Anticipation relies on professional judgment resulting from experience, knowledge, education, intelligence, and intuition to foresee events and requirements in order to initiate the appropriate HR support. Responsiveness. Responsiveness is providing the right support to the right place at the right time. It is the ability to meet ever-changing requirements on short notice and to apply HR support to meet changing circumstances during current and future operations. It involves identifying, accumulating, and maintaining sufficient resources, capabilities, and relevant information to enable commanders to make rapid decisions. Synchronization. Synchronization is ensuring HR support operations are effectively aligned with military actions in time, space, and purpose to produce maximum relative readiness and operational capabilities at a decisive place and time. It includes ensuring the HR operational process is planned, executed, and assessed. Timeliness. Timeliness ensures decision makers have access to relevant HR information and analysis that support current and future operations. It also supports a near real-time common operational picture across all echelons of HR support. Accuracy. Accuracy of information impacts not only on decisions made by commanders, but impacts Soldiers and their Families. For Soldiers, accurate information impacts their careers, retention, compensation, promotions, and general well being. For Family members, accuracy of information is critical for next of kin (NOK) notification if a Soldier becomes a casualty. HR providers must understand the dynamic nature of HR system’s architecture and the fact that data input at the lowest level has direct impact on decisions being made at the highest level.

Human Resources (HR) Focus
Agile and Clear Policies Encompassing and flexible Effective HR Practices Streamlined, intuitive, stable, & predictable Competency-based Skills Align responsibilities, knowledge, skills, & attributes Outcome-oriented Actions The end drive the means Self-Development Competent and confident HR Leaders SHOW SLIDE : FOCUS of hr operations Meeting the goal of providing efficient and effective HR support relies on multi-functional HR leaders who focus their knowledge and skills in support of the Army’s most important asset – its people. Only those who think strategically and work collaboratively, while inspiring and leading Soldiers and civilians can achieve desired outcomes. In all areas, HR personnel should focus on the following: Agile and clear HR policies. HR policies must be clear, encompassing, and flexible enough to apply to the greatest number of personnel and address the widest range of circumstances. They must be adaptable enough to be able to guide and inform personnel in complex and changeable circumstances. Effective HR practices. HR practices that emanate from the policy-level should be streamlined, intuitive, and able to effect stable and predictable process results. Competency-based skills. HR personnel must be competent and able to accomplish HR core competencies and key functions. Competencies align the responsibilities, knowledge, skills and attributes needed to fulfill mission requirements. Outcome-oriented actions. In an environment that measures HR performance, the emphasis is on successful outcomes in fulfillment of mission priorities. While it is important to have effective HR processes and practices in place, it is critical that the ends drive the means. Self development. Self development is one of three domains of leader development and requires leaders to display discipline and a desire for excellence in lifelong learning. Using assessments, HR leaders must invest the time to become competent and confident in HR operations. FM 1-0 para 1-4

Human Resources (HR)Support
Core Competencies Subordinate Key Functions FM 1-0, CHP 1, FIG 1-1 HR CORE COMPETENCIES NOTE: Have students understand that we now have FOUR HR Core Competencies and that PA falls under the sub category of Man the Force.

Personnel and Medical Readiness Deployability Standards
SHOW SLIDE: PERSONNEL AND MEDICAL READINESS DEPLOYABILITY STANDARDS Learning Step / Activity 1. Assess the personnel and medical readiness deployability standards of unit personnel. Method of Instruction: DSL - Discussion Instructor to Student Ratio: 1:36 Time of Instruction: 50 mins Media: Large Group Instruction The Army recently announced significant changes to personnel and medical readiness deployability standards with the publication of Army Directive , Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability (1 March 2016). We are going to examine these changes which significantly impact readiness reporting.

General, United States Army
40th CSA’s Priorities People are always my #1 priority: Our Army’s people are our greatest strength and our most important weapon system. Our people are our Soldiers, Family members, Department of the Army Civilians, and Soldiers for Life (retirees, and veterans). We must take care of our people and treat each other with dignity and respect. It is our people who will deliver on our readiness, modernization and reform efforts. Readiness: Army leaders have a sacred obligation to build cohesive teams that are highly trained, disciplined, and fit that can win on any battlefield. Cohesive teams drive tactical to strategic readiness and enable dynamic force employment. We must be ready to defeat any adversary, anywhere, whenever called upon, under any condition. Modernization: The 2018 National Defense Strategy directs the Army to shift focus from irregular warfare to great power competition. We are at a critical inflection point and we must aggressively pursue the Army’s modernization efforts in order to maintain our competitive edge. Modernization must include developing the multi-domain operations concept at echelon, delivering the six modernization priorities, and implementing a 21st Century talent management system. Reform: We cannot be an Industrial Age Army in the Information Age. We must transform all linear industrial age processes to be more effective, protect our resources, and make better decisions. We must be the Army of tomorrow, today. James C. McConville General, United States Army 40th Chief of Staff

Medical Readiness Policy Changes
The SECARMY Directive written by OTSG, HQDA G-1, and HQDA G-3 provides the policy bridge to support implementation of Personnel Readiness transformation to coincide with reductions in Army end strength. Changes to the Medical Readiness Classification (MRC) codes, physical category codes, deployment limiting (DL) codes, and profiling system will be more fully described in the Medical Readiness AR and DA PAM upon publication. The Medical Readiness policy is split into an AR and DA PAM to align with the Army Readiness reporting guidance. The new AR keeps the policy statements simple and clear. SHOW SLIDE: MEDICAL READINESS POLICY CHANGES Due to the scope and pace of Army end-strength downsizing, personnel readiness effects are even more critical to a unit’s worldwide mission accomplishment than in the past. Commanders need the ability to more efficiently manage their force. Personnel and Medical Readiness Transformation: Integrates administrative, medical deployment determinations. Establishes updated personnel readiness reporting. Provides for effective management, communication, and reporting of Soldier readiness to maximize deployability. Administrative publications regarding medical readiness are being revised to capture new medical readiness / deployability standards and procedures. Until these are published, Secretary of the Army (SECARMY) Directive provides the policy bridge to support implementation of personnel readiness transformation. The DA PAM describes how and in some cases why. There will be users and leaders guides to describe the more fluid aspects of the new processes and system. AR will become the medical standards only.

Tactical Points of Influence
(Medical) Readiness is… • Responsibility at the Squad level • Ensured at the Platoon / Company level • Reviewed at the Battalion / Brigade level • Facilitated at the Installation level SHOW SLIDE: TACTICAL POINTS OF INFLUENCE Medical readiness is responsibility of each individual Soldier and echelon of command from Squad-level to Installation. The battalion and brigade S-1 play a key role in monitoring and reporting personnel and medical readiness. As an HR officer, you must clearly understand Personnel and Medical Readiness Transformation and how it impacts both monitoring and reporting. Coordination with Medical Treatment Facilities and installation organizations is critical to facilitate and make ready the operating force (e.g., Soldier Readiness Processing (SRP)).

MEDPROS Commander Portal
(1 of 2) Integrates all essential medical readiness information in one easy-to-use application. Company commander or designee will review the following medical readiness information to determine deployability: Profile Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) status Deployment Health Assessment Program Status Periodic Health Assessment Dental Readiness Medical Readiness Assessment Tool data SHOW SLIDE: MEDPROS COMMANDER PORTAL (1 OF 2) Commander’s Portal for the Medical Protection System. The new Medical Protection System (MEDPROS) Commander’s Portal integrates all essential medical readiness information in one easy-to-use application. The company commander or his/her designee will review the following medical readiness information to determine the deployability status of his/her personnel in the portal: Profile Integrated Disability Evaluation System status Deployment Health Assessment Program status Periodic Health Assessment Dental readiness Medical Readiness Assessment Tool data. A commander’s MEDPROS determination of deployable personnel will automatically feed the commander’s unit status report in the Defense Readiness Reporting System-Army. Link to the demo site:

MEDPROS Commander Portal
(2 of 2) Commanders Portal Home Page provides the following features: Unit Readiness: A consolidated view of unit medical readiness, displays the overall Unit Readiness data and enables commanders to project out to future dates IOT proactively manage Unit Readiness. Manage Deployability: Allows commanders to see the number of Soldiers requiring medical deployability determinations. Manage Profiles: A snapshot of Soldiers on profile and how many profiles still need to be reviewed. Resources: Provides links to unit Medical Readiness Assessment Tool (MRAT) and Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) Dashboard. Action Items: Enables commanders to view all Soldiers with items that need to be actioned in one list regardless of the action needed. (e.g. profile review, deployability determination, overdue IMR items and deployment health assessments needed). Messages: Enables the commander to track and manage communication with Providers regarding Soldiers on profile. SHOW SLIDE: MEDPROS COMMANDER PORTAL (2 OF 2) Commander Portal Home Page provides the following features: UNIT READINESS: A consolidated view of unit medical readiness, displays the overall Unit Readiness data and enables commanders to project out to future dates IOT proactively manage Unit Readiness. MANAGE DEPLOYABILITY: Allows commanders to see the number of Soldiers requiring medical deployability determinations. MANAGE PROFILES: A snapshot of Soldiers on profile and how many profiles still need to be reviewed. RESOURCES: Provides links to unit Medical Readiness Assessment Tool (MRAT) and Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) Dashboard. ACTION ITEMS: Enables commanders to view all Soldiers with items that need to be actioned in one list regardless of the action needed. (e.g. profile review, deployability determination, overdue IMR items and deployment health assessments needed). This was previously in three different applications (eProfile, NetUSR, and MEDPROS Web Reporting). MESSAGES: Enables the commander to track and manage communication with Providers regarding Soldiers on profile.

“Available” to “Deployed”
Deployable Non-Deployable Deployable – A Soldier who is: under the direct operational control of the reporting unit, whether present or can be present within 72 hours is in compliance with all required personnel readiness standards is not restricted from deploying to perform the unit’s core designed and assigned missions Non-Deployable – A Soldier who is restricted from worldwide deployment for a unit’s core designed or assigned mission due to one of the following reasons: does not meet the Army’s baseline individual readiness standards for worldwide deployment as defined by Administrative and Medical policies does not meet the Combatant Commander’s specific individual readiness standards when tailored for accomplishment of an assigned mission cannot be under the direct operational control of the reporting unit (cannot be present within 72 hours) has not graduated from an Area of Concentration (AOC) or Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) awarding course Commander’s Call – any reason not mentioned above SHOW SLIDE: “AVAILABLE” TO “DEPLOYED” SECARMY Directive , Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability (1 March 2016), directed that commander’s will no longer report the “Available” status of personnel in USR. Soldiers are either Deployable or Non-Deployable. The Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA) is leveraging the Medical Readiness (MR) Transformation to change the culture of readiness in the Army. This is a paradigm shift for readiness. Changing the term “availability” to “deployability” highlights the emphasis on Soldiers’ ability to deploy. The change will highlight the population for administrative personnel action focus. Senior leaders recognize there are good reasons that Soldiers might not be able to deploy for long stretches of time, such as pregnancy, tearing an ACL, or getting admitted for pneumonia. NOTE: Review standards for “Deployable” and reasons a Soldier may be considered “Nondeployable.” Applicable to all Operating and Generating Force Soldiers regardless of component

Deployment-Limiting Codes SECARMY Directive 2016-07, Table 1
Description 1 Temp Profile > 30 days 2 Dental Readiness Class 3 3 Pregnancy 4 Permanent profile indicating a MAR2 action needed 5 Permanent profile indicating a MEB action needed 6 Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is needed 7 Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X) SHOW SLIDE: DEPLOYMENT-LIMITING CODES NOTE: Review Deployment-Limiting Codes. Facilitate discussion and answer any questions, as needed. SECARMY Directive , Table 1

Physical Category Codes SECARMY Directive 2016-07, Table 2
Description F No assignment or deployment to OCONUS areas where definitive medical care for the Soldier’s medical condition is not available. S MEB. Soldier has been determined to meet medical retention standards by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). T Waiver granted for a disqualifying medical condition/standard for initial enlistment or appointment. The disqualifying medical condition/standard for which a waiver was granted will be documented in the Soldier’s accession medical examination. V Deployment. This code identifies a Soldier with restrictions on deployment to certain areas. W MAR2. This Soldier has a permanent 3 or 4 profile with a MAR2 (MOS Administrative Retention Review) finding of retain or reclassify and returned to duty. X COAD/COAR. This Soldier is allowed to continue in the military service with a disease, injury, or medical defect that is below medical retention standards, pursuant to a waiver of retention standards, or waiver of unfit finding and continued on active duty or in active Reserve status under AR 635–40. Y Fit for duty. This Soldier has been determined to be fit for duty (not entitled to separation or retirement because of physical disability) after complete processing under AR 635–40. SHOW SLIDE: PHYSICAL CATEGORY CODES NOTE: Review Physical Category Codes. Facilitate discussion and answer any questions, as needed. SECARMY Directive , Table 2

Medical Readiness Categories
MRC Short Definition Medical Definition CDR Deployability Determination MRC 1 Medically Ready / Deployable Meets all Medical Readiness Requirements and Dental Readiness Class 1 or 2 – Temp Profile ≤ 7 days Not required MRC 2 Partially Medically Ready / Deployable Soldier is deficient in one of the following: – Temp Profile between 8 and 14 days inclusive – Hearing Readiness Class 4 (current within 13 months) – Vision Readiness Class 4 (current within 15 months) – DNA (Drawn/ on file with DoD Repository) – HIV (Drawn / validated with DoD Repository) – Immunizations current or valid exception (Routine Adult Immunization Profile) – HepA, HepB, TDA, MMR, Polio, Varicella, (Influenza-seasonal) – Individual Medical Equipment (1MI, 2 pair eye glasses, MCEP-I, MWT, and Hearing Aid w/batteries, if required Not required. MRC 3 Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable Commander determines Deployability for: – Temp Profile >14 Days (DL1) – Dental Readiness Class 3 (DL2) Deployment Limiting Condition (DL). Soldier is deficient in one of the following: DL 1– Temp Profile > 30 days DL 2– Dental Readiness Class 3 DL 3– Pregnancy or post-partum DL 4– Permanent profile indicating an MOS Administrative Retention Review (MAR2) action is needed DL 5– Permanent profile indicating a MEB action is needed DL 6– Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is needed DL 7– Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X) DL 1 / 2: Soldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable; commander determines Deployability. DL 3 / 4 / 5 / 6: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by commander and by policy. DL 7: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by the commander. Upon receipt of an assigned mission, may request COCOM waivers. MRC 4 Non-Deployable and CDR determines Deployability (default Non-Deployable) Status is unknown. – Periodic Health Assessment (current within 15 months) – Dental Readiness Class 4 (current within 15 Months Soldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable Commander determines Deployability. SHOW SLIDE: MEDICAL READINESS CATEGORIES The following are the new Medical Readiness Classes (MRCs) and Deployment-Limiting (DL) codes. The simplified MRCs include only two categories of Soldiers who are not medically ready to deploy: MRC 3 and MRC 4. MRCs 3A and 3B were consolidated into the new MRC 3, which will include seven new DLs to increase transparency and detail. Commanders are required to determine whether Soldiers with MRC 3, DL 1 and 2 and MRC 4 medical conditions are deployable. These determinations will remain in the Commander’s Portal for revalidation every month. MRC 1. This class of Soldiers is fully medically ready and deployable, and includes individuals with temporary profiles up to 7 days in length. This class also includes Soldiers with completed medical or administrative board actions who have no deployment-limiting physical category codes and have: (1) Returned to duty without any board indicated; or (2) Had their area of concentration (AOC)/military occupational specialty (MOS) reclassified; or (3) Received a U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Fit Memorandum, which documents that the Soldier received a “fit” finding from a Physical Evaluation Board. MRC 2. This class of Soldiers is partially medically ready and deployable, and includes Soldiers with profiles from 8 to 14 days in length. MRC 2 Soldiers include those whose vision or hearing is classified as class 4 (MRC 2 are deployable in MODS). MRC 3. This class of Soldiers is not medically ready and will default to nondeployable. (1) Within this class of Soldiers, commanders will determine in the Commander’s Portal whether a Soldier with DL code 1 or 2 is deployable after reviewing the Soldier’s physical profile. Medical conditions that cause Soldiers to be coded as DL 2 must be corrected before the Soldiers can deploy. (2) Additionally, Soldiers with DL 7 codes are not medically ready and cannot deploy without a waiver from the combatant commander. MRC 4. This class of Soldiers is not medically ready and will default to nondeployable unless a commander determines in the Commander’s Portal that a Soldier is deployable. Commanders are required to resolve any medical deficiencies before a Soldier’s deployment. Each month, commanders will evaluate and determine whether Soldiers in this class are deployable and will make every effort to address the underlying causes of a Soldier’s indeterminate MRC 4 status.

Administrative Non-Deployable
Does not meet baseline Individual Readiness Standards • Lautenberg Amendment • Legal Processing • Military, civil, or criminal investigation activity • Pending legal discharge or separation • Sole Survivor / Surviving Family member • Conscientious Objector • Under the age of 18 • Inadequate Family Care Plan • Parenthood or Adoption • Postpartum Operational Deferment Does not meet combatant commander’s (COCOM’s) mission-specific individual readiness standards when tailored for accomplishment of an assigned mission Cannot be under direct operational control of reporting unit (present or able to be present within 72 hours) Transition leave or AWOL No Operational Control (e.g., have deployed separately, rear detachment, TCS, etc.) Soldiers who have not graduated from an AOC / MOS awarding course Commander’s Call SHOW SLIDE: ADMINISTRATIVE NON-DEPLOYABLE Of the total population of Soldiers who are not deployable, 20% are due to administrative reasons, 80% are due to medical reasons. Nondeployable. A Soldier who is restricted from worldwide deployment for a unit’s core designed or assigned mission for one of the following reasons: (1) Does not meet the baseline individual readiness standards for worldwide deployment as follows: (a) Lautenberg Amendment. Soldier is known to have a conviction of a misdemeanor or felony crime of domestic violence. (b) Legal Processing. Soldier is: - Under criminal investigation by civil or military authorities for the commission of a serious offense. A Soldier is under investigation for the commission of a serious offense if a punitive discharge is, or would be, authorized for the same or closely related offense under the Manual for Courts-Martial. - Pending discharge or separation. In cases of administrative separation, a Soldier is pending separation when he has been formally notified of his commander’s intent to initiate separation and is flagged in accordance with AR - Under arrest and/or being held in confinement by military or civilian authorities. - Pending military court-martial or civilian criminal proceedings for the commission of a serious offense. A Soldier is pending court-martial proceedings when the Government has preferred charges against the Soldier under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. A Soldier is pending civilian criminal proceedings when criminal charges have been filed against the Soldier in Federal or State court. In coordination with their servicing Office of the Judge Advocate General, unit commanders may determine that the legal actions do not prevent a Soldier from deploying with his/her unit. (c) Sole Survivor / Surviving Family Member. A Soldier who has sole surviving son and/or daughter status or surviving Family member status. (d) Conscientious Objector. Soldiers with an approved conscientious objector status. (e) Soldiers under the age of 18. (f) Family Care Plan. Soldiers requiring Family care plans who have no evidence of a current or validated plan. (g) Parenthood: - Adoption. A parent adopting a child is nondeployable for 6 months after the child is placed in the home. - Postpartum Operational Deferment. Military mothers of newborns 6 months after childbirth. (2) COCOM Specific Standards. Does not meet the combatant commander’s mission-specific individual readiness standards when tailored for accomplishment of an assigned mission. As determined by the unit commander, the Soldier is unable to comply with theater-specific combatant commander requirements as applicable. (3) Cannot be under the direct operational control of the reporting unit (present or able to be present within 72 hours). (a) Transition Leave. Soldiers who completed final out-processing and are on transition leave. (b) Absent Without Leave. The Soldier is absent without leave. (c) Operational Control. Individual Soldiers who are not under the operational control of the unit for deployment (for example, have deployed separately, rear detachment, Army Medical Department Professional Filler System, temporary change of station, etc.). (4) Soldier Has not graduated from an AOC / MOS awarding course. (5) Commander’s Call. The commander’s determination on deployability, or commander’s call, occurs when a Soldier’s situation does not meet any of these criteria and the commander determines the Soldier is nondeployable. Information technology systems will be developed to enable commanders to show this determination in the respective authoritative data sources (all components) that populate the Defense Readiness Reporting System-Army.

DA Form 3349 Physical Profile Medical Instructions to Unit Commanders
(Page 1) A single living document with temporary and permanent profiles on a single form Incorporates all current functional and assignment limitations Tracks total number of days a Soldier has been on profile and by condition Increases visibility (MEB / IDES) If in MEB / PEB process, only MEB physician can transcribe SHOW SLIDE: DA FORM 3349 – PHYSICAL PROFILE RECORD (PAGE 1) Redesigned Physical Profile (DA Form 3349). Army Directive implements the Army’s new physical profile form—DA Form 3349—which was effective on 1 June DA Form 3349 consolidates all of a Soldier’s physical profiles on one form by describing each of his/her medical conditions (temporary and permanent) and corresponding functional limitations. All legacy profiles remain in effect until they are transferred to DA Form 3349. Commanders will ensure that a Soldier’s legacy profile is transferred to DA Form 3349 before the Soldier completes the next scheduled Periodic Health Assessment. Medical providers will validate all temporary and permanent medical conditions during the transition period. All temporary profiles will expire within 90 days unless Army policy authorizes otherwise. a. Individual Sick Slips (DD Form 689) are valid for only 7 days. b. This directive streamlines physical category codes and rescinds all other physical category codes. Profiling officers will describe the limitations within the context of the profile to communicate with the commander. NOTE: Continued on next slide. Section 5 Medical Instructions to Unit Commanders Details what a Soldier cannot physically do Commanders cannot disregard based on new policy guidance

DA Form 3349 Physical Profile
(Page 2) Section 6 – APFT Details permanent and/or temporary limitations No automatic recovery period – Soldier can take a record APFT when physically able, even with alternate event Section 7 – Physical Readiness Training Capabilities Describes the PRT instructions to optimize Soldier recovery and participation in unit training Providers will be trained to focus on capabilities Section 8 – Unit Commander Unit CDR or his/her designee must review all profiles in the CDR portal, which is recorded here SHOW SLIDE: DA FORM 3349 – PHYSICAL PROFILE RECORD (PAGE 2) c. The profiling officer will generate a profile on the new DA Form 3349 in eProfile and will transcribe all legacy profiles at the next profiling opportunity, but no later than the next Periodic Health Assessment. (1) Profiling officers will provide commanders with a summary of a Soldier’s duty limitations, which will include the functional activities the Soldier can perform under his/her profile. The profiling officer will acknowledge the command teams as partners in medical readiness and personnel deployability through communication and collaboration to ensure maximum mission capability while preserving the health and wellness of the Soldier. (2) Profiling officers will write all temporary profiles for the entire expected duration of the duty limitation up to 90 days. Given that temporary profiles do not prevent Soldiers from taking the Army Physical Fitness Test, profiling officers will designate on DA Form 3349 when the Soldier can take the test. The profiling officer may also designate on the form that the Soldier take an alternate aerobic event. (3) Soldiers will no longer have an automatic recovery period after the termination of their temporary profiles. Additionally, temporary profiles will no longer include the military physical profile serial system (PULHES) characterization. Temporary profiles with MRC and DL characterizations will be for duration only. When renewing a temporary profile, profiling officers will update the functional activities the Soldier can perform. An appropriate physician will review temporary profiles lasting 180 days or longer. d. Commanders will review all pertinent medical information in a Soldier’s profile, including, but not limited to, all active reasons for the profile (sections 2 and 3), any functional limitations (section 4), the medical instructions (section 5), and physical readiness training capabilities (section 7). (1) When determining whether a Soldier can deploy with a physical profile, commanders should discuss their questions and concerns with the profiling officer or request information from the Soldier’s medical provider. Any reservations should be based on the commander’s personal knowledge and firsthand observations of the Soldier’s physical activities. If a profiling officer and commander cannot agree on a Soldier’s duty limitations, the commander should request a “fitness for duty” evaluation. Medical treatment facility commanders, State Surgeons, and the U.S. Army Reserve Command Surgeon will develop processes and procedures to conduct fitness for duty evaluations within their areas of responsibility. However, medical instructions described on a physical profile may not be ignored. This collaboration will ensure high-quality medical care, appropriate duty assignments, and accurate determinations of deployability. (2) Army commanders will review physical profiles within 14 days after a profiling officer issues a profile, while Army National Guard (ARNG)/Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) commanders will review physical profiles within 30 days after a profiling officer issues a profile. The profiling officer will list his/her name and contact information on the same line as the medical condition (reason for profile) so that the Soldier’s commander can correspond with him/her directly within the Commander’s Portal. A copy of any communication between the commander and profiling officer will be sent to the Soldier’s primary care provider, State Surgeon, or the Army Reserve Medical Management Center by component. (3) Commanders will use the Commander’s Portal to make all personnel deployment determinations. The Portal will allow the chain of command above the company level to monitor a subordinate commander’s determinations and review a subordinate unit’s overall medical readiness, including individual physical profiles. (4) Battalion/squadron (O-5 or equivalent) commanders will do a monthly review of temporary profiles lasting 120 days or more. (5) Brigade commanders (O-6 or equivalent) will do a monthly review of temporary profiles lasting 180 days or more. (6) The first general officer in the chain of command will review temporary profiles that are 240 days or older. e. Reserve Command’s Medical Management Center must validate all DA Form 3349s generated for USAR Soldiers drilling in a Troop Program Unit status before the Soldier can be referred to the MAR2 process or Disability Evaluation System (DES). This will include all temporary profiles greater than 30 days in length and all permanent 2, 3, or 4 profiles.

Check on Learning Q. When is a Soldier considered to be “deployable”?
A. A Soldier is considered deployable when: The Soldier is under the direct operational control of the reporting unit, whether present or can be present within 72 hours; The Soldier is in compliance with all required personnel readiness standards; and The Soldier is not restricted from deploying to perform the unit’s core designed and assigned missions. Q. Under which Deployment Limiting Conditions must the commander make a decision on whether the Soldier is deployable? A. DL 1 - Temporary Profile > 30 days DL 2 - Dental Readiness Class 3 Q. What are the four Medical Readiness Categories? A. MRC 1 - Medically Ready / Deployable MRC 2 - Partially Medically Ready / Deployable MRC 3 - Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable; commander determines deployability for: DL1 – Temp Profile > days; DL2 – Dental Readiness Class MRC 4 - Not Medically Ready / Nondeployable and Commander determines deployability (default is nondeployable) SHOW SLIDE: CHECK ON LEARNING Q. When is a Soldier considered to be “deployable”? A. A Soldier is considered deployable when: The Soldier is under the direct operational control of the reporting unit, whether present or can be present within 72 hours; The Soldier is in compliance with all required personnel readiness standards; and The Soldier is not restricted from deploying to perform the unit’s core designed and assigned missions. Q. Under which Deployment14-Limiting Conditions must the commander make a decision on whether the Soldier is deployable? A. DL 1 - Temporary Profile > 30 days DL 2 - Dental Readiness Class 3 Q. What are the four Medical Readiness Categories? A. MRC 1 - Medically Ready / Deployable MRC 2 - Partially Medically Ready / Deployable MRC 3 - Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable; commander determines deployability for: DL1 – Temp Profile > days; DL2 – Dental Readiness Class MRC 4 - Not Medically Ready / Nondeployable and Commander determines deployability (default is nondeployable)

USR Personnel Reporting Data and HQDA Reporting Policies
SHOW SLIDE: USR PERSONNEL REPORTING DATA AND HQDA REPORTING POLICIES Learning Step / Activity 2. Review USR Personnel Readiness Data and HQDA USR Reporting Policies Method of Instruction: DSL - Discussion Instructor to Student Ratio: 1:36 Time of Instruction: 1 hr: 30 mins Media: Large Group Instruction Based on the Personnel and Medical Readiness Transformation initiative, AR and DA PAM require revision. HQDA indicates they should be updated and published by January Until then, SECARMY DIRECTIVE , provides revised policies. In addition to AR and DA PAM 220-1, AR (Personnel Processing (In-, Out-, Soldier Readiness and Deployment Cycle) is being revised / updated to reflect current policies for publication by January 2017. During this learning activity, we are going to see how these policy changes impact the USR. AR 220-1 DA PAM 220-1 Army Directive

Readiness Reporting Policy
Commanders will report the “deployable” status of all personnel in USR as it relates to unit personnel readiness status (P-Level). Commander’s Override to a Soldier’s administrative and medical deployability will be performed in the authoritative data sources that provide medical and administrative readiness status (e.g., MEDPROS, eMILPO, RLAS, SIDPERS). Overall Unit Readiness A unit’s C-Level assessment will be derived from the four measured areas of Personnel (P), Equipment and Supplies On Hand (S), Equipment Readiness (R), and Training level (T). Personnel Measured Areas (P-Level) Unit will measure personnel readiness using three metrics: Total Deployable Strength Assigned Military Occupational Specialty Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level The terms “available / non-available” replaced by “deployable / non-deployable.” SHOW SLIDE: ADJUSTMENTS TO READINESS REPORTING POLICY OF AR 220-1 NOTE: Reference Army Directive (page 18). 1. Readiness Reporting a. Again, as previously discussed, commanders will no longer report the “available” status of personnel as it relates to unit readiness reporting, but will instead report the “deployable” status of all personnel through the Army’s readiness reporting system as it relates to unit personnel readiness status (P level). b. The commander’s override to a Soldier’s administrative and medical deployability status will be performed in the authoritative data sources that provide the medical and administrative readiness status (e.g., MEDPROS, Regional Level Application Software, the Electronic Military Personnel Office, and/or the Standard Installation/Division Personnel System). This capability will no longer reside in NetUSR. 2. Overall Unit Readiness. This directive does not change the assessment of the unit overall readiness to perform its core mission in accordance with its designed capabilities or assigned mission. A unit’s C-Level and A-Level assessments will continue to be derived from the four measured areas of P, S, R, T levels, or the two measured areas of assigned mission manning and assigned mission equipment, respectively. 3. Personnel Measured Areas (P-Level). Units will measure personnel readiness using three metrics: Total Deployable Strength, Assigned Military Occupational Specialty skills match, and the Deployable Senior Grade Composite level. Additionally, the terms available / nonavailable will be replaced by deployable/nondeployable with updates to administrative and medical criteria to determine Soldier deployability. SECARMY Directive

Commander’s Unit Status Report
OVERVIEW: The USR is intended to be a “commander’s report,” reflecting the commander’s personal judgments and assessments regarding the mission readiness of the unit. Reports are prepared by commanders or their designated representatives and routinely submitted through assigned channels to HQDA. The USR is not a performance report card and should not be used as a tool to evaluate or compare the accomplishments of organizations or those of their commanders. All commanders at all times will submit timely, accurate and complete reports that neither exaggerate nor mask their units’ readiness deficiencies. No commander is expected to report readiness levels that are inconsistent with resources made available to the unit. SHOW SLIDE: CDR’S UNIT STATUS REPORT (USR) The CUSR is intended to be a “commander’s report,” reflecting the commander’s personal judgments and assessments regarding the mission readiness of the unit. (1) Reports are prepared by commanders or their designated representatives and routinely submitted through administrative control (ADCON) channels to HQDA. (2) The CUSR is not a performance report card and should not be used as a tool to evaluate or compare the accomplishments of organizations or those of their commanders. (3) All commanders at all times will submit timely, accurate and complete reports that neither exaggerate nor mask their units’ readiness deficiencies. (4) No commander is expected to report readiness levels that are inconsistent with resources made available to the unit (5) ADCON authorities at higher levels will review reports to ensure that they comply with regulatory requirements.

Reporting Units MTOE Units TDA Units Special USR Provisions
Units with Unit Identification Code (UIC) ending in AA TDA Units Units with UIC-AA Units that are deployable or apportioned to Joint operations/ contingency plans Special USR Provisions Units with UIC ending in FF Separate Brigades Multi-component units (COMPO) No unit automatically exempt from USR requirements SHOW SLIDE 6: REPORTING UNITS Reporting Units. Designated MTOE and TDA units will submit periodic reports in accordance with the policy guidance contained in the AR These reports reflect the measured unit commander’s assessment of his or her unit’s overall status determined by using established procedures to compare selected personnel, equipment, equipment readiness, and training factors to wartime or primary mission requirements for which the unit is organized or designed. These reports are reviewed by commanders at higher levels and are placed into the Army’s readiness reporting system using NetUSR which updates the DRRS-A database. (1) MTOE Units: All MTOE units with UICs ending in AA, to include: (a) MTOE battalions, separate companies, separate detachments, or equivalent size units (parent units), that are organic to or included in the designed/established structure of a corps headquarters, division, regiment, separate brigade or Army special operations forces (ARSOF) groups, regiments and commands and modular designed combat brigades, support brigade, and division headquarters. (b) MTOE units not organic to or part of the designed/established structure of one of the major units / headquarters described above. (2) TDA Units: All TDA units with UICs ending in AA (except bands and other TDA units for which special provisions apply), that are deployable or apportioned in a Joint operations plan or contingency plan, and USAR medical (including augmentation) units will report against the unit’s current TDA requirements authorizations, unless they have been specifically exempted from reporting by the parent responsible ACOM/ASCC/DRU and/or DARNG/NGB, when applicable ACOM. SHOW SLIDE: REPORTING UNITS Reference: AR 220-1, Chapter 8 “Reporting units” is generic Army unique terminology that encompasses all active duty Army units and RC Army units not on active duty that are required by this regulation to report resource measurements, capabilities assessments, or designated Army unique requirements into the DRRS–Army database. Reporting units include, but are not limited to, all measured units and all assessed units. All MTOE units with UICs ending in AA (parent units) that are registered in the DRRS–Army database (except the MTOE units for which special provisions apply; see para 8–4, AR 220-1) are reporting units that are required to submit CUSRs. These assessed units include, but are not limited to— (1) The MTOE battalions, separate companies, separate detachments, or equivalent size units, that are organic to or included in the designed structure of a major unit or major headquarters (that is, corps headquarters, division, regiment, separate brigade, or Army Special Operations Forces groups, regiments, commands, modular designed combat brigades, support brigade, and division headquarters, and so forth). (2) The MTOE units not organic to or part of the designed structure of one of the major units/headquarters described above that are company-size units or larger and are parent units (AA-level UIC), parent-level detachments, and parent level units that are deployable under any Joint operations plan. TDA units that are required to report into the DRRS–Army database are those with AA-level UICs (parent units) that have not been officially exempted from reporting in accordance with the procedures in paragraph 8–5, AR These TDA units will submit reports in accordance with the reporting frequency requirements and the minimum data entry requirements established in chapter 4 for TDA units submitting CUSRs (also see table 4–1). NOTE: See paragraph 8-4, AR for detailed information on Special USR Provisions. There are numerous exceptions and special reporting rules.

Report Formats and Categories
CUSRs are comprised of: Basic Unit Information (BUI) Readiness and capability measurements Assessments and data points Commander’s comments Two formats: Full Abbreviated Four categories Regular Validation Deployed Change SHOW SLIDE: REPORT FORMATS AND CATEGORIES 4–11. Commander’s Unit Status Reports a. General. The USRs are comprised of basic unit information (BUI), readiness and capability measurements, assessments and data points, and the commanders’ comments. There are two formats for USRs-“full” and “abbreviated”-- and four categories of reports that the commanders of units, organizations and installations use to report the required information into the DRRS-Army database via NetUSR-“regular” reports, “validation” reports, “deployed” reports, and “change” reports. b. Basic unit information. The BUI is the information reported by reporting unit commander that is used to identify his specific unit, to establish its resource and training requirements and to indicate the current command chains (operational and administrative) and CUSR oversight responsibilities. The BUI must be reviewed and updated by the commander of a reporting unit in conjunction with each CUSR that he prepares and submits into the DRRS–Army database. The BUI also aids in auto-calculations throughout the report preparation process. BUI data entry requirements are applicable to all reporting units. Mandatory data fields depend on the type of unit and/or type of report. As units are alerted and deployed for missions, their command relationships with employing headquarters will vary according to strategic, operational, and tactical circumstances. Commanders of reporting units update their BUI to indicate their current command relationships and authorities, to include identifying their organic elements and current augmentations by UIC and DUIC. The NetUSR User’s Guide and user help screens explain the BUI data entry requirements in detail. c. CUSR Formats. The readiness status reporting requirements established by this regulation are accomplished by reporting units using the following two USR formats. (1) Full report format. This report format entails extensive and detailed readiness status data and information on the reporting unit and provides a comprehensive readiness status report. The full report format produces the most objective report, and the preponderance of the available data fields in the full report format are established as mandatory requirements. The NetUSR application imports status data and information from official Army sources and also from the reports submitted by subordinate elements to facilitate readiness status determinations in accordance with established criteria. The measured area levels are calculated based on the current status of individual Soldiers and specific equipment items or they are a composite calculation reflecting the aggregation of levels reported by subordinate measured units. In general, reporting units that are located at their home stations or at training sites are required to submit full reports. (2) Abbreviated report format. This report format, previously called the “deployed report” and also known as the “short report” format, entails the minimum data necessary to portray the general readiness status of the reporting unit and to satisfy HQDA, Joint Staff and OSD requirements. The abbreviated report format produces a more subjective report than a full report, and a significant number of the data fields in the full report format are either unavailable or are optional for data entry in an abbreviated report. The abbreviated report format does not require that a NetUSR user import status data and information from official Army sources. When required, the measured area levels normally are determined based on the commander’s subjective assessments. In general, units and organizations that have structures and/or resource requirements that are not established by a formal requirements and authorization document (MTOE or TDA) will submit an abbreviated report. Additionally, measured units that currently are deployed away from their home stations to meet operational requirements normally are authorized to submit abbreviated reports in lieu of the full reports. Also, for exceptional situations, abbreviated reports can be authorized ILO approvals for reporting exemptions. d. CUSR Categories. (1) Regular reports. The USRs in this category include those reports from Operating Force units that are routinely submitted into the DRRS-Army database pursuant to the Army’s normal mid-month readiness reporting cycle. Regular reports have an “as of date” or “RICDA” of the 15th of the month. The RICDA is a GSORTS data field label (not an acronym) for the effective date or “as of” date of the status data and information contained in the report. The regular reports category includes the composite reports required for submission by major units and major headquarters and also the reports from those subordinate elements (DUICs) and Generating Force units (installations, training base units, and so forth,) required to submit reports. Regular reports formats can vary from month to month but usually do not. (2) Validation reports. The RC units (ARNG/ARNGUS and USAR) and APS submit a validation report when there is no change in readiness status from the last report submitted. Validation reports enable RC units and APS to meet the Joint Staff’s requirement for a monthly report (without the need to prepare a completely new report) when there are no significant changes in the readiness status of the unit. A validation report cannot be used if there is any change to an overall level, the status level of any measured area, the location, mission, or the command relationship with the next higher headquarters. Since Validation reports merely update the RICDA of the readiness status information and data contained in the previous report, they assume the format of the previously submitted report. Validation reports must have a RICDA indicating the 15th of the month. (a) Change reports. These reports have a RICDA other than the 15th of the month and are submitted to report a change or update to the readiness status data or information of a reporting unit. Significant changes requiring the submission of a change report include any change to an overall readiness status level or overall capability assessment, any change to a measured area level, even if the overall level does not change, and any change to location, mission, or the command relationship with the next higher headquarters. Change reports are required to be submitted within 24 hours of the event requiring the change report. When applicable, change reports can differ in format from the previous report or the change report can replicate most of the data contained in a previous report, except for the changed status data. (b) Deployed reports. These reports are submitted while a unit or organization is deployed away from its home station to execute an operational requirement. The first deployed report is required within 24 hours after the main body closes in theater (during RSOI) or at the deployed location and subsequently, deployed reports are required as of the 15th of each month while the unit or organization is deployed. Deployed reports are due to HQDA NLT 96 hours after the “as of date” or RICDA. Deployed units may use either the full or abbreviated format. Deployed reports allow the commander to continue to determine and report the status of resources and training for his unit’s core functions and designed capabilities while, concurrently, determining and reporting the ability of the unit or organization to undertake the current operational requirement. Detailed guidelines for deployed reporting are provided at paragraph 10–5.

DRRS-A Overview User interface for DRRS-A is NetUSR.
Secure, web-based information system. Resource information provided via authoritative databases and not via input from individual units. Units use the NetUSR tool to determine and communicate their status and mission capabilities. Transforms the Army’s business processes and mindset for reporting readiness. SHOW SLIDE: DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM-ARMY (DRRS-A) DRRS is a mission-focused, capabilities-based, common framework that provides the combatant commanders, military services, Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), and other key DoD users a data-driven environment and tools in which to evaluate, in near real-time, the readiness and capability of U.S. Armed Forces to carry out assigned and potential tasks. DRRS-A is a network of interdependent programs, processes, applications, and systems that enable and support readiness-related decision making. DRRS-A establishes the “framework” of architectures, databases, tools, networks, and information technologies that provide the backbone for the DoD’s readiness measurement, assessment, and reporting and readiness-related decision support. Overall, DRRS-A provides the advanced technical and information framework for operators, planners, supporters, and policymakers alike. The real key to success is the Department-wide collaboration and cooperation by all stakeholders, who must be aware of the capabilities, interdependencies, and possibilities made available by the enhanced DRRS environment. DRRS is intended to change how we look at readiness, how we measure readiness, and how we use readiness information. NOTE: CLICK MOUSE TO ADVANCE GRAPHIC TO NETUSR Net USR is a net-centric, streamlined system which supports the enhanced reporting requirements of current regulations and interfaces with DRRS-A. The Army Readiness Management System (ARMS) Application--the official DRRS-Army business intelligence and output tool that provides visibility to selected Army readiness status and force registration data and information contained in the DRRS-Army database.

NetUSR Overview Web-based Army readiness input tool
NetUSR Personnel Menu Web-based Army readiness input tool Net-centric component of DRRS-A Facilitates entering / reviewing readiness status information Data entry for: Basic unit information Equipment on-hand status / equipment readiness status Personnel status Training status Automated selection/retrieval of MTOE information Services retrieve data from automated systems for readiness status reports Readiness information processed using NetUSR SHOW SLIDE: NETUSR TOOL NetUSR makes the process of entering and reviewing readiness status information easier. NetUSR reduces the time necessary to create an initial or regular USR at the unit level. It further provides the senior commander with mission essential task information on units, thereby providing enhanced planning capabilities. NetUSR works in both a networked and stand-alone environment. Army organizations use NetUSR to determine and communicate their organization’s status and mission capabilities. NetUSR contains all the basic resource information contained in previous automated readiness systems with the major difference being that resource information is automatically provided via authoritative databases and not via input from individual units. Even more importantly, NetUSR explicitly uses and disseminates detailed measures of the quality and quantity of resources such as personnel, training, and key equipment. For example, it lists the rank, skills, and certifications for all individuals assigned to each reporting organization. Users can view this information in aggregate or drill down to the individual level. Similar data are provided for other resource categories. NetUSR allows user data entry of the following: basic unit information; equipment on-hand status; personnel status; and training status. It also allows automated selection and retrieval of MTOE information to facilitate report creation. More than just for data entry, NetUSR contains services to retrieve data from automated systems that facilitate unit status report creation. This information can then be exported to a local computer, where the information can be processed using NetUSR.

Report Submission AR 220-1, Table 4-1 SHOW SLIDE: REPORT SUBMISSION
Notes from Table 4-1, AR 220-1 1 The NetUSR User’s Guide and user help screens describe each report type in detail, to include the reporting units to which each report type is applicable and the circumstances for which the use of each report type is authorized. 2 “Active Army” units include COMPO 1 units and RC units (ARNG and USAR) that currently are on active duty status. “Designated” TDA units are those TDA units for which special reporting provisions apply (see para 8-4). 3 Other” TDA units are TDA units that are not Army garrisons, installations or those TDA units for which special provisions apply in accordance with paragraph 8–4. 4 The readiness status data in regular reports is as of the 15th of the month that reports are required (monthly or quarterly), and the reports are due to HQDA not later than (NLT) 96 hours after this “as of date.” 5 Validation reports are applicable to APS (COMPO 6) and RC (COMPO 2 and COMPO 3) MTOE units and organizations that are not on active duty status. RC units identified and scheduled (alerted) for operational deployment are required to submit monthly regular reports in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 8–4. 6 Change Reports are required to be submitted within 24 hours of the event requiring the change report. HQDA requires that “other” TDA units report any changes to readiness status levels or assessments in their next report when due. However, the ACOM, ASCC, DRU, or DARNG for non mobilized ARNG TDA units, may require change reports via their supplementary instructions. 7 The first deployed reports is required within 24 hours after the main body closes in theater (during RSOI) or at the deployed location, and subsequent reports are due as of the 15th of each month while the unit is deployed. TDA units and organizations that are deployed must comply with the same monthly reporting requirements as deployed MTOE units. While APS is issued, custodians may report level 6 and/or C–5 in accordance with paragraphs 4–6 and 4–8, respectively. The APS custodians also will report deployment indicator code “E” when equipment is issued. 4–14. Timeliness of data a. “Real time” is considered to be valid information received at HQDA within 24 hours of actual status change. That status may be forecast up to 72 hours from the time of the assessment if the unit expects to receive additional resources if called upon to execute a particular mission. Expectations that are not based on a formal plan must be confirmed via command channels. b. All Army reporting units must maintain the currency of their registration information and submit an update within 24 hours of a change. c. The following timelines apply to all units, except installations, required to assess, and report readiness status (that is, assessed units): (1) Per 10 USC 117, units required to assess readiness must submit an assessment on a monthly basis or within 24 hours of a change as outlined below. (2) The following events will necessitate a change report due within 24 hours of the event necessitating the change: (a) As applicable, a change to the C-level or the A-level overall assessments. (b) As applicable, a change in any of the individual measured resource area levels that support the C-level and A-level overall assessments. (c) As applicable, the receipt by a unit of an execute order or prepare to deploy order. (d) As applicable, the receipt of a mobilization order by a RC unit and the unit’s arrival at the mobilization station or demobilization station. (e) A change in status resulting in a “No” assessment for any of the METs associated with the unit’s core functions/designed capabilities or assigned mission or a change in the unit’s location, mission or command relationship with the next higher unit. d. In any event, Army assessed units will perform measurements and assessments on a monthly basis. AR 220-1, Table 4-1

USR Security Classification
Classification is based on number / type of reporting units and the amount / type of sensitive information. Minimum classification for MTOE units: SECRET: Major Combat Units (FF-level UIC) at the brigade-level and above SECRET: More than one battalion or five or more separate MTOE company / detachment sized units (AA-level UIC) CONFIDENTIAL: All reports not classified SECRET IAW established guidelines Retain for minimum of 2 years at the major unit/headquarters level; not less than 6 months by other reporting units (AA-level UIC) All USRs and associated data will be marked with a specific declassification date SHOW SLIDE: USR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION (AR 220-1, Chapter 11d (1): The classification requirements for USRs and the USR data in the DRRS-Army database are based on the number and type of reporting units and the amount and type of sensitive information or data in the USR that require protection from unauthorized disclosure. Minimum Classification of the USRs of MTOE units and organizations. SECRET when the USR is a report submitted by a MTOE organization at the brigade level and above, to include the major units and major headquarters. SECRET when more than one battalion or five or more separate MTOE company/detachment-size units (AA-level UIC) are represented or reflected in the report. CONFIDENTIAL for all reports not classified SECRET in accordance with the guidelines above. The security classification of USRs submitted by TDA units, organizations and installations is CONFIDENTIAL, unless a higher level of security classification has been specifically prescribed. AR 220-1, Chapter 11

Overall Unit Readiness and Mission Capability Assessments
Commanders Unit Status Report (CUSR) One report contains both the “as designed“ and “assigned mission” assessments. Commanders always report this assessment monthly. Fulfills Existing Joint Staff Requirements (supports Congressional Oversight, Chairman’s Risk Assessment, and other COCOM oriented assessments) Core Functions/Designed Capabilities = MTOE/TDA Personnel Equipment on Hand Equipment Serviceability Training (METL) C-Level How well a unit is resourced and trained, measured against the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was “as designed”. A-Level How well a unit is resourced and trained measured against the “assigned mission” requirements of the unit. SHOW SLIDE: OVERALL UNIT READINESS AND MISSION CAPABILITY ASSESSMENTS C-Level. The C-Level is an overall readiness assessment that reflects the unit‘s ability to accomplish core functions, provide designed capabilities, and execute the standardized FSO METL. The assessment is derived from four measured areas (PSRT) that indicate the availability status of resources (personnel and equipment) and unit training proficiency measured against the designed capabilities derived from the unit‘s MTOE or TDA. The C-Level assessment is the worst case of the four measured resource areas (PSRT) and can be subjectively upgraded or downgraded by the commander to reflect the commander‘s professional experience and judgment (paragraph 4-5, AR 220-1, explains the restrictions on subjective changes). To meet Joint Staff and DOD reporting requirements, all Army units are required to assess and report their C-levels on a monthly basis. A-Level. The A-Level is an overall readiness assessment that reflects the unit‘s ability to accomplish its assigned mission. The A-Level contains measured resource areas that indicate the availability status of resources (personnel and equipment) measured against the assigned mission requirements that have been established or conveyed by the Army Tasking Authority. If the unit is preparing for or executing an assigned mission encompassing all of its core functions and designed capabilities, then the A-level and C-level will coincide. Note that an A-level is determined and reported only for one assigned mission. Units with more than one assigned mission will establish the primary assigned mission, determine, and report the A-Level for the primary assigned mission only. See appendix C, AR 220-1, for detailed provisions for determining and reporting the A-Level. Commander’s Subjective Upgrades and Downgrades. Modifications to the levels determined for the individually measured resource areas (i.e., P, S, R and T) are not allowed. However, the commander can subjectively adjust the C-level or the A-level initially established for the unit that is based the lowest (worst case) level computed for the associated measured resource areas. The commander will compare the initial C-level or A-level determination to the C-level and A-level definitions in para 4-6, respectively, and then, if necessary, subjectively upgrade or downgrade this initial C-level or A-level to align the C-level or A-level reported with the definition that most closely matches his overall readiness assessments (See para 4-5, AR 220-1, for specific policy guidance). Feeds Joint Staff Percentage Effective (PCTEF) data requirement) Assigned Mission Manning Assigned Mission Equipping Commanders report A-Level when one condition is met: Directed by chain of command. When the focus of training is the deployed mission environment (i.e., NLT LAD minus 270 days) Commanders report this assessment when a mission is assigned. AR 220-1, Chapter 9

The Four Tier Rating Scale AR 220-1, Para 4-6 & DA PAM 220-1, Para 3-5
The following metrics comprise the “four tier” rating scale for unit readiness status measurements and assessments. Note that level 5 and level 6 are exceptional values reported in place of level 4 only when special circumstances apply. 1 Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission it is currently assigned. SHOW SLIDE: THE FOUR TIER RATING SCALE (AR 220-1, 4-6) The following metrics comprise the “four tier” rating scale for unit readiness status measurements and assessments. Note that level 5 and level 6 are exceptional values reported in place of level 4 or only when special circumstances apply, respectively. “1” The unit possesses the required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission it is currently assigned. The status of resources and training in the unit does not limit flexibility in methods to accomplish core functions or assigned missions nor increase vulnerability of unit personnel and equipment. The unit does not require any compensation for deficiencies. “2” The unit possesses the required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide most of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake most of the mission it is currently assigned. The status of resources and training in the unit may cause isolated decreases in the flexibility of choices to accomplish core functions or currently assigned missions. However, this status will not increase the vulnerability of the unit under most envisioned operational scenarios. The unit will require little, if any, compensation for deficiencies. “3” The unit possesses the required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide many, but not all, of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission it is currently assigned. The status of resource and training in the unit will result in significant decreases in flexibility to accomplish the core functions or the assigned missions and will increase vulnerability of the unit under many, but not all, envisioned operational scenarios. The unit will require significant compensation for deficiencies. “4” The unit requires additional resources or training to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission currently assigned; however, the unit may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand (available). “5” The unit is undergoing a HQDA-directed resource action and/or is part of a HQDA directed program and is not prepared to accomplish or provide the core functions or fundamental capabilities for which it was designed. Units report C-5 IAW the policy and procedures established in para 4-8. Level 5 is not applicable to A-level reporting. “6” Level 6 is applicable to the measured areas only (see para 4-3). It indicates that a measured area is not measurable, or by HQDA direction, is not measured. 2 Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide most of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake most of the mission it is currently assigned. 3 Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide many, but not all, of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission it is currently assigned. 4 Unit requires additional resources or training to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission currently assigned; however, the unit may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand (available). 5 Unit is undergoing a HQDA-directed resource action and/or is part of a HQDA directed program and is not prepared to accomplish or provide the core functions or fundamental capabilities for which it was designed. Units report C-5 IAW the policy and procedures established in AR 220-1, para 4-8. Level 5 is not applicable to A-level reporting. 6 Level 6 is applicable to the measured areas only. It indicates that a measured area is not measurable, or by HQDA direction, is not measured. AR 220-1, Para 4-6 & DA PAM 220-1, Para 3-5

Category Levels (C-Level) AR 220-1, para 4-4a & DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5
An overall unit readiness metric established by the Joint Staff. C-levels reflect the unit‘s ability to accomplish core functions, provide designed capabilities, and execute the standardized Mission Essential Tasks (METs). Derived from four measured areas (PSRT) that indicate the availability status of resources and unit training proficiency measured against the designed capabilities from the unit’s MTOE or TDA. SHOW SLIDE: CATEGORY LEVELS (C-LEVEL) Category Levels. The C-level assessment for the reporting unit is determined and reported by the unit commander to indicate the ability of the unit and its overall readiness to accomplish its core functions and to provide its designed capabilities. Valid entries for the C-level are numeric values: "1," "2," "3," "4" or “5”. The following definitions apply. (1) C-1 level indicates the unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake the mission for which it is designed. The status of resources and training will neither limit flexibility in methods for mission accomplishment nor increase vulnerability of unit personnel and equipment. The unit does not require any compensation for deficiencies. (2) C-2 level indicates the unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of its mission for which it is designed. The status of resources and training may cause isolated decreases in flexibility in methods for mission accomplishment but will not increase the vulnerability of the unit under most envisioned operational scenarios. The unit would require little, if any, compensation for deficiencies. (3) C-3 level indicates the unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission for which it is designed. The status of resources or training will result in a significant decrease in flexibility for mission accomplishment and will increase the vulnerability of the unit under many, but not all, envisioned operational scenarios. The unit would require significant compensation for deficiencies. (4) C-4 level indicates the unit requires additional resources or training to undertake its designed mission, but it may be directed to undertake portions of its mission with resources on hand. (5) C-5 level indicates the unit is undergoing a service-directed resource action and is not prepared, at this time, to undertake the full spectrum mission for which it is designed. HQDA employs the force development process with the goal of "standing-up" units at the overall level of C-3 or better. In many cases, actions impacting on unit status can be synchronized so that transitioning units can shorten the time period in C-5 status or avoid C-5 status entirely. (6) Level 6 indicates that one or more of the measured areas are not measurable, or by Service direction is not measured. (For example, the equipment readiness of a unit cannot be measured because a civilian contractor performs maintenance for the unit or the unit is an Opposing Force (OPFOR) unit at a training center that has no organic reportable equipment). Level 6 is not used as an overall category level. Although unmeasured areas are not reportable for USR purposes, commanders remain responsible for accountability and management of any Army personnel and equipment. C-1: Unit can undertake the missions it was designed for C-2: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of the its missions for which it is designed C-3: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission for which it is designed C-4: Unit requires additional resources or training to undertake its designed mission, but may be directed to undertake some portions of its mission with resources on hand C-5: Unit is undergoing a service directed resource action and is not prepared, at this time, to undertake the full spectrum mission for which designed AR 220-1, para 4-4a & DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5

Army Methodology for Overall Readiness Assessments
Category Level (C-Level) SHOW SLIDE: ARMY METHODOLOGY FOR OVERALL READINESS ASSESSMENTS – CATEGORY LEVEL (C-LEVEL) NOTE: Use this slide to walk students through the overall C-Level assessment process. Facilitate discussion on how PSRT can impact the commander’s judgment and overall assessment. AR 220-1, Figure 4-2

Assigned Mission Levels (A-Level)
Overall assessment that reflects the unit’s ability to accomplish the assigned mission and those tasks on its METL. Contains measured resource areas that indicate the availability status of resources (personnel and equipment) measured against resource requirements for the assigned mission. SHOW SLIDE: ASSIGNED MISSION LEVELS (A-LEVEL) The A-level is an overall readiness assessment that reflects the unit‘s ability to accomplish the assigned mission and those tasks on its METL that are specifically associated with the assigned mission. The A-level contains measured resource areas that indicate the availability status of resources (personnel and equipment) measured against the resource requirements for the assigned mission that have been established or conveyed by the Army Tasking Authority. If the unit is preparing for or executing an assigned mission encompassing all of its core functions and designed capabilities, then the A-level and C-level will coincide. A-1: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake the full assigned mission. A-2: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of the assigned mission. A-3: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all, portions of the assigned mission. A-4: Unit requires additional resources or training to undertake the assigned mission, but may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand. AR 220-1, Para 4-4(b) & DA PAM 220-1, Para 3-5(b)

Army Methodology for Overall Readiness Assessments
Assigned Mission-Level (A-Level) SHOW SLIDE: ARMY METHODOLOGY FOR OVERALL UNIT READINESS ASSESSMENTS NOTE: Use this slide to walk students through the overall A-Level assessment process. Facilitate discussion on how PSRT can impact the commander’s judgment and overall assessment. AR 220-1, Figure 4-2

Measured Areas of the USR (P, S, R, T)
Personnel Level (P-level) Lowest level determined for: Total Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level Equipment Readiness / Serviceability (R-level) Indicates how well unit is maintaining its on-hand equipment. Considered operational if “Fully Mission Capable” IAW applicable technical manual (TM) standards. Determined by calculating an aggregate R-level that considers all maintenance reportable equipment in the unit’s possession and then determining a separate R-level for each maintenance reportable pacing item. SHOW SLIDE: MEASURED AREAS OF THE USR (AR 220-1, 4-3b 1-4) *ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON EACH MEASURED AREA IS LOCATED IN AR 220-1, CHAPTER 9. The primary objective of the USR is to enable commanders of reporting organizations to uniformly determine and accurately report an overall level or category level (C-level) that indicates the degree at which the unit has achieved prescribed levels of fills in the following categories. The C-level is based on the objective and subjective assessments of these categories: USR MEASURED AREAS General. Four measured areas support the overall assessment of the unit’s core functions and designed capabilities (C-level); two measured areas support the overall assigned mission (A-level) assessment; and two measured areas support the overall Chemical Biological Defense Resources and Training (CBDRT) level assessment. Paragraph 4–4 explains the overall readiness assessments. This paragraph explains the various measured areas. The NetUSR User’s Guide and help screens explain in detail the procedures to determine and report the various measured area levels. Modification of the computed status of each individually measured area is not permitted. An overview of USR metrics is provided at paragraph 4–15. Measured areas supporting the overall C-level assessment. Commanders determine and report four measured area levels indicating the current status of resources and training in the unit to support their overall C-level assessments: personnel (P), equipment and supplies (S) on–hand/available, equipment readiness/serviceability (R), and unit training proficiency (T). These measured areas are referred to as “PSRT” and are further explained in Chapter 9. Personnel (P-level). Army measured units will measure personnel readiness using three metrics for personnel fill percentages that are based on the unit’s strength requirements for its core functions/designed capabilities: - Total deployable personnel strength - Assigned MOS Skills Match - Deployable Senior Grade Level Composite The applicable MTOE or TDA that reflects the unit’s core functions/designed capabilities is the authoritative source for the unit’s required strength. While Army measured units also are required to determine and report additional personnel data (for example, the assigned strength percentage, turnover percentage, and so on), the personnel level is determined solely based on the results of these three P-level metrics. See paragraph 9–2. We will learn how to calculate P-Level metrics later on in the lesson. (2) Equipment and supplies on–hand/available (S-level). Army measured units determine and report an S-level by determining by line item number (LIN) the on hand/availability status of designated critical equipment items (pacing items) and the on–hand/availability status of the other mission essential equipment items (ERC A) that are listed on the unit’s MTOE or TDA. Substitute items prescribed by HQDA via SB 700–20 and in lieu of (ILO) substitutions directed by HQDA or determined by the commander are applied in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 9–3. Note that for this S-level measurement, the on hand/availability status of equipment items is based solely on those equipment items currently in the unit’s possession, under its control or, when applicable, available to it within 72 hours for mission execution. The S-level measurement is not based solely on property accountability records, and it does not consider the operational readiness/serviceability of the equipment items. A discrete measurement is accomplished at the LIN level of detail by comparing the equipment items currently in the unit’s possession, under its control or available to it within 72 hours, to the equipment items required to accomplish its core functions/designed capabilities, and an S level rating is determined for each measurement. The applicable MTOE or TDA that reflects the unit’s core functions/designed capabilities is the authoritative source for the unit’s equipment requirements. The unit’s S-level rating is determined in accordance with a methodology that considers each of these by LIN S-level measurements. See paragraph 9–3. (3) Equipment readiness/serviceability (R-level). Army measured units will measure the operational readiness or serviceability of the critical equipment items that are in their possession, under their control or available to them within 72 hours, and that are designated by HQDA via the Maintenance Master Data File (MMDF) as reportable for maintenance. Separate measurements will be accomplished for each maintenance reportable pacing item and for all maintenance reportable equipment currently in the unit’s possession (aggregate). An R-level rating is determined for each measurement, and, subsequently, the unit’s R-level rating is determined in accordance with a methodology that considers each of these R-level measurements. Procedures are explained in the NetUSR User’s Guide and help screens. See paragraph 9–4. (4) Unit training level proficiency (T-level). Commanders of Army measured units will report the training status of their units based on the percentage of the unit’s METs trained to standard. While Army measured units also are required to determine and report additional training data (for example, required training days, squad/crew/team manning, and qualification status, and so forth) the training level is determined solely based on the results of the MET proficiency assessments associated with the unit’s core functions/designed capabilities. See paragraph 9–5. NOTE: Emphasize to students that the measurement of readiness (C-Level) is the lowest of the four major measured areas. If your P-Level, S-Level and R-Levels are all “1s”, but your T-Level is a “3”, then your C-Level is a 3. It’s a ‘Least Common Denominator’ system. Equipment and Supplies On Hand / Available (S-level) Calculated by comparing the pacing items of mission essential equipment and the total mission essential equipment items currently in the unit’s possession, under its control, or available to it within 72 hours. “On-hand”- reflects the items that are issued or are accountable to the unit within 72 hours for mission execution. “Pacing” items - those major weapon systems, aircraft and other equipment items that are central to the units’ ability to perform its core functions / designed capabilities. Training Level (T-level) Reflects the commander’s assessment of unit proficiency in the Mission Essential Tasks (METs) associated with its core functions / designed capabilities.

Check on Learning Q: What are the three metrics used to determine P-Level? Q: Unit Status Reports are comprised of what four elements? SHOW SLIDE: CHECK ON LEARNING NOTE: Conduct a check on learning and summarize the learning activity. Q: What are the three metrics used to determine P-Level? Total Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Senior Grade Composite Level Q: Unit Status Reports are comprised of what four elements? Basic Unit Information (BUI) Readiness and capabilities measurements Assessments and data points Commander’s comments SUMMARY: We have just completed Learning Activity 2. Next we will discuss Personnel Metrics and how to calculate a unit’s P-Level.

Check on Learning Q: What are the three metrics used to determine P-Level? A: Total Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Senior Grade Composite Level Q: Unit Status Reports are comprised of what four elements? A: Basic Unit Information (BUI) Readiness and capabilities measurements Assessments and data points Commander’s comments SHOW SLIDE: CHECK ON LEARNING NOTE: Conduct a check on learning and summarize the learning activity. Q: What are the three metrics used to determine P-Level? Total Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Senior Grade Composite Level Q: Unit Status Reports are comprised of what four elements? Basic Unit Information (BUI) Readiness and capabilities measurements Assessments and data points Commander’s comments SUMMARY: We have just completed Learning Activity 2. Next we will discuss Personnel Metrics and how to calculate a unit’s P-Level.

Calculate Personnel-Level (P-Level) Metrics
Equipment Readiness Equipment and Supplies Training USR SHOW SLIDE: CALCULATE PERSONNEL LEVEL (P-LEVEL) METRICS Learning Step / Activity 3. Calculate Personnel Level (P-Level) Metrics Method of Instruction: Conference / Discussion Instructor to Student Ratio: 1:36 Time of Instruction: 1hr: 20 mins Media: Large Group Instruction Now we’re going to examine how to calculate personnel level (P-Level) metrics. Although NetUSR will perform the calculations, we are going to examine how to manually calculate P-Level metrics so you understand the entire process.

Personnel Metrics and Data
Critical personnel metrics include: Required Strength Assigned Strength Percentage Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level Metrics: Readiness status measurements or assessments accomplished IAW the criteria established by AR Data Points: Measurements, assessments, or facts that do not directly support the resource measurement; however, provide specific info for management oversight or trend analysis. Determine P-Level Used to SHOW SLIDE: PERSONNEL METRICS AND DATA We report on specific personnel readiness metrics when calculating the P-Level metrics. The three metrics used to determine the P-Level are: (1) Total Deployable Strength (2) Assigned MOS Skills Match by duty position (3) Deployable Senior Grade Strength by category. It is important to understand that the USR “Least Common Denominator” logic also applies to the sub-elements of each reportable area. That is, the P-Level will be as low as the lowest of these three areas. In determining these three, you will of course need to know your required (authorized) strength, and your assigned (and attached/detached) strength. You will also report other data points (e.g., turnover percentage) and provide a number of additional reports that support the assessment. Major reporting units (“FF” level units) will sometimes add additional command-directed reporting requirements. For the purpose of explaining readiness status reporting requirements and especially for establishing policy guidelines for the security classification of readiness status information and data, various measurements and assessments addressed in this regulation are described as either “metrics” or “data points.” Metrics are the readiness status measurements or assessments accomplished IAW the criteria established by this regulation that directly support the calculations or the determinations of the resource measurements, capability assessments, and/or the overall assessments that are required to be reported. Data points are the measurements, assessments or facts that do not directly support the calculations or the determinations of the resource measurements, capability assessments, and/or the overall assessments; data points provide specific information required for management oversight or trend analysis at higher levels and/or are established for the commander‘s reference or subjective consideration while determining assessments. Metrics for Determining P-Level Deployable Senior Grade Level Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match By Category Composite 1 100% - 90% 100% - 85% % 1.54 or less 2 89% - 80% 84% - 75% % 3 79% - 70% 74% - 65% % 4 69% or less 64% or less 3.35 or more AR 220-1, Para 9-2

Required Strength Required Strength= Unit’s formal requirements (MTOE or TDA). Required strength is the baseline (denominator) for each of the three P-Level metrics. SHOW SLIDE: REQUIRED STRENGTH (AR 220-1, para 9-2b) Required strength. The required strength is established by the data entered in the requirements column of the unit‘s formal requirements and authorization document (MTOE or TDA). The required strength is the baseline (that is, the denominator) for each of the three P-level metrics. The United States Army Force Management Support Agency (USAFMSA) provides timely and accurate documentation of all Army organizations to include the mission, requirements, and authorizations for personnel and equipment through Force Management System Web (FMSWeb). FMSWeb is updated nightly and 3 times per day. FMSWeb is open to the force management community at large and anyone needing access to its products, providing they have a Common Access Card and a Government Sponsor for anyone other than active Military and Civilian personnel. NOTE: The FMSWeb button on the slide is a link to the FMSWeb site.

Assigned Strength= Soldiers currently assigned on orders to the unit
Unique Criteria for Compo 1, RC Units, AGR, and AMEDD Active Army uses eMILPO Unit Personnel Accountability Report (AAA-162) ARNG uses SIDPERS Zero Balance Report (C-27) RC units include AGR personnel scheduled to deploy with unit RC units will not include Inactive ARNG personnel or those in holding account Medical units include individuals from Professional Filler System (PROFIS) Count individuals against only one unit Accountable strength since last strength report Gains are added; losses are subtracted by the “as of” date SHOW SLIDE: ASSIGNED STRENGTH (DA PAM 220-1, Ch. 5-3) 5–3. Determining and reporting the assigned strength a. General. The assigned strength status reflects the number of personnel formally assigned to the unit by official orders. Some of the assignment criteria that are applicable to COMPO 1 units are different from the assignment criteria that are applicable to RC units, and several unique criteria apply to Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) and PROFIS personnel. This paragraph explains the procedures for determining and reporting assigned strength data in the USR, to include assigned strength reporting procedures unique to RC units and PROFIS personnel. The following basic procedures for determining and reporting assigned strength data apply to all units. (1) All units compute the assigned strength percentage by considering as “assigned” only those personnel currently assigned to the unit by official orders. (2) Personnel may be reported as being assigned by only one unit at any one time. (3) Personnel attached to a unit via temporary change of station (TCS) orders will not be included in the assigned strength data reported by that unit. (4) The assigned strength percentage equals the assigned strength divided by the required strength. The NetUSR application will import required strength data and assigned strength data from the applicable authoritative sources for reference and verification by the unit, respectively. (5) The authoritative personnel system for COMPO 1 units is the Integrated Total Army Personnel Database (ITAPDB) for USAR units it is the Regional Level Application Software (RLAS); and for ARNG units, it is Standard Installation/Division Personnel System (SIDPERS). (6) Assigned strength status is determined and reported in the USR for reference as a data point only. The assigned strength status is not a P–Level metric. (7) All personnel assigned to a reporting unit should be slotted against a valid position in the unit. The unit will fully explain the reasons for any unslotted personnel assigned. b. RC units. (1) Assigned strength for USAR units includes AGR and COMPO 1 personnel assigned on a separate TDA who would have deployed with the unit if it had been mobilized on the "as of" date of the report. (2) Inactive National Guard (ING) personnel are not included in assigned strength computations. (3) USAR AMEDD units with personnel assigned to the unit and further attached to the national AMEDD augmentee detachment (NAAD) will count those personnel as assigned. (4) USAR troop-program unit (TPU) attachments and RC Soldiers attached to units “for training only” will be included in the assigned strength data reported by their parent units. The unit of attachment will not include USAR TPU attachments or RC Soldiers “attached for training only” in the assigned strength data reported by the unit of attachment. c. PROFIS personnel. The PROFIS personnel (officer and enlisted) are AMEDD personnel formally assigned to Medical Command (MEDCOM) who currently are designated by name for attachment to a supported unit under alert, deployment, or combat conditions. When determining the assigned strength computation in the USR for PROFIS personnel, the following guidelines will be used: (1) PROFIS personnel will be included in the assigned strength data determined and reported by the MEDCOM units, to include the time periods during which the PROFIS personnel are attached for deployment to the PROFIS supported unit via TCS orders. (2) Units designated for PROFIS support, to include deploying and/or mobilizing units, will not include PROFIS personnel in their assigned strength computations. (3) Commanders of PROFIS supported units will use the current PROFIS roster from the OTSG MODS-approved PROFIS automated database to identify PROFIS personnel designated for required MTOE positions. The PROFIS roster must be updated monthly and must be dated within 30 days of the USR "as-of" date. The same PROFIS individual will not be designated for more than one unit. Assigned strength % = (Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100

Deployable 100-90% 89-80% 79-70% 69% or less
Deployable Strength Deployable Strength = The portion of the unit’s assigned strength and attachments, to include individual Soldier augmentations, that are considered deployable with the unit to accomplish the core functions and / or designed capabilities for which the unit was designed. SHOW SLIDE: DEPLOYABLE STRENGTH Previously reported as “Available” strength, for CUSR purposes, the DEPLOYABLE strength is the portion of the unit's assigned strength and attachments, to include individual Soldier augmentations that are considered deployable with the unit to accomplish the core functions/designed capabilities for which the unit is designed. The deployable strength percentage is determined by dividing the deployable strength by the required strength. As we have discussed previously, the total deployable strength percentage is one of the three P-level metrics. P-level Deployable % % % 69% or less Deployable Strength % = (Deployable Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100

Assigned MOS Skills Match
Assigned MOS Skills Match Strength= Soldiers assigned and attached who currently possess the training and skills necessary to perform effectively in the duty position currently slotted (ALARACT 110/2013). Includes: Soldiers who possess the required MOS (includes additional or secondary MOS) required by MTOE/TDA Soldiers who hold MOS formally designated or directed for substitution by HQDA Enlisted Soldiers serving in duty positions up to two grades higher or one grade lower than current grade Officers and Warrant Officers serving one grade higher and one grade lower than current grade Do not count SQI or LIC except for AMEDD personnel and authorized linguist positions SHOW SLIDE: ASSIGNED MOS SKILLS MATCH Ensuring Soldiers with the right skills are assigned to a unit is essential to readiness. Personnel readiness analysis indicates that Assigned MOS skills match is the most restrictive personnel readiness indicator of the three P-level metrics (Total Deployable Strength, Assigned MOS skills match, and Deployable Senior Grade). The assigned MOS skills match percentage reflects those assigned and attached Soldiers, who possess the training and skills necessary to perform effectively in the duty position in which the Soldier currently serves within the unit and who are currently assigned or attached in accordance with the provisions of paragraph c and detailed in DA PAM 220-1, section 5-3. The assigned MOS skills match percentage is calculated by dividing the number of assigned and attached Soldiers considered qualified for the duty position to which the soldiers currently serve in the unit, by the required strength for the respective duty position (grade/MOSC requirement) on the unit's formal authorization document (MTOE or TDA). The Soldier's qualification status is determined in accordance with the provisions of DA PAM 220-1, para 5-5. Only the Assigned MOS skills match percentage is a factor applicable to the P-level metric. For the CUSR purposes, MOSQ Soldiers serving against a duty position (grade/MOSC requirement) in excess of the number of Soldiers required for that duty position will not improve the Assigned MOS skills match percentage calculation (that is 100 percent assigned MOS skills match is the highest percentage allowed for each strength calculation by required duty position.) Assigned MOS skills match includes: Soldiers who possess the required MOS (includes additional or secondary MOS) required by MTOE / TDA. Soldiers who hold MOS formally designated or directed for substitution by HQDA. Enlisted Soldiers serving in duty positions up to two grades higher or one grade lower than current grade. Officers and Warrant Officers serving one grade higher and one grade lower than current grade. Do not count SQI or LIC except for AMEDD personnel and authorized linguist positions. Assigned MOS Skills Match= ((Assigned + Attached MOS Skill Match) ÷ Required Strength) X 100 P-level Assigned % % % 64% or less MOS Skill Match

Senior Grade Composite Level
Deployable Senior-grade composite level= Aggregation of the discrete levels for each of the five categories of senior-grade personnel: Junior NCO (E4(P) - E6) Junior Officer (O1 - O3) Senior NCO (E6(P) - E9) Senior Officer (O3(P) - O6) Warrant Officer (WO1 - CW5) Deployable Senior Grade Level By Category Composite 1 % 1.54 or less 2 % 3 % 4 64% or less 3.35 or more Composite Example Jr NCO 87% P-1+ Sr NCO 72% P-3+ WO 94% Jr Off 65% Sr Off 97% P-1 =9 9 ÷ 5 = 1.8 P-2 SHOW SLIDE: DEPLOYABLE SENIOR GRADE COMPOSITE Deployable Senior-Grade Composite Level. The deployable senior grade composite level is the level resulting from the aggregation of the discrete levels determined for each of the five categories of senior grade personnel: (1) Junior NCO (E4(P) – E6) (2) Senior NCO (E6(P) – E9) (3) Warrant officer (WO1 – CW5) (4) Junior officer (O1 – O3) (5) Senior officer (O3(P)- O6). The deployable senior grade strength percentage is determined for each applicable senior grade category by dividing the number of deployable senior grade personnel in the category by the number of senior grade position requirements applicable to that category. The senior grade requirements for each category are derived from unit‘s formal requirements and authorizations document (MTOE or TDA). Both the deployability status and the promotion status of the Soldier are considered in the determination of each senior grade category level. Commanders will consider Soldiers as senior grade based on their current promotion status. Subsequently, the senior grade composite level is determined by averaging the applicable category levels and then applying the results in a reference table to identify the composite level. NOTE: Review example on slide to ensure students understand how Deployable Senior Grade Composite is determined.

Calculate Personnel – Level (P-level)
Step 1: Assigned Strength is entered into CUSR, does not factor into P-rating Step 2: Calculations must be performed for all three personnel categories below. Each is entered into CUSR Personnel Category ASSIGNED STRENGTH A) DEPLOYABLE STRENGTH B) ASSIGNED MOS SKILLS MATCH C) DEPLOYABLE SR GRADE COMPOSITE Personnel Status Calculations (Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100 (Deployable Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100 (Assigned MOS Skills match personnel ÷ Required Strength) x 100 (Sr Grade Strength ÷ Required Senior-Grade) Strength x 100 (by category); apply percentage to reference table to determine a level for the category; average the category levels and apply to reference table to determine overall composite SG level Step 3: Unit P-Level is based on the lowest (worst case) personnel status percentage calculation. (e.g., If a unit is P1 for deployable strength and assigned MOS skills match strength, but is P3 for deployable senior grade strength, then the unit is P3) P Level Deployable Strength % Assigned MOS Skills Strength % Deployable Sr Grade Strength % P1 100-90% 100-85% P2 89-80% 84-75% P3 79-70% 74-65% P4 69% or less 64% or less SHOW SLIDE: CALCULATE PERSONNEL - LEVEL (P-LEVEL) 5–7. Determining and reporting the personnel level a. General. The Personnel level (P–Level) reported by the measured unit will coincide with the lowest level determined for the deployable strength percentage, the Assigned MOS Skills Match strength percentage and the deployable Senior Grade Composite Level in accordance with criteria in table 5–2, DA PAM Requirements for comments and other information and data are explained in paragraph 5–9. The personnel level cannot be subjectively upgraded. Note that the following procedures apply to all reporting units (Operating Force and Generating force), unless exceptional procedures have been established or formally approved by HQDA (DAMO-ODR). For example, the exceptional procedures for determining the P–Level that apply to designated TDA units are explained at the DRRS-Army Portal. b. Process. (NOTE: Updated to reflect changes in Army Directive ). (1) Automated process. The NetUSR software will auto-calculate the P–Level based on baseline data imported from authoritative data sources and the availability data entered by the unit commander. See the NetUSR Users Guide for detailed data entry instructions. (2) Manual process. The P–Level can be manually calculated as follows: (Note: The following explanation of the manual process for calculating the P–Level is for illustration only. All units must use NetUSR to prepare and submit their USRs). (a) Step 1. Use the MTOE and USR personnel deployability criteria to identify the unit’s assigned strength, required strength, deployable strength and required Assigned MOS Skills Match personnel. (b) Step 2. Calculate the assigned strength percentage. Assigned strength percentage = Assigned strength ÷ Required strength X Note that the assigned strength percentage is a data point only and is not a P–Level metric. (c) Step 3. Calculate the deployable strength percentage. Deployable strength percentage = Deployable strength ÷ Required strength X 100. Determine the deployable strength P–Level using table 5–2. (d) Step 4. Compute the deployable Assigned MOS Skills Match percentage. Assigned MOS Skills Match percentage = Deployable Assigned MOS Skills Match personnel ÷ Required Assigned MOS Skills Match personnel X 100. Determine the deployable Assigned MOS Skills Match P-level using table 5–2. (e) Step 5. Determine the deployable senior-grade composite level using the business rules in paragraph 5–6. (f) Step 6. Determine the unit’s overall P–Level. The lowest P–Level determined in steps 3, 4, and 5, above, is the unit’s overall personnel P–Level unless HQDA (DAMO–ODR) and/or the responsible ACOM/ASCC/DRU and/or DARNG/NGB, when applicable, directs or approves the use of a P–Level of P–5.

Additional Personnel Data Points
Personnel turnover percentage Assigned MOSQ strength by duty position MOS shortage report Assigned Senior-grade strength SQI, ASI, and language qualifications Soldiers Not Deploying Professional Military Education (PME) achievement milestones SHOW SLIDE: ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL DATA POINTS (DA PAM 220-1, 5-8) 5–8. Reporting personnel data points and Army unique requirements a. General. Personnel data points provide additional information regarding personnel / manning issues; however, they do not directly impact on the unit’s P–Level determination. b. Additional personnel data points. (1) Personnel turnover percentage. This data point provides an indicator of unit turmoil that could degrade unit readiness and capability. The personnel turnover percentage is calculated by dividing the total number of departures during the 3 months preceding the as-of date of the report by the assigned strength on the as-of date of the report. Compute the personnel turnover percentage by dividing the total number of departures during the 3 months preceding the as-of date of the report by the assigned strength on the as-of date: total of personnel departed (90 days) divided by Assigned strength X 100. Reassignments of personnel within the measured unit are not included in turnover computations. The personnel turnover percentage is not a P–Level metric. (2) Assigned/attached MOS Skills Match strength by duty position. The assigned/attached MOS skills match strength by duty position reflects those assigned and attached Soldiers who possess the training and skills necessary to perform effectively in the duty positions to which they are currently slotted. For USR purposes, the assigned/attached MOS Skills Match by duty position is calculated by dividing the number of assigned and attached MOS skill match Soldiers by the required strength. The assigned MOS skills match percentage is not a P–Level metric. (3) Senior-grade strength. The assigned/attached senior grade strength reflects the number of senior personnel assigned and attached to the unit (both deployable and non-deployable). The senior grade percentage is determined by dividing the number of assigned and attached commissioned officers, WOs, and NCOs (grades E–4(P) through E–9) by the number of those senior-grade personnel required in accordance with the unit’s formal requirements and authorizations document (MTOE or TDA). Commanders will report Soldiers in the grade to which they are promotable. The assigned/attached senior grade percentage is not a P–Level metric. (4) Skill qualification identifier, SSI, and language qualifications. Data points indicating these skills and qualifications are reported for all assigned and attached personnel. (5) Gender specific data points. Measured units are required to report the number of women Soldiers currently assigned/attached to the unit and the number of women Soldiers that are currently pregnant. These data points are separate requirements that provide visibility to this specific information. (6) Active Guard and Reserve data points. Measured units are required to report the number of guardsmen and reservists on active duty that are assigned to the unit. (7) Level of Professional Military Education. The NetUSR software application will import professional military education (PME) achievement data on all Soldiers assigned to reporting units with AA–Level UICs (that is, battalions and separate companies) when it imports other authoritative data from the authoritative data source (ADS). Subsequently, NetUSR will display this PME achievement data for review by the reporting unit. Commanders of reporting units will update/correct the displayed data, if necessary. However, commanders should note that the updates / corrections to the displayed PME achievement data accomplished via NetUSR are for USR purposes ONLY, and that separate actions governed by the business rules established by the ADS are necessary to correct/update the actual records possessed by the ADS. Additionally, commanders will update the PME data imported from the ADS on the Soldiers assigned to their units ONLY after they have verified via their review of official documentation that the information obtained from the ADS is inaccurate. The official documentation required to support updates/corrections by commanders to the PME status data obtained from the ADS is limited to a formal DA Form 1059s (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) and/ or official correspondence from the applicable convening authority or board that specifically establishes that the Soldier successfully completed the training/schooling or received constructive credit. Following the commander’s review and, if necessary, update/correction of the PME status data on Soldiers assigned to the unit, NetUSR will create a report reflecting the number by rank/grade of Soldiers (including commissioned officers, warrant officers and noncommissioned officers) in the unit that meet the requisite PME status level commensurate with their grade and responsibility level. Commanders of composite reporting units will review the PME achievement data reported by their subordinate elements and report aggregated PME achievement data in their composite reports. Table 5–3 and 5–4 depict the PME milestones established for each rank/grade for USR purposes. The PME milestones used in these tables do not supersede, revise or replace any requirements or guidance from HRC, DCS, G–1, or the unit’s chain of command regarding personnel policy or promotions. They simply set the data points reported by units for compilation at HQDA level to assess PME achievement across the Army. Note that adjustments to the PME milestones in tables 5–3 and 5–4 to consider time in grade/date of rank factors are planned and will be announced at the DRRS–Army portal prior to their application. Detailed reporting procedures are explained in the NetUSR User’s Guide and user help screens. DA PAM 220-1, 5-8

USR Comments (1 of 2) Precise and concise.
Thoroughly reviewed by resource managers and senior leaders at higher headquarters. Identify urgent concerns requiring immediate actions. The Commander of the reporting unit is solely responsible for: the accuracy of the information and data entered by their unit in the USR ensuring readiness deficiencies, if any, are clearly explained and are neither masked or exaggerated SHOW SLIDE: USR COMMENTS (1 OF 2) NOTE: Discuss with students how USR comments are read and acted upon at the Army level. Focus on using operational statements that highlight the impact on the unit’s ability to perform its mission. Ultimately, the commander of the reporting unit, organization, or installation is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information and data entered by his unit in the USR and for ensuring that readiness deficiencies, if any, are clearly explained and are neither masked nor exaggerated.

USR Comments (2 of 2) Good USR Comments (Specific)
Unit is currently substituting 40 excess 11B and 91D to fill 88M shortages. If unit does not receive 10-13R prior to deployment, it will be short one (1) target acquisition section. Bad USR Comments (Vague) Personnel shortages are in Combat Arms MOS. A shortage of deployable personnel is our greatest readiness concern. Unit is short drivers. We have senior grade personnel shortages. We are short intelligence and signal analysts. Unit is not filled to Army Average in signal MOS. SHOW SLIDE: USR COMMENTS (2 OF 2) NOTE: Discuss the differences between specific and vague comments on the USR. Challenge students to provide their own examples.

Check on Learning Q. What are the three metrics used to calculate P-Level? Q. What document is used to determine Required Strength? Q. What is used to determine the overall C-Level? SHOW SLIDE: CHECK ON LEARNING NOTE: Conduct a check on learning and summarize the learning activity with the students before proceeding to Learning Activity 4. Q. What are the three metrics used to calculate P-Level? A. Total Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level Q. What document is used to determine Required Strength? A. MTOE or TDA Q. Lowest rating between P,S,R,T levels (End of Learning Activity 3)

Check on Learning Q. What are the three metrics used to calculate P-Level? A. Total Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level Q. What document is used to determine Required Strength? A. MTOE or TDA Q. What is used to determine the overall C-Level? A. Lowest rating between P,S,R,T levels SHOW SLIDE: CHECK ON LEARNING NOTE: Conduct a check on learning and summarize the learning activity with the students before proceeding to Learning Activity 4. Q. What are the three metrics used to calculate P-Level? A. Total Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level Q. What document is used to determine Required Strength? A. MTOE or TDA Q. Lowest rating between P,S,R,T levels (End of Learning Activity 3)

Summary Personnel readiness and medical deployability transformation supports the Chief of Staff’s priorities. S-1s / HR professionals play a significant role in force readiness and unit status reporting. Be credible in reporting. Manage readiness at your level as you would expect it to be managed by higher headquarters. A unit’s C-Level is derived from four measured areas: PSRT The P-Level is determined by the lowest of: Deployable Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level SHOW SLIDE: SUMMARY Understanding Unit Status Reporting is critical to your success as an HR Professional. During this lesson, we examined personnel and medical readiness deployability standards, USR policies and procedures and how to calculate Personnel-Level (P-Level) metrics. Key Points to reinforce: The culture of Readiness in the Army is changing. S-1s / HR professionals play a significant role in force readiness and unit status reporting. Use the “system of record” (eMILPO/ SIDPERS) and make data accuracy a priority. Be credible in reporting. Manage readiness at your level as you would expect it to be managed by higher headquarters. Become the “subject matter expert” in strength management and personnel / medical readiness in your organization. Make higher HQ your allies.

Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Reporting (USR) C O N D I T I O N A C T I O N S T A N D A R D SHOW SLIDE: TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE NOTE: Inform the students of the Terminal Learning Objective (TLO). SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. In a training environment, leaders must perform a risk assessment in accordance with DA PAM , Risk Management. Leaders will complete a DD Form 2977 DELIBERATE RISK ASSESMENT WORKSHEET during the planning and completion of each task and sub-task by assessing mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops and support available-time available and civil considerations, (METT-TC). Local policies and procedures must be followed during times of increased heat category in order to avoid heat related injury. Consider the work/rest cycles and water replacement guidelines IAW TRADOC Regulation RISK ASSESSMENT LEVEL. Low. ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT. Environmental protection is not just the law but the right thing to do. It is a continual process and starts with deliberate planning. Always be alert to ways to protect our environment during training and missions. In doing so, you will contribute to the sustainment of our training resources while protecting people and the environment from harmful effects. Refer to FM Environmental Considerations and GTA ENVIRONMENTAL- RELATED RISK ASSESSMENT. EVALUATION: You will be evaluated at the end of the block of instruction. Students must achieve a 70% to obtain a passing score. International Officers must achieve a 60%. INSTRUCTIONAL LEAD-IN. Understanding Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report’s relationship with other HR Core Competencies and Key Functions is critical to your success as an HR Professional. During this lesson we will examine personnel and medical readiness, USR policies and procedures and preparing and processing unit status reports. This lesson provides an opportunity to reinforce the following 21st Century Soldier Competencies: (1) The Army Profession (2) Professional Competence (3) Team Building (4) Adaptability (5) Lifelong Learning 21st Century Soldier Competencies are outlined in Appendix C of TRADOC Pamphlet (The U.S. Army Learning Concept for 2015) are general areas of competence or attributes required by Students and leaders to prevail in complex, uncertain environments. Together, they provide a foundation for operational adaptability.

C O N D I T I O N A C T I O N S T A N D A R D In a classroom environment, given access to AR 220-1, DA PAM 220-1, Army Directive (Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability), eMILPO Training Database, USR personnel and medical readiness data, and awareness of Operational Environment (OE) variables and actors. NOTE: See Slide #2 to inform students of the TLO requirements.

Met when students: Assess the personnel and medical readiness deployability standards of unit personnel. Review USR personnel readiness data and HQDA reporting policies. Calculate the unit’s overall Personnel Level (P-Level). C O N D I T I O N A C T I O N S T A N D A R D NOTE: See Slide #2 to inform students of the TLO requirements.

Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report (USR)

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report (USR)"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report (USR)

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Report (USR)"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback