Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLærke Markussen Modified over 5 years ago
1
Endovascular-assisted versus conventional in situ saphenous vein bypass grafting: Cumulative patency, limb salvage, and cost results in a 39-month multicenter study David Rosenthal, MD, Elias J. Arous, MD, Steven G. Friedman, MD, Michael D. Ingegno, MD, Brad L. Johnson, MD, Larry W. Kraiss, MD, John D. Martin, MD, Mark W. Moritz, MD, Giancarlo Piano, MD, Edward E. Rigdon, MD, Stephen B. Self, MD, L.Laszlo Pallos, PhD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000) DOI: /S (00) Copyright © 2000 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 Primary patency rates for conventional (CISB) and endovascular (EISB) in situ bypass grafting procedures. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60-68DOI: ( /S (00) ) Copyright © 2000 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Secondary patency rates for conventional (CISB) and endovascular (EISB) in situ bypass grafting procedures. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 60-68DOI: ( /S (00) ) Copyright © 2000 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.