Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Stepping up the 50/50–lessons from SADC, Zimbabwe case study

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Stepping up the 50/50–lessons from SADC, Zimbabwe case study"— Presentation transcript:

1 Stepping up the 50/50–lessons from SADC, Zimbabwe case study

2 Structure of presentation
Why do we need women in politics? Why do we have such variation in performance in SADC? How can we learn from each other – we have all the answers! Case study – SADC Gender and Elections Mission to Zimbabwe How can this be applied? Some opportunities

3 Thenjiwe Mtintso’s framework
ACCESS TRANSFORMATION PARTICIPATION Personal Internal Services

4 Women in politics SADC 2019

5 What is keeping women out of politics? Can’t be what you can’t see
FORMAL FACTORS INFORMAL FACTORS Electoral systems Socialisation, attitudes Quotas Custom, culture, tradition Finances and resources Old boys network The media Others?

6 SADC – the simple facts Electoral system Overall % Women
With quota % women Without quota % W FPTP 13% 15% PR 38% 36% MIXED 34% 37% 23% OVERALL 26% 16% Electoral systems matter Special (Temporary) Measures are crucial

7 Zimbabwe – three elections
Quota – expiring 2023 No quota

8 SADC Elections Mission

9 Electoral system – FPTP (winner takes all)
00000 000 00 0000

10 Electoral system – PR or list
Party A= 10% Party B = 30% Party C = 20% Party D = 40% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 Mixed system – PR and FPTP
PARTY A PARTY B PARTY C PARTY D 1 2 3 00000 000 00 0000

12 Pros and cons – no perfect system!
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES GENDER CONSIDERATIONS FPTP Good for accountability Winner takes all is not good for inclusion Women especially excluded – lack funds and networks PR Good for inclusion Weak on accountability – vote for a party, not a candidate When combined with voluntary or legislated quota results in rapid increase in women’s participation Mixed Includes the best of both worlds PR candidates are regarded as token If the PR candidates happen to be women (e.g national level in Zimbabwe) this adds to the notion of tokenism

13 Options – FPTP QUOTA EXAMPLE PROS CONS Voluntary Party
Zambia, Botswana, Zimbabwe Accountability, party ownership Slow results for women Reserved candidates Mauritius (Gender neutral) Wide acceptance Only delivers results if there is corresponding advocacy Reserved seats Lesotho local (2005) Guarantees the quota; women can compete in general May be seen as discriminatory against men

14 Options – Mixed QUOTA EXAMPLE PROS CONS PR women only
Zimbabwe national, Tanzania, Lesotho local Guarantees the quota; does not infringe the rights of male candidates Women who come in on PR may be seen as “token” Quota for women in PR seats Lesotho national Ensures maximum advantage for women in PR seats Does not deliver good overall results, if FPTP is 50% or more Voluntary South Africa local Party ownership and buy-in Women do better in PR than FPTP seats although this is improving

15 SA Mixed System at local
Year % Women Ward (FPTP) % Women PR % Women overall 1995 11% 28% 19% 2000 17% 38% 29% 2006 37% 42% 40% 2011 33% 43% 2016 48% 41%

16 PR Options QUOTA EXAMPLE PROS CONS Legislated Namibia local
Delivers excellent results Zimbabwe may not change its entire system in the time available. In Namibia some feel that PR is not best system at the local level due to the need for accountability. Voluntary Namibia national SA National Party ownership of the zebra system Women’s representation is at the w him of parties – Motion for legislated Quota

17 Observations FPTP with no quotas has not worked (see results at local)
Mixed system with PR seats for women only (current quota at national) not necessarily the best = guard against more of the same and extending this to local. Total shift to PR is unlikely Better to avoid reserved seats

18 Recommendations National Go for mixed system (already have one!)
50% candidate quota for PR and FPTP seats Guaranteed results in PR, improved results FPTP Local Mixed system may not work 50% candidate quota Concerted advocacy campaign with political parties, general public Recom study visit to Mauritius ZEC – to monitor for adherence

19 Group work FPTP PR Mixed Botswana Angola Lesotho Malawi Mozambique
Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe Namibia Mauritius South Africa Seychelles Madagascar Eswatini

20 COUNTRY 50/50 Strategy

21 Facts Local Gvt Upper House Lower House Electoral system
Quota – Constitutional, legislated, voluntary Last election % women Next election

22 Strategy – local government

23 Strategy – national

24 Lessons from SADC countries

25 Partners/funders

26 Way forward Gender audits of upcoming elections – evidence
Evidence should inform strategy Study visits Position papers Start early!! Use the Alliance network? UN Women audit of laws in East and Southern Africa – Moz, Zambia, Zim


Download ppt "Stepping up the 50/50–lessons from SADC, Zimbabwe case study"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google