Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Implementation of infrared tool at key steps

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Implementation of infrared tool at key steps"— Presentation transcript:

1 Implementation of infrared tool at key steps
along the process may improve the quality management of tomato based products Sylvie Bureau1, Alexandre Vilas-Boas1, Robert Giovinazzo2, David Page1 1 INRA - Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, UMR SQPOV, Avignon, France 2 SONITO, Maison de l’Agriculture, Avignon, France 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece

2 MIRS at different steps along the process
What we know: The tomato industry lacks of tools to: Better characterize the technological potential of raw material, Monitor processes, Discriminate characteristics of industrial products. What we want to do with MIRS: 1- Predict quality parameters of raw material Define the best strategy to build models useful for industry 2- Track products along the processing chain Discriminate the fresh products and their corresponding HB and CB purées 3- Control the final products Determine the characteristics of purées and pastes regarding the specification books Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 2 2

3 Why mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIRS)?
● Absorption by samples ● Relationship between spectra and composition ● MIR: a region of the electromagnetic spectrum ( cm-1) ● Link between the fundamental bands and chemical structures ● Easy and rapid acquisition of spectral data In Laboratory In Industry TRIPLE BONDS DOUBLE FINGERPRINT REGION SKELETAL VIBRATION X-H HETEROATOMS 1000 2000 2500 3000 3500 1500 FINGERPRINT REGION C-H stretching O-H C=O C-C C-O C-N C=C C=N bending Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece

4 MIRS at different steps along the process
1- Predict quality parameters of raw material Define the best strategy to build models useful for industry 2- Track products along the processing chain Discriminate the fresh products and their corresponding HB and CB purées 3- Control the final products Determine the characteristics of purées and pastes regarding the specification books Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 4 4

5 1- MIRS to predict quality parameters of raw material
Methods - Raw tomatoes studied over 2 years: - Analyses: Year 1: 102 samples Varieties: 29 Locations: 6 (SE and SW France) Harvesting dates : 7 (July-September) Maturity stages: 3 (turning, ripe, over ripe) Year 2: 144 samples Varieties: 39 Locations: 9 (SE and SW France) Harvesting dates: 13 (July-September) Maturity stages: 2 (ripe and over ripe) Spectrum acquisition Homogenization Classical measurements Parameters: - Soluble solids (SSC) - Titratable acidity (TA) - Dry matter (DMC) 15 tomatoes Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 5 5 13th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, Sirmione, Italy, 8-11 June 2014

6 Need a strategy to build relevant models
Variability of fruit quality according to the year Spectral data Biochemical data Year 1 Year 2 Need a strategy to build relevant models Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece

7 Methodology used to predict quality parameters
I. Model development MIRS Spectrum acquisition Reference data using classical techniques . 1 Linear regression (PLS) Equation of calibration Dry matter Soluble solids Titratable acidity Cross-validation II. Prediction of unknown samples . 1 Sample DMC SSC TA % °Brix meq/100g 16FRADVChaxx2207CADE1 7.4 5.0 6.2 16FRCARChaxx2207CADE1 7.0 4.7 5.4 17FRGONChaxx2207CADE1 7.6 5.1 7.5 17FRH81Chaxx2207CADE1 8.2 5.2 6.4 Equation of calibration External validation Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece

8 Evaluation of model performance
the best model - Determination coefficient: R2 - Root mean square error: RMSE - Residual predictive deviation: RPD RPD > 2.5: good model Relationship between measured and predicted values: Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 8 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece

9 Comparison of different strategies to build models
M1+2early Year 1 Year 2 P2 P1 P2 late Cross-validation External validation Model Prediction Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece

10 Model performance: Cross-validation
M1+2early Year 1 Year 2 Models Quality trait RPD R cv 2 RMSE SSC (°Brix) 0.95 0.16 4.3 0.94 0.13 3.6 0.14 4.5 DMC (%) 0.87 0.25 2.6 0.85 0.41 0.34 3.9 TA (mmolH + /kg) 0.84 2.19 2.5 0.96 2.23 4.6 0.79 4.15 2.2 Cross-validation Model performance ↑ R2 ↑ and RMSECV ↓ RPD > 2.5: good prediction The multi-year model is as good as the single-year models Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 10 10

11 Model performance: External validation
M1+2early Models Year 1 Year 2 Predictions P2 P1 P2 late Quality trait Models Prediction R v 2 RMSE SSC (°Brix) M1 P2 0.31 0.90 M2 P1 0.88 0.25 M1+2early P2late 0.95 0.11 DMC (%) 0.13 3.89 0.79 2.54 0.81 0.36 TA (mmolH + /kg) 0.27 33.12 0.16 53.44 2.81 External validation Year 1 Year 2 The multi-year model is more robust than the single-year models Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 11 11

12 1- MIRS to predict quality parameters of raw material
Significant result The multi-year strategy improves the model robustness. The strategy is adapted to the need of industry: the early tomatoes participate to the model calibration each year 2 M1 M1+2 3 M1+2+3 M 4 Years 5 Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 12 12 13th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, Sirmione, Italy, 8-11 June 2014

13 MIRS at different steps along the process
1- Predict quality parameters of raw material Define the best strategy to build models useful for industry 2- Track products along the processing chain Discriminate the fresh products and their corresponding HB and CB purées 3- Control the final products Determine the characteristics of purées and pastes regarding the specification books Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 13 13

14 2- Track products along the processing chain
Methods 1 - Raw material (2 years, 4 varieties, 2 stresses, 3 dates, 2 blocs) = 144 batches 2 - Two cooking methods = 288 purées 3 - MIR spectral data acquisition 4 - Multivariate analysis PCA: Principal component analysis FDA: Factorial discriminant analysis Grinding (30 sec) Maceration (30 min, at room T°) Microwave heating (900 W, 0,35sec/g of tomato) Cold break Cooling (in ice, until room T°) Hot break (blender, 30 sec) Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 14 14

15 Methodology to discriminate samples
1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 F value Factor effect Informative region Spectral data (SNV, smoothing) 1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Wavenumber (cm-1) 1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Selection ANOVA Factorial Discriminant Analysis FDA Principal Component Analysis PCA Ability to classify samples according to the known groups (processing, variety…) Representation of samples in a 2D plot according to the selected spectral data Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 15 15

16 Cartography according to selected spectral regions
Processing Variety cm-1 cm-1 HB CB H10 H13 MIC TER FDA Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 16 16

17 Other results… Agricultural practices Processing
MIRS makes possible the discrimination of tomato products according to different factors (varieties, maturity, processing…) Agricultural practices -0.12 -0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 -0.15 -0.05 0.05 0.1 0.15 F1 F2 FR CB HB Fresh Cooking Process routes Field Greenhouse July, 29 July, 28 July, 22 August, 06 August, 04 July, 20 Processing Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 17 17

18 MIRS at different steps along the process
1- Predict quality parameters of raw material Define the best strategy to build models useful for industry 2- Track products along the processing chain Discriminate the fresh products and their corresponding HB and CB purées 3- Control the final products Determine the characteristics of purées and pastes regarding the specification books Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 18 18

19 3. MIRS to control the Industry products
Experiment: 140 products from 2 plants (juices, purées and pastes) MIRS in our Lab and reference data from the plant Control Laboratory SSC (°Brix) Viscosity (Bostwick) R2 = 0.98 RMSECV = 0.97 juices A significant relationship with SSC and viscosity MIRS makes possible the characterization of the final products Sylvie BUREAU / Rapid characterization of processed tomato purees using mid-infrared spectroscopy 19 19 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece

20 Summary: Implementation of MIRS tool in Industry
Quality check of the incoming tomatoes to optimize their use Routinely prediction of SSC, TA and DMC 1 Following the processing route Monitor the cooking conditions (HB/CB, concentration) 2 3 Traceability and control of the final products (purees, sauces, pastes…) Determination of their characteristics regarding the specification books Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 20 20

21 Conclusions & Perspectives
Strategy to build models: Proof of concept at the Lab scale: Accumulation of data over years Industrial validation with adapted tools: Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 21 21

22 Thank you for your attention
Sylvie BUREAU / Implementation of infrared tool along the process may improve the quality management 15th ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, June 11th - 15th, 2018, Greece 22 22


Download ppt "Implementation of infrared tool at key steps"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google