1. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in the context of Faculty Development
This workshop is a pilot for a workshop we will be presenting at AMEE this coming September in Ottawa.
Anne McKee (King’s College London)
Pat O’ Sullivan (UCSF)
Maria Blanco (Tufts)
Toni Ungaretti (John Hopkins)

2. Relevance
What is the role of Faculty Development in: supporting medical educators address the needs of diverse learners, recruited to better reflect the patient populations they will serve?

3. Workshop Aims Within Faculty Development
Explore how DEI is understood and promoted.
Engage the SDRME community in shaping needed research.
Timing: 4 minutes max for the first 3 slides.
I would like to collect details of those interested in engaging in tis work – perhaps best dome at the end of the workshop.
WE begin with an exemplar from ucsf.

4. UCSF as an exemplar
Pat – let me know when you want me to describe the policy/practice levels below.
The UCSF exemplar is interesting.
At the top of the institution the senior leadership team committed the university to address issues of DEI in their ‘Differences Matters’ policy.
At the university wide level, DEI Inclusion Champion Training engages colleagues across the university understanding the UCSF approach.
At the local level, Faculty Development supports educators design and deliver DEI sensitive teaching.

7. Equitable Assessment:
Teach for UCSF:
Certificate in Teaching for Equity and Inclusion
Equitable Assessment
Selecting Curricula for Equity and Inclusion
Exploring Similarities and Differences for an Equitable Learning Environment
Managing Micro-Aggressions
Proactive and Reactive Strategies in Equitable Teaching
Equitable Assessment:
Developing assessment practices so all learners can succeed
The three UCSF slides should take minutes.
Kate Lupton, MD
E. Alexandra Brown, MD
April 2, 2019
11/16/2019
[ADD PRESENTATION TITLE: INSERT TAB > HEADER & FOOTER > NOTES AND HANDOUTS]

8. Task 1
What are the current challenges and good practices within your institution?
Drawing upon the UCSF example, at what levels in your institutions might these be appropriately addressed?
Deliverable:
Take one challenge and design a way to address it (perhaps draw on good practices)
Small Group Work. 15 Minutes
We have Toni and Maria down to do a de-brief. Let’s describe this further.
This is what I think we agreed.
In the group tasks we ask that you identify a challenge – then develop a strategy to address it– then frame a research question to guide research in FD
5 minutes for Question 1 and 5 Minutes for Question 2. :
I like the deliverable here but wonder if there is sufficient time to do it justice?
We had agreed that the deliverable was : what are the three most common challenges identified within your group.
Once the group work begins I think we need to circulate around groups to guide the task

9. Task 2.
For the identified challenge, what research question about faculty development do you want to address?
Deliverable: One good research question!
This is more achievable in 15 minutes
Prompts we talked about on our call:
What are some of the interesting questions your group is thinking about?
What kind of research question would help you address that challenge in FD?
What will work in your culture?

10. Report out from Tasks 1 and 2
Your challenge and the way to address it.
Deliverable – Your one good research question.

11. Sharing your thinking. Please email:
Maria Blanco with your Report out:
Anne McKee if you would like to know more about this work :
Do we need this?