Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded areas) for associations between the logarithms of past doses of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure and cancer incidence (A) and all-cause mortality (B) among persons with congenital heart disease (2-year-lagged analysis), Quebec, Canada, 1995–2010. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 07 June 2019, Pages 1552–1562, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 2. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 2. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded areas) for associations between the logarithms of past doses of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure and cancer incidence (left panels) and all-cause mortality (right panels) for men (A and B) and women (C and D) with congenital heart disease (2-year-lagged analysis), Quebec, Canada, 1995–2010. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 07 June 2019, Pages 1552–1562, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3. Adjusted hazard ratios from the final model (2-year-lagged analysis of associations between the logarithms of ... Figure 3. Adjusted hazard ratios from the final model (2-year-lagged analysis of associations between the logarithms of past doses of low-dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) exposure and cancer incidence) for selected hypothetical patterns of LDIR received at 2 different times in the past 9 years, relative to patients with no LDIR procedures in the past 9 years, among men (A) and women (B) with congenital heart disease, 1995–2010. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 188, Issue 8, 07 June 2019, Pages 1552–1562, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.


Download ppt "Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google