Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

TRANSPORT TRENDS/FUNDING IN SA

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "TRANSPORT TRENDS/FUNDING IN SA"— Presentation transcript:

1 TRANSPORT TRENDS/FUNDING IN SA
July 2019 Hein Stander Pr Eng Johan Brink Pr Eng ITS

2 QUESTIONS 2016 Paper - illustrating transport trends Any major changes? Criticism on little research – effort to contribute to debate/understanding of situation Further question – financing public transport? Balance between investment on private vs public transport correct?

3 CONTENTS SA Demographics and Transport - population - economy
- registered vehicles - vehicle sales - driver licenses - fuel taxation - fuel consumption SA Social Services Spending Public Transport Transfers FFC Investigation BRT Cape Town Example Tygerberg, Cape Town Conclusions

4

5 SA POPULATION 2018 – approx 58m people Growth 2008 to % p.a. – now ±1m/year Trend continue – 69m by 2030

6 SA – GDP GROWTH Declining since 2011 (3.3%) – 2018 (1.1%) – ave since % Considering pop growth - on ave everyone getting poorer Affording improved transport infrastructure more difficult than before

7 NUMBER REGISTERED VEHICLES
Growth – 3% pa on ave – 2017 only 2% Higher than growth in population and GDP

8 NEW VEHICLE SALES NAAMSA (LOCAL + EXPORT)
SA sales show decline 2013 to 2016 Positive growth 2017 and 2018 Industry vision ±1 mil local + export by 2020 ( k+)

9 VEHICLE OWNERSHIP SA veh/1000 population Compare developed countries: to 800 Conclude: - Vehicle ownership potential to grow substantially - Pressure for road space, congestion - Car industry ±7% of GDP – work opportunities, exports, economic well being

10 DRIVER LICENSES Growth – 4.4% pa – higher than growth in vehicle numbers Confirms high rate of motorisation Impact MAAS (eg Uber) – difficult to predict Persons with licences ± = number of reg vehicles

11 FUEL TAXATION Fuel levy past decade > 250%, RAF >315% Productivity is reducing, revenue retained strong growth real terms Distance based tax – expected problematic in view of e-tolling – collection expensive

12 FUEL CONSUMPTION 2007 – 2018 Petrol cons declined 0.6% pa
Same period diesel cons grew 1.8% pa Total cons 2018 – 7% higher than 2007 Ave fuel price increase past 12 years ±7.3% p.a. In view of electric car growth - remain at this level for next 5 years?

13 SA SOCIAL SPENDING SA most unequal country in world – Gini 0.63 (2015)
% of R1.67 trillion budget for social services – social grants/education 60% of this Transfers for pt – 4% of this – R38.6 billion Social spending 20% of GDP

14 INTERGOV PUBLIC TPT TRANSFERS (FFC, 2016/17)
60% to PRASA SANRAL/Prov Maintenance grants included here? PT Operating and Network Grants included Gautrain R1.6 billion excluded? SAA could also be listed Order of magnitude believed correct

15 FINANCIAL & FISCAL COMMISSION
FFC – advise parliament on financial matters related to gov – identified need for appropriate funding model PT – investigation 2017 Resultant Div of Rev Submission (2018/19) concluded: - Funding gap urban mun’s – additional taxation can assist – national transfers still required - Settlement patterns need reversal to address cost challenges - Current Implementation PT Strategy unaffordable, instead reduce PT costs, implement incrementally Recommendations: - DOT review PTNG, shift to local revenue, ring fence local sources for pt (eg portion fuel levy generated in city) - DOT approve/pilot consolidation pt functions - defined NLTA - DOT should support IPTN’s that are financially sustainable

16 PRIVATE TRANSPORT Balance between spending on modes required
Fuel levy general revenue (not dedicated to anything) – even so, tax revenue exceed spending on roads – important source – 19/20 R80b, new carbon tax R2b, RAF R45b, licences R10b, etc Why some argues that private road users need to pay for pt not clear – not considered for hospitals, schools, etc Vehicle manufacturing very important for economy – 30% of manufacturing output, 7% of GDP Balance between spending on modes required

17 CITY OF CAPE TOWN BRT 2032 Transport Forum March 18 (Fortune/Moore) – Business Plan 47% Recovery of operating cost Subsidisation thru: Nat grants, 6% portion property tax, parking and other revenue Cities requested to earmark 4% own revenue for IPTN’s

18 EXAMPLE TYGERBERG AREA CT
250 ha north of N1 in Bellville, surrounded medium to high income residential (incl regional shopping centre, offices) Business land use growth: - past 20 years – ±300k to ±600k GLA - next 40 years – to ±1500k GLA (eventual ave bulk 0.6) With planned BRT (3 trunks + feeders) and road upgrades - Same levels of service - 10% Shift from private to public transport is predicted - Development contributions approx cover road upgrade cost - Future pt subsidies substantial (based on current practice)

19

20 PRESENT WORTH COST – 40 YEARS

21 CONCLUSIONS SA unique financial situation – not comparable with developed first world Population growing faster than economy – on average everyone getting poorer – improving tpt infrastructure more difficult Growth in registered vehicles and driver licenses point to increasing motorisation Vehicle ownership (211/1000 pop) low relative to developed world (500 to 800) Fuel taxation – even though productivity is reducing – grown in real terms – replacement by distance based tax considered problematic (e-tolls experience) – need thorough investigation Fuel consumption – petrol usage declining, diesel growing – in total no indication yet of turning point SA social spending – 60% of budget – 2018/19 R1trillion - pt low at 4% of total

22 CONCLUSIONS CONTINUED
8. PRASA receives 60% of pt transfers – network and operational grants also substantial – Gautrain and SAA tend not to be mentioned FFC investigation – shift to increased local funding of pt, consolidation of pt functions, IPTN’s sustainable Argument that private road users should pay for pt, questioned – search for balance between usage of modes Projection Cape Town BRT – subsidise thru nat grants and inter alia 6% of property tax – in line with FFC recommendation Investigation Tygerberg – consequences planned pt network – serious financial implications SA AT CORRECT INVESTMENT BALANCE BETWEEN PRIVATE/PUBLIC TPT? Status quo is being afforded – changes can have major financial consequences – should be understood/considered

23 FINALLY, SO WHAT OPTIONS MOVING FORWARD?
Tax differently? – fuel taxation grows, productivity down, EV’s medium term impact, investigate options Tax more? – SA 8th highest tax/GDP (2017/18 – 26%) – Min Finance “ceiling” Distribute revenue differently? – suggested, happening eg CT Other side coin – operate more efficiently/honestly

24 Thank you


Download ppt "TRANSPORT TRENDS/FUNDING IN SA"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google