Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Katsuji Koyama Kyoto University X-ray or Electron irradiation ?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Katsuji Koyama Kyoto University X-ray or Electron irradiation ?"— Presentation transcript:

1 Spatial Distribution of the Galactic Diffuse X-Rays and Time Variability of the 6.4-keV Clumps
Katsuji Koyama Kyoto University X-ray or Electron irradiation ? (1) Diffuse ? or Integrated point sources ? GC 2.5 keV (He-like S) 6.7 keV (He-like Fe) 6.4 keV (Neutral Fe)

2 l-distribution b-distribution Point source Flux (4.8-8 keV)
The 6.7 keV line flux vs Integrated point source flux (Chandra deep exposure) Near GC ( |I| < 0.3 deg) l-distribution b-distribution Sgr A* 10 x 6.7 keV line (EW=0.5 keV) Point source Flux (4.8-8 keV) ( b)

3 The 6.7 and 6.96 keV lines in GC and GR 6.7 keV line : Point-sources:
Exponential FWHM ~ 0.2 deg 6.7keV lines Point-sources: power-law index = 0.9 (Infrared star numbers, Chandra point sources) 6.96/6.7 keV Temperature F6.96/F6.7 ~ (GC) ~ (GR)

4 Gamma is constant (~1.9) (independent of F6.4/F6.7)
Made 2 x 16 spectra and fit with a model of Power-law + Gaussian lines Gamma, Fluxes (F) and Equivalent width (EW) Gamma :Power-law Index F : 5-10 keV band F6.4 , EW6.4 : 6.4 keV line F6.7 , EW6.7 : 6.7 keV line Gamma is constant (~1.9) (independent of F6.4/F6.7) F6.4/F6.7 vs Gamma Gamma F6.4/F6.7

5 EW EW6.4 = Constant 100F6.7 10F6.4 Phenomenologically, about 2/3 (1/1.5) of the 5-10 keV flux is associated to the 6.7 keV line and the other 1/3 (0.5/1.5) is associated to the 6.4 keV line. Koyama te al. 2008 F F6.4 F5-10

6 2 x 1.9 + 0.9 ~ 3x 1.4 4 x 1.9 - 0.9 ~ 3x 2.4 6.7 keV “Territory”
Muno et al. 2004 Koyama et al. 2008

7 The 6.4 keV Clump EW=1.8 keV EW=1.8 keV M M

8 (1.5 sigma for the 6.7 keV line)
6.4 keV Line is time variable. (Muno et al. 2007) A Clump near the Radio Arc  Chandra (2002) Suzaku (2005) Sgr A* Sgr A* Chandra (2002) Suzaku (2005) 6.4 keV line * (10-5 photons s-1cm-2) * 4.7 sigma variability (1.5 sigma for the 6.7 keV line)

9 The Sgr B2 Cloud This flux change can not be explained by electrons.
Variability time scale of the 6.4 keV flux ~ ys (Inui et al. 2008) M 0.66 G 0.570 ~10pc This flux change can not be explained by electrons. We need X-ray irradiation. Where is the X-ray source ?

10 1994年 X-ray front 2000年 2004年 2005年

11 2ay=x2 - a2: a = 300 light-years
Sgr A* If the X-ray front has a narrow width ~10 ly, then X-ray reflection zone is parabola, where the origin of the coordinate is Sgr A*

12 Sawada et al. 2004

13 Conclusions Integrated flux of point sources
contributes ~1/6 of the total Galactic center X-rays (GCX). (2) Major fraction of the GCX is diffuse . (3) Plasma temperature of the GC is probably higher than that of the GR. (4) 6.4 keV line clumps are time variable, hence the most probable origin is X-ray reflection.


Download ppt "Katsuji Koyama Kyoto University X-ray or Electron irradiation ?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google