Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data

Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data
Human Resources (HR) Technician Warrant Officer Advanced Course Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data A D J U T A N T G E N E R A L S C H O O L

Terminal Learning Objective
Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data A C T I O N C O N D I T I O N S T A N D A R D

A C T I O N Senior HR Technicians in a classroom environment, given access to AR Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration-Consolidated Policies, DA PAM Defense Readiness Reporting System- Army Procedures, Personnel Readiness Summary Guide, ADP/ADRP 7-0 Training Units and Developing Leaders and awareness of Operational Environment (OE), variables and actors. C O N D I T I O N S T A N D A R D

A C T I O N Students will meet the standards when they are able to interpret, analyze and brief USR data based on the following activities: Analyze Personnel and Medical Readiness Deployability status of subordinate brigades. 2. Review USR Personnel Data for Subordinate Units. 3. Prepare USR Personnel and Medical Readiness USR Assessment Brief / Report for the commander. C O N D I T I O N S T A N D A R D

Non-deployable Report (RA)
As of 30 Jun 18, 41K Soldiers (9%) in the Regular Army (RA) were Non-deployable 35K (85%) were Medical; excluding MRC 4, the Non-deployable rate for the RA drops to 7% Regular Army Snapshot Non-deployable % (RA by force/unit type) RA Strength (Jun 18): 468,331 RA Non-deployable rate overall - 9% BCTs (8%) and CABs (8.8%) rates in BCTs Higher Non-deployable rates in Generating Force Non-deployable Trends (Jun 16 – Jun 18) Non-deployable As of date RA Non-deployable (EOM Jun 18): 41,279 (8.81%) 30 Jun 18 ↓ 1,256 since last month: 42,535 (9.13%) 31 May 18 ↓20,310 since implementing AD * 61,589 (13.07%) 30 Jun 18 *Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability Soldiers are “binned” at SSN level into ONLY the first bin that applies: TTHS/Training Pipeline, Deployed, Non deployable, Deployable. Data is as of 30 Jun 18

“Readiness is my #1 priority.”
Bottom Line Up Front “Readiness is my #1 priority.” GEN Mark A. Milley, CSA The culture of Readiness in the Army is changing. Commanders and health care providers are collaborating to improve the health, welfare, and deployability of Soldiers. SHOW SLIDE: BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT KEY POINTS The culture of Readiness in the Army is changing. Commanders and health care providers are collaborating to improve the health, welfare, and deployability of Soldiers. Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability Transformation supports the Chief of Staff’s #1 priority. This effort is both revolutionary and evolutionary in all aspects. The overhaul is essential and highly impactful. The S-1 plays a key role assisting and supporting commanders and healthcare professionals. Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability Transformation supports the Chief of Staff’s #1 priority. This effort is both revolutionary and evolutionary in all aspects. The overhaul is essential and highly impactful. The S-1 plays a key role assisting and supporting commanders and healthcare professionals. There is no greater priority than Readiness!

Medical Readiness Classes (MRC)
Short Definition Medical Definition CDR Deployability Determination MRC 1 Medically Ready / Deployable All medical requirements met. Soldiers categorized as “Green” in MEDPROS. Meets all Medical Readiness Requirements and Dental Readiness Class 1 or 2 – Temp Profile ≤ 7 days Not required MRC 2 Partially Medically Ready / Deployable Any deficiencies correctable during final Soldier Readiness Program. Soldier is deficient in one of the following: – Temp Profile between 8 and 14 days inclusive – Hearing Readiness Class 4 (current within 13 months) – Vision Readiness Class 4 (current within 15 months) – DNA (Drawn/ on file with DoD Repository) – HIV (Drawn / validated with DoD Repository) – Immunizations current or valid exception (Routine Adult Immunization Profile) – HepA, HepB, TDA, MMR, Polio, Varicella, (Influenza-seasonal) – Individual Medical Equipment (1MI, 2 pair eye glasses, MCEP-I, MWT, and Hearing Aid w/batteries, if required Not required. MRC 3 Not Medically Ready Commander determines Deployability for: – Temp Profile >14 Days (DL1) – Dental Readiness Class 3 (DL2) Soldiers are categorized as “Red” in MEDPROS. Deployment Limiting Condition (DL). Soldier is deficient in one of the following: DL 1– Temp Profile > 14 days DL 2– Dental Readiness Class 3 DL 3– Pregnancy or post-partum DL 4– Permanent profile indicating an MOS Administrative Retention Review (MAR2) action is needed DL 5– Permanent profile indicating a MEB action is needed DL 6– Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is needed DL 7– Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X) DL 1 / 2: Soldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable; commander determines Deployability. DL 3 / 4 / 5 / 6: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by commander and by policy. DL 7: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by the commander. Upon receipt of an assigned mission, may request COCOM waivers. MRC 4 Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable and CDR determines Deployability (default Non-Deployable) Soldiers are categorized as “Grey” in MEDPROS. Status is unknown. – No current periodic health assessment (PHA). – No current dental screen. Soldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable Commander determines Deployability. SHOW SLIDE: MEDICAL READINESS CATEGORIES The following are the new Medical Readiness Classes (MRCs) and Deployment-Limiting (DL) codes. The simplified MRCs include only two categories of Soldiers who are not medically ready to deploy: MRC 3 and MRC 4. MRCs 3A and 3B were consolidated into the new MRC 3, which will include seven new DLs to increase transparency and detail. Commanders are required to determine whether Soldiers with MRC 3, DL 1 and 2 and MRC 4 medical conditions are deployable. These determinations will remain in the Commander’s Portal for revalidation every month. MRC 1. This class of Soldiers is fully medically ready and deployable, and includes individuals with temporary profiles up to 7 days in length. This class also includes Soldiers with completed medical or administrative board actions who have no deployment-limiting physical category codes and have: (1) Returned to duty without any board indicated; or (2) Had their area of concentration (AOC)/military occupational specialty (MOS) reclassified; or (3) Received a U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Fit Memorandum, which documents that the Soldier received a “fit” finding from a Physical Evaluation Board. MRC 2. This class of Soldiers is partially medically ready and deployable, and includes Soldiers with profiles from 8 to 14 days in length. MRC 2 Soldiers include those whose vision or hearing is classified as class 4 (MRC 2 are deployable in MODS). MRC 3. This class of Soldiers is not medically ready and will default to nondeployable. (1) Within this class of Soldiers, commanders will determine in the Commander’s Portal whether a Soldier with DL code 1 or 2 is deployable after reviewing the Soldier’s physical profile. Medical conditions that cause Soldiers to be coded as DL 2 must be corrected before the Soldiers can deploy. (2) Additionally, Soldiers with DL 7 codes are not medically ready and cannot deploy without a waiver from the combatant commander. MRC 4. This class of Soldiers is not medically ready and will default to nondeployable unless a commander determines in the Commander’s Portal that a Soldier is deployable. Commanders are required to resolve any medical deficiencies before a Soldier’s deployment. Each month, commanders will evaluate and determine whether Soldiers in this class are deployable and will make every effort to address the underlying causes of a Soldier’s indeterminate MRC 4 status. Army Directive

Deployment-Limiting Codes
Description Reference: SECARMY Directive , Table 1 1 Temp Profile > 14 days 2 Dental Readiness Class 3 3 Pregnancy 4 Permanent profile indicating a MAR2 action needed 5 Permanent profile indicating a MEB action needed 6 Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is needed 7 Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X) SHOW SLIDE: DEPLOYMENT-LIMITING CODES NOTE: Review Deployment-Limiting Codes. Facilitate discussion and answer any questions, as needed.

Non-Deployable USR Categories and Reason Codes
Medical Readiness Classifications MR1 - fully medically ready MR2 – medically ready within 72 hours MR3A – medically ready within 30 days MR3B - more than 30 days to correct MR4 – indeterminate status Administrative Categories Arrest and confinement (LR) Pending military/civil court action (LZ) Under military/civil/criminal investigation (LI) Pending admin/legal discharge/separation (LD) AWOL (AW) Deployed Category (DP) Dental Readiness (DR) Temporary Change of Station (TCS) Postpartum Operational Deferment (PD) Adoption (PA) Minimum TNG not complete (TN) Family Care Plan (FP) Lautenberg Amendment (LA) Missing/POW (MP) Sole Surviving Family Member (SS) Soldier under 18 (CS) Ordinary Leave/TDY (LT) Transition Leave (LS) Conscientious Objector (CO) PROFIS category RC and Multi-Compo Units Only Assigned, not joined (AN) Unsatisfactory participant (UP) Simultaneous Membership Program (SM) ARNG–Assuming TTADS/PRC USAR–Assuming TTADS/PRC; Designated Critical List USAR – Education Career Stabilization (EC) NOTE: Not all categories and non-availability reason codes will apply to every force structure component. Refer to Table 5-1, DA PAM 220-1, to review notes and exceptions to determine personnel availability.

Commander’s Unit Status Report (CUSR)
The CUSR is intended to be a “commander’s report,” reflecting the commander’s personal judgments and assessments regarding the mission readiness of the unit. Reports are prepared by commanders or their designated representatives and routinely submitted through administrative control (ADCON) channels to HQDA. The CUSR is not a performance report card and should not be used as a tool to evaluate or compare the accomplishments of organizations or those of their commanders. All commanders at all times will submit timely, accurate and complete reports that neither exaggerate nor mask their units’ readiness deficiencies. No commander is expected to report readiness levels that are inconsistent with resources made available to the unit. ADCON authorities at higher levels will review reports to ensure that they comply with regulatory requirements. SHOW SLIDE 11: CDR’S UNIT STATUS REPORT (CUSR) The CUSR is intended to be a “commander’s report,” reflecting the commander’s personal judgments and assessments regarding the mission readiness of the unit. (1) Reports are prepared by commanders or their designated representatives and routinely submitted through administrative control (ADCON) channels to HQDA. (2) The CUSR is not a performance report card and should not be used as a tool to evaluate or compare the accomplishments of organizations or those of their commanders. (3) All commanders at all times will submit timely, accurate and complete reports that neither exaggerate nor mask their units’ readiness deficiencies. (4) No commander is expected to report readiness levels that are inconsistent with resources made available to the unit (5) ADCON authorities at higher levels will review reports to ensure that they comply with regulatory requirements. Status Updates Briefed Monthly to Army Senior Leadership

USR Reporting Basics Active units submit Regular reports monthly
Reporting Units -- BATTALION I I Unit level reports are submitted from detachments, separate companies, battalions, consolidated by brigade. Composite level reports are submitted at the division and separate brigade level. Commander considers all units assigned within the organizational structure and assesses overall readiness. DIVISION XX Measured Areas -- Status of 4 primary areas (PSRT) Personnel (P) Equipment and Supplies on-hand / available (S) Equipment Readiness / Serviceability (R) Unit Training Proficiency (T) Frequency -- Active units submit Regular reports monthly Reserve units submit Regular reports quarterly Army Garrison or Installations submit Regular reports quarterly Reports are submitted as of the 15th of the month PRIMARY REFERENCES AR 220-1, Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration-Consolidated Policies DA PAM 220-1, Defense Readiness Reporting System-Army Procedures NetUSR Training Support Package, Users Guides and Software Application AR 220-1, Chapters 4 and 10

NetUSR Types of Reports
SHOW SLIDE 41: NETUSR TYPES OF REPORTS NOTE: Refer students to DA PAM 220-1, table 3-1, for detailed explanation of all reports. Regular Reports: (1) Full report routinely submitted monthly by NON-DEPLOYED COMPO 1 units, by NON-DEPLOYED RC units while on active duty status, and by designated RC units when directed or following their formal alert for deployment. Other NON-DEPLOYED RC units that are not on active duty status routinely submit this report quarterly. (2) When the unit commander chooses or when directed by ADCON authorities at higher levels, deployed units (COMPO 1 and RC) can submit a Regular report. Validation Reports: Intra-quarterly report routinely submitted by designated Generating Force units, APS custodians and by USAR and ARNG units that are not mobilized or on active duty status. May be submitted by the unit only if no changes to the measured area levels, the overall readiness levels, the Y/Q/N METL assessments, or the overall Y/Q/N capability assessments have occurred since the last report. Deployed Reports: Abbreviated report meeting the minimum information and status reporting requirements that is routinely submitted monthly by a DEPLOYED unit. The levels of the measured resource areas (PSRT) and the overall levels are subjectively assessed. Composite Reports: Are roll ups of the components parts of larger organizations (such as divisions). They provide a status of major (FF Level) units, such as divisions, ACRs and separate enhanced brigades. Installation Status Report: Quarterly special report submitted by designated Army installations; measures the facility’s infrastructure readiness based on physical capitalized infrastructure measurements contained in the ISR. DUIC Special: Abbreviated special report for deployed/non-deployed ad-hoc elements or entities. Generating Forces Short Report: Modified special report submitted quarterly by non-deployable TDA (Generating force) units that have no authoritative data available IAW guidance from HQDA (DAMO-ODR). VALIDATION (Reserve Component Only) REGULAR CHANGE DEPLOYED DA PAM 220-1, Table 3-2/ AR 220-1, para 4-11d

USR Security Classification
Classification is based on number/type of reporting units and the amount/type of sensitive information. Minimum classification for MTOE units: SECRET: Major Combat Units (FF-level UIC) at the brigade-level and above SECRET: More than one battalion or five or more separate MTOE company/detachment sized units (AA-level UIC) CONFIDENTIAL: All reports not classified SECRET IAW established guidelines Retain for minimum of 2 years at the major unit/headquarters level; not less than 6 months by other reporting units (AA-level UIC) All USRs and associated data will be marked with a specific declassification date SHOW SLIDE 10: USR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION The classification requirements for CUSRs and the CUSR data in the DRRS-Army database are based on the number and type of reporting units and the amount and type of sensitive information or data in the CUSR that require protection from unauthorized disclosure. Minimum Classification of the CUSRs of MTOE units and organizations: SECRET when the CUSR is a report submitted by a MTOE organization at the brigade level and above, to include the major units and major headquarters. SECRET when more than one battalion or five or more separate MTOE company/detachment-size units (AA-level UIC) are represented or reflected in the report. CONFIDENTIAL for all reports not classified SECRET in accordance with the guidelines above. The security classification of CUSRs submitted by TDA units, organizations and installations is CONFIDENTIAL, unless a higher level of security classification has been specifically prescribed. AR 220-1, para 11-1d

Mission Capabilities Assessment
CUSR Report Levels A-LEVEL C-LEVEL 4 Tier Rating Scale Mission Capabilities Assessment P-LEVEL

Unit Status Report (CUSR)
Commanders Unit Status Report (CUSR) THE BIG AR CHANGE One report contains both the “as designed“ and “assigned mission” assessments. Commanders always report this assessment monthly. Fulfills Existing Joint Staff Requirements (supports Congressional Oversight, Chairman’s Risk Assessment, and other COCOM oriented assessments) Core Functions/Designed Capabilities = MTOE/TDA Personnel Equipment on Hand Equipment Serviceability Training (METL) C-Level How well a unit is resourced and trained, measured against the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was “as designed” A-Level How well a unit is resourced and trained measured against the “assigned mission” requirements of the unit. Feeds Joint Staff Percentage Effective (PCTEF) data requirement) Assigned Mission Manning Assigned Mission Equipping A-Level Reporting Trigger. Commanders report A-Level when one condition is met: Directed by chain of command. When the focus of training is the deployed mission environment (i.e., NLT LAD minus 270 days) Commanders report this assessment when a mission is assigned. AR 220-1, Chapter 9

Assigned Mission Levels (A-Level)
Overall assessment that reflects the unit’s ability to accomplish the assigned mission and those tasks on its METL. Contains measured resource areas that indicate the availability status of resources (personnel and equipment) measured against resource requirements for the assigned mission. The following definitions apply: A-1: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake the full assigned mission. A-2: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of the assigned mission. A-3: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all, portions of the assigned mission. A-4: Unit requires additional resources or training to undertake the assigned mission, but may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand. AR 220-1, Appendix C DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5(b)

Category Levels (C-Level)
An overall unit readiness metric established by the Joint Staff. C-levels reflect the unit‘s ability to accomplish core functions, provide designed capabilities, and execute the standardized METs. Derived from four measured areas (PSRT) that indicate the availability status of resources and unit training proficiency measured against the designed capabilities from the unit’s MTOE or TDA. C-1: Unit can undertake the missions it was designed for C-2: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of the its missions for which it is designed C-3: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission for which it is designed C-4: Unit requires additional resources or training to undertake its designed mission, but may be directed to undertake some portions of its mission with resources on hand C-5: Unit is undergoing a service directed resource action and is not prepared, at this time, to undertake the full spectrum mission for which designed. AR 220-1, Table DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5

Category Level C-5 Indicates the unit is undergoing a HQDA-directed resource action and is not prepared, at this time, to undertake the full spectrum mission for which it is designed (i.e., accomplish core functions and provide designed capabilities). Unit may be capable of undertaking nontraditional or non- standard missions. C-5 units restricted to the following: Reconstituting following deployment or are undergoing activation, inactivation, conversion, or other HQDA- directed resource action Not manned or equipped but are required in the wartime structure (that is, COMPO 4 units) Placed in cadre status by HQDA. Lifecycle Management units while in the RESET force pool Directed to report C-5 by HQDA (DAMO-ODR) DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5a(5)

The Four Tier Rating Scale
The following metrics comprise the “four tier” rating scale for unit readiness status measurements and assessments. Note that level 5 and level 6 are exceptional values reported in place of level 4 or only when special circumstances apply, respectively. 1 Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission it is currently assigned. 2 Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide most of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake most of the mission it is currently assigned. 3 Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide many, but not all, of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission it is currently assigned. 4 Unit requires additional resources or training to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission currently assigned; however, the unit may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand (available). 5 Unit is undergoing a HQDA-directed resource action and/or is part of a HQDA directed program and is not prepared to accomplish or provide the core functions or fundamental capabilities for which it was designed. Units report C-5 IAW the policy and procedures established in AR 220-1, para 4-8. Level 5 is not applicable to A-level reporting. 6 Level 6 is applicable to the measured areas only. It indicates that a measured area is not measurable, or by HQDA direction, is not measured. AR 220-1, para DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5

Mission Capability Assessments
The “three tier” rating scale (Y / Q / N) will be used by all measured units to determine and report their Mission Essential Task (MET) capability assessments. Y “Yes” - The organization can accomplish the task to standard under the specified conditions. A “Yes” assessment should reflect demonstrated performance in training or operations whenever possible. Q “Qualified Yes” - The organization is expected to accomplish the task to standard, but this performance has not been observed or demonstrated in training or operations. Organizations assessing their task capability as a “Qualified Yes” may be employed for those tasks. N “No” - The organization is unable to accomplish the MET to standard at this time. T/P/U (ADRP 7-0) measures unit’s training proficiency for its METL tasks. Y/Q/N capability assessment is intended to reflect a unit’s actual potential to perform the task. AR 220-1, para DA PAM 220-1, para ADRP 7-0, para 3-71

KEY TERMS Assigned Strength Authorized Strength Required Strength
Available Strength

Personnel Metrics and Data
Metrics: Readiness status measurements or assessments accomplished IAW the criteria established by AR Data Points: Measurements, assessments, or facts that do not directly support the resource measurement; however, provide specific info for management oversight or trend analysis. Critical personnel metrics include: Required Strength Assigned Strength Percentage Available Strength Percentage Assigned MOS Skills Match Available Senior-Grade Composite Level Determine P-Level Used to Metrics for Determining P-Level Available Senior Grade Level Available Strength Assigned MOS Skills Match By Category Composite 1 100% - 90% 100% - 85% % 1.54 or less 2 89% - 80% 84% - 75% % 3 79% - 70% 74% - 65% % 4 69% or less 64% or less 3.35 or more AR 220-1, Chapter 9

Determining the P-Level
Step 1: Assigned Strength is entered into CUSR, does not factor into P-rating Step 2: Calculations must be performed for all three personnel categories below. Each is entered into CUSR Personnel Category ASSIGNED STRENGTH A) AVAIL STRENGTH B) Assigned MOS Skills Match % C) AVAIL SR GRADE Personnel Status Calculations (Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100 (Available Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100 (Assigned MOS Skills Match%) x 100 (Available Sr Grade Strength ÷ Required Senior-Grade) Strength x 100 Step 3: Unit P-Level is based on the lowest (worst case) personnel status percentage calculation. (e.g., If a unit is P1 for available, strength and MOSQ strength, but is P3 for available senior grade strength, then the unit is P3) P Level Available Strength % Assigned MOS Skills Match % Available Sr Grade Strength % P1 100-90% 100-85% P2 89-80% 84-75% P3 79-70% 74-65% P4 69% or less 64% or less Unit is P3 Notes: #1: AVAIL STR percentage has a higher standard then AVAIL MOSQ and AVAIL Sr Grade. #2: AVAIL Sr Grade is lowest level determined for the applicable Sr Grade categories.

Available MOSQ Available MOSQ Strength by duty position = Soldiers assigned and attached who are currently available and possess the training and skills necessary to perform effectively in the duty position currently slotted (AR 220-1, para 9-2e). Includes: Soldiers who possess the required MOS (includes additional or secondary MOS) required by TOE/TDA Soldiers who hold MOS formally designated or directed for substitution by HQDA Enlisted Soldiers serving in duty positions up to two grades higher or one grade lower than current grade Officers and Warrant Officers serving one grade higher and one grade lower than current grade Do not count SQI or LIC except for AMEDD personnel and authorized linguist positions Assigned MOS Skills Match = Avail Asgn/Atch MOSQ ÷ Required Strength X 100 P-level AMOSQ % % % 64% or less NOTE: Commanders will indicate in their remarks any subjective assessments of MOS qualification that are in variance with HQDA requirements and will consider subjective assessments of MOSQ by duty position when determining overall C-level. AR 220-1, para 9-2e(2)

Available Senior Grade
Available Senior-grade composite level = Aggregation of the discrete levels for each of the five categories of senior-grade personnel: Junior NCO (E5 - E6) Junior Officer (O1 - O3) Senior NCO (E7 - E9) Senior Officer (O4 - O6) Warrant Officer (W1 - W5) Available SG% = Available SG ÷ Senior Grade Requirements Available Senior Grade Level By Category Composite 1 % 1.54 or less 2 % 3 % 4 64% or less 3.35 or more Composite Example Jr NCO 87% P-1 Sr NCO 72% P-3 WO 94% Jr Off 65% Sr Off 97% (9) 9 ÷ 5 = 1.8 P-2

Additional Personnel Data Points
Personnel turnover percentage Assigned MOSQ strength by duty position MOS shortage report Assigned Senior-grade strength SQI, SSI, and language qualifications Soldiers Available-Not Deploying Professional Military Education (PME) achievement milestones AR 220-1, para 9-2(h)

ENABLING SYSTEMS

Defense Readiness Reporting System-Army (DRRS-A)
DoD’s single readiness reporting system User interface for DRRS-A is NetUSR Secure, web-based information system Resource information provided via authoritative databases and not via input from individual units Units use the NetUSR tool to determine and communicate their status and mission capabilities

NetUSR PERSONNEL TAB Strength - review and validate data from authoritative databases used to calculate P-Rating Roll-Up By Grade - summary of personnel by grade Shortage Ranking - relative ranking of MOS / position shortfalls Non-Available Reasons - allows user to provide a reason code Interactive multimedia training that explains the full functionality of NetUSR is available online: 29

PAVR - eMILPO Links to: PSBG: Personnel Strength By Grade Report
ASGN PER: # and % of Assigned Personnel AVAL PER: # and % of Available Personnel MOSQ: # and % of MOS Qualified # of Senior Qualified SGPER: # and % of Senior Grade Personnel Available TOPER: # and % of Turnover Personnel List of Available Soldiers List of Non-Available Soldiers List of Soldiers MOS Qualified List of Soldiers Not MOS-Qualified PAVR INFO: List of those Soldiers the commander granted waiver for Non-Available and MOS-Qualified FEMASGD: # of female Soldiers assigned FEM PCT: Percentage of females in the unit FEMPREG: # of Female Soldiers who are Pregnant PCTPREG: Percentage of female Soldiers who are pregnant PROFREQ: # of Professional Fillers required PROAVAL: # of Professional Fillers Available PROFPCT: Professional Filler Percentage Links to: PSBG: Personnel Strength By Grade Report MOSSR: Military Occupational Specialty Shortage Report ASI/SQISR: Additional Skill Identifier/Skill Qualification Identifier Shortage Report LSSR: Language Skill Shortage Report Non-Avail: Non-Available Report UIC Selection: Change UIC

Equipment and Supplies
S-1 Takeaways Personnel Equipment Readiness Equipment and Supplies Training USR S-1s / HR professionals play a significant role in force readiness and unit status reporting. Use the “system of record” (eMILPO/ SIDPERS) and make data accuracy a priority. Be credible in reporting. Manage readiness at your level as you would expect it to be managed by higher headquarters. Become the “subject matter expert” in strength management and personnel readiness in your organization. Make higher HQ your allies. The professional knowledge of leaders is essential to sound teaching and to improve the proficiency as well as the readiness of units. GEN John Wickham, Jr. Chief of Staff, Army

Back up Slides

Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Interpret Unit Status Reporting Data"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback