Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities"— Presentation transcript:

1 Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities
9/12/2019 3:53 AM VIR312 Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Matt McSpirit | MCSE | MCITP | VCP Senior Product Marketing Manager Microsoft Corporation @mattmcspirit © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

2 Compete to Win | The Series
I - Core Virtualization II - Private Cloud On Demand Private Cloud Choices Private Cloud Comparisons

3 Private Cloud Attributes
Pooled Resources Self-Service Elastic Usage Based Plus with Private Cloud… Control Customizable It’s cloud, dedicated to you

4 Product View Self-Service vCloud Director App Controller Service Mgmt.
VMware Service Manager Service Manager Protection Data Recovery 2.0 Data Protection Manager Automation vCenter Orchestrator Orchestrator Monitoring vCenter Ops Mgmt. Suite vFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric Hyperic Operations Manager VM Management vCenter vFabric Application Director Virtual Machine Manager Hypervisor vSphere Hypervisor Hyper-V

5 Licensing View Self-Service vCloud Director App Controller
System Center 2012 Service Mgmt. VMware Service Manager Service Manager Protection Data Recovery 2.0 Data Protection Manager Automation vCenter Orchestrator Orchestrator Monitoring vCenter Ops Mgmt. Suite vFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric Hyperic Operations Manager VM Management vCenter vFabric Application Director Virtual Machine Manager Hypervisor vSphere Hypervisor Hyper-V

6 Comparison Focus All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up
Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

7 Comparison Focus All about the App 9/12/2019 3:53 AM
© 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

8 All about the App Constructing, Delivering & Consuming Apps
Maintaining, Managing & Monitoring Apps Protection of Key Applications & Workloads

9 Agile Service Delivery
9/12/2019 3:53 AM demo Agile Service Delivery © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

10 All about the App Construction, Delivery & Consumption Standardized
VM Templates Roles & Features Application Layers VM Templates 2.0: Service Templates Deployment into clouds Role-based Self Service Controlled Consumption

11 Microsoft | VMware Comparison
Application Construction, Delivery & Consumption Capability Microsoft VMware Request Private Cloud Resources Yes Unproven1 Role-Based Self-Service Yes2 Standardized Templates Yes3 Template Granularity: Roles / Features No Template Granularity: Application Layer Yes4 Service/Multi-Tier Templates Deployment Across Heterogeneous Clouds VMware vCloud Request Manager has been deprecated with customers recommended to upgrade to VMware Service Manager Requires vCloud Director, available at additional cost Each VMware VM template will have it’s own VMDK, even if the template varies only slightly in it’s configuration options. Whilst VMware offer no alternative to Server App-V, vFabric Application Director would allow more granular control over the application layer for certain apps, and provide the ability to deploy multi-tiered services VMware Information:

12 Reducing Time to Resolution
9/12/2019 3:53 AM demo Reducing Time to Resolution © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

13 All about the App Maintenance, Management & Monitoring
Centralized Maintenance Extends beyond the private cloud Integrated Service Management Powerful, relevant automation Deep application insight Connecting Dev-Ops

14 Microsoft | VMware Comparison
Application Maintenance, Management & Monitoring Capability Microsoft VMware Centralized Patching & Maintenance Yes Yes1 Non-Virtualized Infrastructure Management Yes2 Integrated Service Management Unproven3 Heterogeneous Automation VMware Centric4 Deep Application Insight Multiple Tools5 Integrated Dev-Ops No6 VMware, with Update Manager, can patch ESXi Hosts, and with the vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus, can manage physical hosts, and guest OS’s from a patching perspective. Customers would require VMware Hyperic to perform any kind of monitoring of the physical infrastructure. Both of these additional products are licensed per VM and come at considerable expense. Would require vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus and VMware Hyperic to manage any physical systems. vCloud Request Manager deprecated with customers encouraged to upgrade to the unproven VMware Service Manager, with no guarantees of integration with other vCenter Management Components. VMware's vCenter Orchestrator has a limited set of plug-ins, of which the vast majority are VMware centric. No mention of plug-ins for other enterprise management systems and tools such as those from HP, IBM, BMC etc. VMware require multiple tools to deliver any form of insight. vCenter Operations will monitor hosts, vFabric Hyperic will monitor applications on physical servers, but simply collects metrics, without providing guidance for remediation. vFabric APM required for insight into a limited number of applications Lab Manager deprecated, with customers expected to upgrade to vCloud Director, which has no connections with Development IDE. VMware Information: ,

15 All about the App Protection of Key Applications & Workloads
Granular Workload Protection Physical or Virtual Generic Data Source Protection Centralized, Role-Based Management Backup to Tape Low-Cost Disaster Recovery

16 Microsoft | VMware Comparison
Protection of Key Applications & Workloads Capability Microsoft VMware Granular Workload Protection Yes No1 Physical & Virtual Protection 3rd Party Integration No2 Centralized Role-Based Management No3 Tape Backup No4 Low Cost Disaster Recovery No5 VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection for the workloads within the virtual machine, simply focusing on the VM itself as the protection unit and offers no protection of physical machines VMware Data Recovery 2.0 is not extensible by 3rd parties VMware Data Recovery 2.0 appliances are unaware of one another, leading to potentially duplicated backups, or missed backups. VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection to tape media. Disk only VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager provides a solution for disaster recovery, it comes at significant additional cost, which rises for each VM that is protected. VMware Information:

17 Cross Platform from the metal up
9/12/2019 3:53 AM Comparison Focus Cross Platform from the metal up © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

18 Cross Platform from the Metal Up
Application Frameworks Management OS Hypervisor Fabric

19 Heterogeneous Management
9/12/2019 3:53 AM demo Heterogeneous Management © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

20 Microsoft | VMware Comparison
Cross-Platform Infrastructure Management Capability Microsoft VMware Multi-Hypervisor Management Yes No1 Comprehensive Guest OS Support Yes2 3rd Party Management Integration Limited3 Multiple Application Frameworks Spring4 VMware vCenter manages VMware ESX and ESXi only. Would require additional 3rd party technologies to manage alternative hypervisors. VMware do not produce any operating systems, and support is therefore focused not on the guest operating system itself, but instead, on the VM Tools and hardware. A number of enterprise management tools integrate with vCenter, however VMware’s management tools, and orchestration tools lack broad interoperability with other systems. vFabric is a platform focused 100% on Spring, Java, and is available at considerable expense, on a per VM basis. Development tools are disconnected from other management tools, and only vFabric APM can provide insight into the applications, available at additional expense. VMware Information:

21 Foundation for the Future
9/12/2019 3:53 AM Comparison Focus Foundation for the Future © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

22 Hyper-V Server 2012 Free Standalone Download Contains Small Footprint
Hypervisor Windows Server Driver Model Key Virtualization Components Small Footprint Minimal Overhead Integrates into current infrastructure Feature rich 

23 Foundation for the Future
Scalability, Performance & Density Security & Multitenancy Flexible Infrastructure High Availability & Resiliency Host: 320 LP | 4TB Host: 1024 VMs VM: 64 vCPU | 1TB VM: 64TB VHDX Cluster: 64 | 4000 Virtual Fiber Channel 4K Disk Support ODX QoS Extensible Switch: PVLANS ARP/ND Spoofing DHCP Guard Monitoring Mirroring DVMQ | SR-IOV IPsec Task Offload BitLocker Live Migration Storage Migration Shared-Nothing LM Network Virtualization Incremental Backup Hyper-V Replica NIC Teaming Cluster: 64 | 4000 Secure Clustered Storage Enhanced CSV 3 Level Availability Priority & Affinity Hyper-V: A More Complete Virtualization Platform

24 Comparison Focus Cloud on your terms 9/12/2019 3:53 AM
© 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

25 Cloud on your terms Microsoft Public Cloud Microsoft Private Cloud Microsoft Private Cloud System Center 2012 IDENTITY | MANAGEMENT | VIRTUALIZATION | DEVELOPMENT

26 Cloud on their terms vCloud vCloud vCloud Connector

27 Comparison Focus Costs of the Cloud

28 500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud
15:1 VM to Host Ratio 34 Hosts 2 CPU w/ 16 Cores Windows Server licensing additional Comprehensive Management 68 CPUs of Windows Server Datacenter

29 500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud |
68 CPUs Hyper-V Server $0 68 CPUs System Center 2012 $122,638* Total Cost $122,638 Provides complete infrastructure management including: Application Performance Management, Self-Service, Backup & Application Protection, IT Service Management & Service Catalog, Orchestration and much more… * System Center Pricing:

30 500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud |
68 CPUs vSphere ENT+ $237,6601 vCenter $4,9951 vCOPS ENT $97,5002 vFabric APM $180,0003 vFabric AD $125,0004 vCloud Director $75,0005 Costs, without S&S in excess of $720,155 yet lacks service management, workload protection, in-guest management, and costs grow with density due to per-VM licensing vSphere Enterprise Plus CPU & vCenter Pricing (Excluding S&S): vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise pricing (Excluding S&S): vFabric Application Performance Manager Pricing (Excluding S&S): vFabric Application Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): vCloud Director Pricing (Excluding S&S):

31 Summary Closing Thoughts 9/12/2019 3:53 AM
© 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

32 Comparison Focus All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up
Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

33 Related Content Breakout Sessions:
VIR312 - Compete to Win, Part 1: Core Hypervisors (Online) MGT305 - Application Management in Private and Public Clouds (Online) MGT320 - Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2012: Zero to Cluster to Cloud (Online) MGT330 - Private Cloud Service Delivery and Automation with Microsoft System Center 2012 (Online) Hands-on Labs: MGT71-HOL, MGT41-HOL, MGT42-HOL, MGT53-HOL, MGT54-HOL Demos: MGT01-TLC (App), MGT04-TLC (Infra), MGT05-TLC (Services) Find Me At…the Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Stand

34 SIA, WSV, and VIR Track Resources
#TEVIR312 Talk to our Experts at the TLC Hands-On Labs DOWNLOAD Windows Server 2012 Release Candidate microsoft.com/windowsserver DOWNLOAD Microsoft System Center 2012 Evaluation microsoft.com/systemcenter

35 Resources Learning TechNet http://europe.msteched.com
Connect. Share. Discuss. Microsoft Certification & Training Resources TechNet Resources for IT Professionals Resources for Developers

36 Submit your evals online
9/12/2019 3:53 AM Evaluations Submit your evals online © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

37 9/12/2019 3:53 AM © 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION. © 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

38 9/12/2019 3:53 AM © 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.


Download ppt "Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google