Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparing Aortic Root Replacements: Porcine Bioroots Versus Pericardial Versus Mechanical Composite Roots: Hemodynamic and Ventricular Remodeling at Greater.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparing Aortic Root Replacements: Porcine Bioroots Versus Pericardial Versus Mechanical Composite Roots: Hemodynamic and Ventricular Remodeling at Greater."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparing Aortic Root Replacements: Porcine Bioroots Versus Pericardial Versus Mechanical Composite Roots: Hemodynamic and Ventricular Remodeling at Greater Than One-Year Follow-Up  Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, Joseph E. Bavaria, MD, Alberto Pochettino, MD, Zachary Fox, BA, Patrick Moeller, BS, Wilson Y. Szeto, MD, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012) DOI: /j.athoracsur Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Implanted valve size.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3 Fig 2 Aortic valve (AV) mean gradient.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4 Fig 3 Left ventricular end diastolic diameter.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Comparing Aortic Root Replacements: Porcine Bioroots Versus Pericardial Versus Mechanical Composite Roots: Hemodynamic and Ventricular Remodeling at Greater."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google