Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient breast tumor cell lines. Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient breast tumor cell lines. Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient."— Presentation transcript:

1 Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient breast tumor cell lines.
Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient breast tumor cell lines. A, Western blot illustrating E-cadherin expression in 37 breast tumor cell lines (including MCF7 as positive control). Cell line names are color-coded according to the presence of CDH1 gene mutations, gene deletion events, or CDH1 promoter hypermethylation events. Uncropped Western blot images are shown in Supplementary Fig. S20. B, Schematic illustrating breast tumor cell line cohort sizes used to interrogate siRNA sensitivity screens (19). C, Bar chart illustrating E-cadherin expression of a subset of the breast tumor cell lines shown in A, determined by mass spectrometry, described in ref. 20. Western blot classification of E-cadherin status from A is shown. D, Scatter plot illustrating CDH1 mRNA expression levels in breast tumor cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia dataset (51). E, Volcano plot of data from the siRNA SMARTpool sensitivity screens described in B. Blue dot highlights ROS1 siRNA identified in the screen as selectively targeting E-cadherin–defective cells. F, REVEALER analysis identifies E-cadherin status as an important determinant of ROS1 siRNA sensitivity. Heat map illustrates the REVEALER output identifying complementary genomic alterations associated with ROS1 siRNA sensitivity in the 34 breast tumor cell line panel described in B. IC scores and nominal P values with respect to the target are shown on the right side of the heat map. E-cadherin status demonstrated the most profound IC score −0.5 from 23 molecular features examined. G and H, Box whisker plots illustrating foretinib (G) or crizotinib (H) sensitivity in 12 breast tumor cell lines, defined by log2 AUC values. Individual AUC values are listed in Supplementary Table S8. Log2 AUC values for SLC34A2–ROS1 translocation-positive HCC78 cells are shown as a positive control. **, P = 0.003, Student t test; *, P value = 0.035, Student t test. WT, wild-type. I, Volcano plot of drug sensitivity effects in ex vivo cultured breast cancer explants (27) annotated according to CDH1 gene copy-number. Red dot highlights crizotinib as selectively targeting explants with CDH1 gene copy-number loss. Median AUC in explants with CDH1 copy-number loss = , median AUC in explants without CDH1 copy-number loss = 0.138, P = Y-axis shows adjusted P value (−log10) from a t test comparing AUC in ex vivo explant models with CDH1 loss versus models with no CDH1 copy-number change. X-axis shows the negative value of the t statistic describing the difference in AUC means for ex vivo explant models with CDH1 loss versus models with no CDH1 copy-number change. Negative values suggest drug sensitivity in ex vivo explant models with CDH1 loss versus models with no CDH1 copy-number change. Ilirjana Bajrami et al. Cancer Discov 2018;8: ©2018 by American Association for Cancer Research


Download ppt "Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient breast tumor cell lines. Synthetic lethality of ROS1 inhibition in E-cadherin–deficient."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google