Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work"— Presentation transcript:

1 Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
V.S. Morozov Teleconference on Nonlinear Dynamics August 4, 2015 F. Lin

2 Nonlinear Parameter Study Continued
Phase advance between the h and v sextupoles adjusted to exactly /2 in both planes Phase advance from IP to sextupoles adjusted to exactly (n+1/2) in appropriate planes W minimized at IP using “non-linear” sextupoles x,y = 1 using “linear” sextuples Betatron tunes: x = 25.22, y = 23.16 No significant improvement IP

3 Some Non-Linear Parameters
Chromaticities dnux/dp = e-01; dnux/dp2 = e+03; dnux/dp3 = e+06 dnuy/dp = e-01; dnuy/dp2 = e+03; dnuy/dp3 = e+06 Chromatic  function dependence dbetax/dp (m) = e-02; dbetay/dp (m) = e-02 Non-linear dispersion etax2 (m) = e+00; etax3 (m) = e+02 etay2 (m) = e+00; etay3 (m) = e+00 Tune dependence on amplitudes dnux/dJx (1/m) = e+02; dnux/dJy (1/m) = e+04; dnuy/dJy (1/m) = e+02 1st-order driving terms h11001 = e+01; h00111 = e+01; h10100 = e+00; h10010 = e+00; h21000 (1/m1/2) = e-02; h30000 (1/m1/2) = e-03; h10110 (1/m1/2) = e+01; h10020 (1/m1/2) = e+01; h10200 (1/m) = e+00; h20001 = e+00; h00201 = e+01; h10002 (1/m1/2) = e+00; 2nd-order driving terms h22000 (1/m) = e+02; h11110 (1/m) = e+04; h00220 (1/m) = e+02; h31000 (1/m) = e+01; h40000 (1/m) = e+02; h20110 (1/m) = e+03; h11200 (1/m) = e+04; h20020 (1/m) = e+03; h20200 (1/m) = e+03; h00310 (1/m) = e+02; h00400 (1/m) = e+01

4 What Is the Issue? Second order amplitude dependent tune shift
Consider a single CCB (the downstream one) with N = 3 h/v sextuple cross-talk within a single CCB explains the large x/Jy value: (x/Jy)21 and (x/Jy)23 independent of tune and add up x/Jy j Total 1 2 3 k 223.0 -223.0 -20.0

5 Conclusions & Outlook There seems to be a fundamental problem with the CCB scheme There appear to be no phase advance combination that would cancel sextupole contributions to x/Jy Additional sextupole(s) needed, this then starts resembling –I sext pair scheme x/Jy is the hardest to compensate with octupoles, would require three of them Important lesson: phase advance between sextupole pairs matters Further work Present a side by side comparison to the collaboration and make a down selection Get non-interleaved –I sextupole pair optics from SLAC for further studies Continue optimization Continue error studies Start thinking about the electron ring


Download ppt "Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google