Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources Third Edition

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources Third Edition"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources Third Edition
Robert W. Strayer Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources Third Edition CHAPTER 14 Economics Transformations: Commerce and Consequence 1450–1750 Copyright © 2016 by Bedford/St. Martin’s Distributed by Bedford/St. Martin's/Macmillan Higher Education strictly for use with its products; Not for redistribution.

2

3 I. Europeans and Asian Commerce
A. A Portuguese Empire of Commerce 1. Indian Ocean Commerce: rich, diverse, peaceful 2. Portuguese took to piracy on sea lanes 3. Portuguese created a “trading post empire” 4. Portuguese gradually assimilated to Indian Ocean trade patterns I. Europeans and Asian Commerce A Portuguese Empire of Commerce Indian Ocean commerce: very rich, ethnically diverse, peaceful. Portuguese did not have goods of a quality for effective competition. Portuguese took to piracy on the sea lanes : Portuguese ships were more maneuverable, carried cannons; established fortified bases at key locations (Mombasa, Hormuz, Goa, Malacca, Macao). Portuguese created a “trading post empire”: goal was to control commerce, not territories or populations; operated by force of arms, not economic competition; at height, controlled about half of the spice trade to Europe. Portuguese gradually assimilated to Indian Ocean trade patterns: carried Asian goods to Asian ports, many Portuguese settled in Asian or African ports, their trading post empire was in steep decline by 1600.

4

5

6 I. Europeans and Asian Commerce
B. Spain and the Philippines 1. Spanish base in Philippines: first to challenge Portugal’s control of Asian trade 2. Major missionary campaign: only major Christian outpost in Asia 3. Forced relocation, tribute, taxes, unpaid labor 4. Manila: major center with diverse population 5. Chinese population essential to colonial trade system I. Europeans and Asian Commerce B. Spain and the Philippines Spain was the first to challenge Portugal’s control of Asian trade. Establishment of a Spanish base in the Philippines: first encountered when Ferdinand Magellan circumnavigated the globe (1519–1521). Philippines were organized in small, competitive chiefdoms; run from colonial Mexico, the Spanish conquest was relatively easy and often bloodless, as local leaders were bought off with gifts, joined alliances, or defeated with gunpowder weapons .The Philippines remained a Spanish colonial territory until 1898, when the United States assumed control. Major missionary campaign made Filipino society the only major Christian outpost in Asia. Spaniards introduced forced relocation, tribute, taxes, unpaid labor: large estates for Spanish settlers, religious orders, and Filipino elite, women’s ritual and healing roles were attacked. Manila became a major center with a diverse population. Chinese population: essential to the colonial trade system, resisted conversion to Catholicism and occasionally revolted, Spanish expulsions and massacres: 20,000 killed in 1603.

7 I. Europeans and Asian Commerce
C. The East India Companies 1. Dutch and English displace Portuguese ca Established their own trading post empires 3. Dutch East India Company 4. British East India Company 5. “Carrying trade” within Asia I. Europeans and Asian Commerce C. The East India Companies Dutch and English both entered Indian Ocean commerce in the early seventeenth century: soon displaced the Portuguese, competed with each other. ca. 1600: both the Dutch and the English organized private trading companies to handle Indian Ocean trade: merchants invested, shared the risks; Dutch and British East India companies were chartered by their respective governments; later, France created a company; had power to make war and govern conquered peoples. Established their own trading post empires: Dutch empire was focused on Indonesia, English empire was focused on India, French company was also established. Dutch East India Company: monopolized both shipping and production of cloves, cinnamon, nutmeg, and mace; seized small spice-producing islands and forced people to sell only to the Dutch; destroyed the local economy of the Spice Islands; made the Dutch rich; colonized Taiwan through large-scale Chinese immigration, 1624–1662, but lost control to China; killed, enslaved, or starved 15,000 on Banda Island. British East India Company: was not as well financed or as commercially sophisticated as the Dutch; couldn’t break into the Spice Islands; established three major trade settlements in India (seventeenth century): Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras; British navy gained control of Arabian Sea and Persian Gulf; could not compete with the Mughal Empire on land; negotiated with local rulers for peaceful establishment of trade bases; Britons traded pepper and other spices, but cotton textiles became more important. Dutch and English also became involved in “carrying trade” within Asia; both gradually evolved into typical colonial domination.

8

9 I. Europeans and Asian Commerce
D. Asians and Asian Commerce 1. European presence less significant in Asia 2. Siam expelled the French in Japan 4. Asian merchants I. Europeans and Asian Commerce D. Asians and Asian Commerce European presence was much less significant in Asia than in Americas or Africa. Europeans were no real military threat to great powers in Asia. Siam able to expel the French in 1688. Japan: Portuguese reached Japan in the mid-sixteenth century; Japan at the time was divided by constant conflict among feudal lords (daimyo) supported by samurai; at first, Europeans were welcome, but Japan unified politically under the Tokugawa shogun in the early seventeenth century (Increasingly regarded Europeans as a threat to unity, expulsion of missionaries, massive persecution of Christians,Japanese were barred from travel abroad, Europeans were banned, except the Dutch at a single site). Japan was closed off from Europe from 1650 to 1850 but remained connected to China, Korea, and Southeast Asia. Wave of Japanese merchants moved into Southeast Asia in 17th century: used violent means similar to Europeans, Japanese government refused to support these merchants and their criminal behavior, unlike the European states. Asian merchants continued to operate, despite European presence: overland trade within Asia remained in Asian hands. tens of thousands of Indian merchants lived throughout Central Asia, Persia, and Russia.

10 III. Silver and Global Commerce
Silver trade important to global exchange network China’s huge economy demanded silver “Silver drain” to Asia Influx of silver caused inflation Silver vastly enriched the Spanish monarchy Silver trade important to global exchange network: The silver trade was even more important than the spice trade in creating a global exchange network. Enormous silver deposits were discovered in Bolivia and Japan in the mid-sixteenth century. In the early modern period, Spanish America produced around 85 percent of the world’s silver. China’s huge economy demanded silver: China’s economy was huge and had a growing demand for silver. 1570s: the Chinese government consolidated taxes into a single tax to be paid in silver. The value of silver skyrocketed, foreigners with silver could purchase more Chinese products than before. In China, silver further commercialized the country’s economy. People needed to sell something to obtain silver to pay their taxes, economy became more regionally specialized, deforestation was a growing problem; wasn’t addressed as it was in Japan. “Silver drain” to Asia: Silver was central to world trade. “Silver drain” to Asia: bulk of the world’s silver supply ended up in China (most of the rest reached other parts of Asia), Spanish silver brought to Europe was used to buy Asian goods, silver bought African slaves and Asian spices, the Spanish “piece of eight” was widely used for international exchange. Potosí, Bolivia, became the largest city in the Americas (population: 160,000) because it was at the world’s largest silver mine: the city’s wealthy European elite lived in luxury, Native American miners lived in horrid conditions, women found some new economic opportunities. Europeans were essentially middlemen in world trade: funneled American silver to Asia, Asian commodities took market share from European products. Influx of silver caused inflation: Combined with the climate fluctuations of the Little Ice Age to cause the general crisis in the 17th century. Silver vastly enriched Spain and Japan: Silver vastly enriched the Spanish monarchy: caused inflation, not real economic growth in Spain, Spanish economy was too rigid, Spanish aristocrats were against economic enterprise. Spain lost its dominance when the value of silver fell ca Japanese government profited more from silver production than did Spain. Tokugawa shoguns used silver revenues to defeat rivals and unify the country, worked with the merchant class to develop a market-based economy, heavy investment in agriculture and industry, averted ecological crisis, limited population growth.

11

12

13 IV. “The World Hunt:” Fur in Global Commerce
Europe’s supply of fur-bearing animals diminished by 1500 Intense competition for the furs of North America North American fur trade Native Americans dependent on European trade goods Russian fur trade IV. “The World Hunt:” Fur in Global Commerce Europe’s supply of fur-bearing animals was sharply diminished by 1500: Little Ice Age in Europe increased demand for furs, Great Dying in North America led to an increase in forest habitats for fur-bearing animals. Intense competition for furs of North America: There was intense competition for the furs of North America. French were prominent in St. Lawrence valley, Great Lakes, and along the Mississippi, British traders moved into Hudson Bay region, Dutch moved into what is now New York. North American fur trade: Europeans usually traded with Indians for furs or skins, rather than hunting or trapping animals themselves. Environmental impact: beaver and other furry animals were driven to near extinction, Native American sources commented on impact. By the 1760s, hunters in the southeastern British colonies took around 500,000 deer every year. Trade was profitable for the Indians: received many goods of real value, Huron chiefs enhanced their authority with control of European goods, but Indians fell prey to European diseases, fur trade generated much higher levels of inter-Indian warfare, Iroquois began producing ginseng for export to China. Native Americans became dependent on European trade goods: iron tools and cooking pots, gunpowder weapons, European textiles. As a result, many traditional crafts were lost, many animal species were depleted through overhunting, deeply destructive power of alcohol on Indian societies. Implications of fur trade for Native American women: many native women married European traders facilitating cross-cultural exchange; in native societies the status of men was enhanced by the focus on hunting. Some new opportunities arose for women in the production of wild rice and maple syrup. Russian fur trade. Profits of fur trade were the chief incentive for Russian expansion. Had a similar toll on native Siberians as it had on Indians, dependence on Russian goods, depletion of fur-bearing animal populations. Russians didn’t have competition, so they forced Siberians to provide furs instead of negotiating commercial agreements. Private Russian hunters and trappers competed directly with Siberians.

14

15

16

17 V. Commerce in People: The Atlantic Slave Trade
A. The Slave Trade in Context 1. Most human societies have had slaves 2. Many forms of slavery 3. Distinctiveness of slavery in the Americas 4. Origins of Atlantic slavery 5. Africans became primary source of slave labor for the Americas V. Commerce in People: The Atlantic Slave Trade A. The Slave Trade in Context Most human societies have had slaves. Africans had practiced slavery and sold slaves for centuries; trans-Saharan trade took slaves to the Mediterranean world, East African slave trade since seventh century, Islamic slave trade resulted in many Africans living outside of the continent. Slavery took many forms, depending on the region and time period: Indian Ocean slaves were often assimilated into their owners’ households, children of slaves were sometimes free, sometimes slaves, Islamic world preferred female slaves and slaves for domestic work; Atlantic slave trade favored male slaves for plantation work, not all slaves had lowly positions (in Islamic world, many slaves had military or political status), most premodern slaves worked in households, farms, or shops. Distinctiveness of slavery in the Americas: the scale and importance of the slave trade in the Americas was enormous, largely based on plantation agriculture, with slaves denied any rights at all, slave status was inherited, little hope of manumission, widespread slavery in society that valued human freedom and equality—unlike anywhere else except maybe ancient Greece, slavery was wholly identified with Africa and with “blackness.” Origins of Atlantic slavery lay in the Mediterranean and with sugar production: sugar production was the first “modern” industry (major capital investment, technology, disciplined workers, mass market), the work was very difficult and dangerous—slaves were ideal, at first, Slavs from the Black Sea region provided most slaves for Mediterranean sugar plantations. Portuguese found an alternative slave source in West Africa. Africans became the primary source of slave labor for the Americas, Slavs weren’t available, Indians died of European diseases, Europeans were a bad alternative: Christians from marginal lands couldn’t be enslaved; indentured servants were expensive, Africans were farmers, had some immunity to diseases, were not Christian, and were readily available, long debate on how much racism was involved.

18 V. Commerce in People: The Atlantic Slave Trade
B. The Slave Trade in Practice 1. Slave trade driven by European demand 2. Increasing pace of Atlantic slave trade 3. Who was enslaved? 4. Vary majority of slaves in Brazil and the Caribbean 5. Various forms of resistance IV. “The World Hunt:” Fur in Global Commerce B. The Slave Trade in Practice Slave trade was driven by European demand, but Europeans didn’t raid Africa for slaves; they traded freely with African merchants and elites. From the capture to the sale on the coast, trade was in African hands. Africans received trade goods in return, often bought with American silver. It was a harrowing journey for the slave Increasing pace of Atlantic slave trade: between 1450 and 1600, fewer than 4,000 slaves were shipped annually; in the seventeenth century, average of 10,000 slaves per year taken to the Americas. Who was enslaved: people from West and South-Central Africa (present-day Mauritania to Angola), mostly people from marginal groups (prisoners of war, debtors, criminals), Africans generally did not sell their own peoples. Vast majority of slaves ended up in Brazil and the Caribbean: smaller numbers North America, mainland Spanish America or in Europe. About 15 percent of those enslaved died during the Middle Passage. Various forms of resistance: from slow work to outright rebellion, Maroon societies. Escaped slaves mixed with Native Americans, Palmares in Brazil: 10,000 or more people, Haitian Revolution, 1790s.

19

20 V. Commerce in People: The Atlantic Slave Trade
C. Consequences: The Impact of the Slave Trade in Africa 1. Slowed Africa’s growth 2. Social effects 3. Women participated in state-building enterprises 4. Effect of slave trade varied in places IV. “The World Hunt:” Fur in Global Commerce C. Consequences: The Impact of the Slave Trade in Africa Created new transregional linkages. Slowed Africa’s growth, while Europe and China expanded in population. Sub-Saharan Africa had about 18 percent of the world’s population in 1600 but only 6 percent in Slave trade generated economic stagnation and political disruption in Africa: those who profited in the trade did not invest in production, did not generate breakthroughs in agriculture or industry—since Europeans didn’t increase demand for Africa’s products, just for its people. Social effects: fostered moral corruption, unbalanced sex ratios in Africa, increased substantially labor demands on women, led to more polygamous households, led to the increased use of female slaves in West Africa, a few women benefited by marrying European merchants, with some operating their own trading empires. Women participated in several state-building enterprises: Kingdom of Dahomey was ruled over by a Queen Mother, in the kingdom of Kongo, women held lower administrative positions and served on the monarch’s council of advisers, Matamba also had female rulers. Effect of slave trade differed from place to place: many small-scale kinship-based societies were thoroughly disrupted, some larger kingdoms such as Kongo and Oyo slowly disintegrated, Benin in the forest area of present day Nigeria succeeded in limiting the effects of the slave trade until the 1700s: Diversified its exports and bought firearms and other goods, banned export of male slaves, only with decline in 1700s did Benin reengage in the slave trade. Dahomey actively participated in slave trade during the early 1700s, but under royal control: annual slave raids by the army, government depended on slave trade for revenue.

21

22

23

24

25


Download ppt "Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources Third Edition"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google