Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Landslides and Other Downslope Movements
2
Unstable Hills 1978: large slab landslide destroyed 24 homes in hills above Laguna Beach Followed heavy rains of El Nino winter No earthquakes or leaking pipes contributed to slide 1979: slope was regraded and homes were rebuilt 2005: new slide destroyed 19 homes on same slopes
3
Forces on a Slope Downslope ground movement is natural part of landscape evolution Gravity pulls rock on slope vertically downward Rock may move slowly in gradual process of creep Can slide or roll down hill Catastrophic when large volume of material moves downslope quickly
4
Forces on a Slope Ability of slope to resist sliding depends on
Total driving force (gravity) pulling it down vs. Resisting force holding it up – strength of material and friction holding it in place When slope will fail depends on Slope steepness Material weight Moisture content
5
Slope and Load Relationship between slope angle (steepness of slope) and load (weight of material on slope) determines slope failure Steeper slope greater downslope force greater likelihood of slope failure Angle of repose: steepest angle at which any loose material is stable Depends on angularity and size of grains and moisture content
6
Figure 8-2: Driving Force and Resisting Force
These two diagrams show the forces on a mass resting on a slope. A steeper slope has a larger force parallel to the slope (red arrow) and is therefore more likely to slide. Note that for the gentler slope, the friction force (f) is larger than the force pulling parallel to the slope (F), whereas for the steeper slope the opposite is true. Clearly the mass on the steeper slope is more likely to slide. Fig. 8-2, p. 186
7
Frictional Resistance and Cohesion
Frictional resistance depends on Slope angle (a) Load (L) Area of contact does not affect frictional resistance Small mass will slide on same slope as large mass, given same material Mass will slide (or slope will fail) when force (F) exceeds frictional resistance (f) If friction is high enough, mass will stay in place Anything that reduces friction increases likelihood that rock will move
8
Frictional Resistance and Cohesion
Cohesion: important force holding soil grains together From surface tension of water between loose grains or cement between grains Can be overcome if sliding force if large enough
9
Figure 8-3: Surface Tension
Fig. 8-3, p. 186
10
Slope Failure Mass will slide if: f + C < F
Frictional resistance + Cohesion < Driving Force f + C < F (N – p) x tan a + C < F resisting force < driving force where N = force perpendicular to the slope (N – p) x tan a is “force against slope minus pore pressure of water” times “tangent of slope angle” p = pore pressure a = slope angle C = cohesion (soil cohesion is soil strength + root strength)
11
Slope Material Material that makes up a slope, topography and moisture content all play a role in slides Loose material above bedrock is inherently weak Sedimentary materials are inherently weak
12
Moisture Content Moisture content determines effect of water on strength of slope Loose soils have 10-45% pore space Small amount of water in pore space increases cohesion Too much water fills pore spaces under pressure and pushes grains apart, reducing cohesion Water pressure at base of slope is under load of water above it
13
Figure 8-4: Water in the Ground
A. Water pressure at depth is equal to the load or weight of the overlying water. B. Water (dark) seeps out of the soil below the sharply defined saturation level exposed in a road cut in Glacier National Park, Montana. Fig. 8-4, p. 187
14
Internal Surfaces Rocks commonly contain planar internal surfaces of weakness, at random angles Layers in sedimentary rock Fractures in any kind of rock Contacts between rocks of different strength Faults Slip surfaces of old landslides Any such surface that is oriented nearly parallel to slope is likely to become a slip surface Daylighted beds: no resisting mass to hold them back Layers that dip at gentler angle than slope of hill
15
Figure 8-6: Daylighted Beds
A. Rock layers dipping about parallel to a slope, with their edges coming to the surface, are said to “daylight.” B. Steeply dipping sheets of granite daylight over Highway 3 in southern British Columbia. Fig. 8-6, p. 188
16
Clays and Clay Behavior
Clays absorb water and expand, and so can weaken rock, even lift it Feldspars (most abundant minerals in rocks) weather to form clay minerals, with structures that can lead to landslides Kaolinite: weak positive and negative charges, soft and weak structure, soaks up water Smectite flakes: form from volcanic ash, with open structure between layers that fills with water swelling soils
17
Clays and Clay Behavior
Quick clays: water-saturated muds in marine bays, estuaries, old saline lakebeds that are especially prone to collapse and flow when disturbed Mixture of fine silt, clay grains and water in tiny pore spaces Flakes deposited in random orientation give mass total pore space of 50% or more If loose arrangement is disturbed, by earthquake or by heavy load on top, quick clay undergoes liquefaction and flows almost like water for few minutes until water escapes, then mass becomes stable and will not flow again Common along northern coasts of Canada, Alaska, Europe
18
Figure 8-7: Collapse of Quick Clays
A. Clay grains deposited in random orientation have especially large pore spaces—a “house of cards” arrangement. B. After collapse, the compacted clays take up much less space, so water in the pore spaces must escape. Fig. 8-7, p. 188
19
Figure 8-8: Flowing Ground
The Lemieux flow in a horizontal terrace of the Leda Clay of the St. Lawrence River valley near Ottawa, Ontario, settled and flowed into the adjacent river on June 20, 1993. Fig. 8-8, p. 189
20
Causes of Landslides Landslides can be caused by
Changes in slope imposed by external factors, such as Undercutting of slope by stream or road-building Loading of upper slope by construction Addition of water Removal of vegetation Instability of slope material Jarring by earthquakes
21
Oversteepening and Overloading
Oversteepening slope increases likelihood of slope failure Slope angle is increased when Fill is added above Construction of homes with magnificent views Slopes are undercut below Erosion at base of slope, by waves at coast Excavation of road at base of slope Balance between forces acting on slope can be upset by Adding material or load at top Removing material from toe
22
Adding Water Additional water reduces strength of slope more likely to slide Heavy or prolonged rainfall saturates soil, increases pore water pressure and causes slides Human actions add water to slopes Lawn-watering, crop irrigation Leaking water or sewer pipes, cracked swimming pools Filling reservoir behind dam
23
Overlapping Causes Worst-case scenario for Mount Rainier, with steep, weak sides: Giant megathrust earthquake in winter, with heavy snowpack soaking soil Strong shaking for three minutes or more collapse of large part of flank of mountain If collapse is toward communities to northwest, tragic consequences
24
Types of Downslope Movement
Classified on basis of type of material, type of movement and rate of movement Categories of blocks of solid bedrock Debris of various sizes coarser than 2 millimeters Earth or soil finer than 2 millimeters Rates of downslope movements depend on Slope steepness Grain size Water content Thickness of moving mass Clay mineral type Amount of material
25
Figure 8-T1 p. 193
26
Rockfalls Rockfalls develop in steep, mountainous areas of cliffs with nearly vertical fractures or weaknesses May be pried loose by freezing water or triggered by ground shaking Large boulders may bounce or roll far from cliff, where smaller fragments collect in talus slope Base of steep slope capped by vertical cliffs that have shed big boulders in past is dangerous
27
Figure 8-17: Rockfall Hazard
Some rockfall problems arise where a strong layer, such as sandstone, overlies a weak layer, like shale or clay, as in this southwestern Utah photo. The largest rocks tend to roll well out from the base of the cliff. Is this a safe place to live? Fig. 8-17, p. 194
28
Rockfalls Rockfall runout is distance rockfall will travel, related to height from which rock falls and its mass Potential energy of rock on slope is converted to kinetic energy when it falls Figure 8-20: Potential Energy to Kinetic Energy
29
Potential Energy of a Rock on a Slope
Depends on mass of rock and height on slope Potential Energy = m x g x h m = mass (kilograms) g = gravitational acceleration (meters per second per second) h = height (meters) When rock falls, potential energy becomes kinetic energy (movement) Highest velocity and greatest kinetic energy at bottom of fall Kinetic energy = ½ m x v2 v = velocity (meters per second)
30
Rockfalls Debris avalanche: rockfall material breaks into small fragments and flows at high velocity in coherent stream 1970: Magnitude 7.7 earthquake on subduction zone off Peru Triggered huge rockfall 130 km away on Mount Nevados Huascaran (highest mountain in Peru) million cubic meters of granite, glacial debris and ice fell meters off vertical cliff Debris avalanche raced down valley, 14 km to Yungay with average speed of 270 km/hr Figure 8-18
31
Figure 8-23: Slide Buries a Town
The Mount Nevados Huascaran debris avalanche in 1970 fell from the peak at the top of the photo and raced down the valley to bury the town of Yungay, which occupied the lower half of the photo. Fig. 8-23, p. 196
32
Rockfalls Mass of rock that falls but does not disintegrate will travel shorter distance as debris avalanche Mechanism for travel of debris avalanches is debated Cushion of compressed air beneath flow? Major debris avalanches (like Elm, Switzerland) scoured ground beneath them, so could not have moved atop cushion of air May flow as fluid composed of rock fragments suspended in air Acoustic fluidization, if air cannot escape spaces between fragments
33
Rotational Slumps Homogeneous, cohesive, soft materials often slide on curving slip surface concave to sky Curvature rotates slide mass as it slips Upper end of slide block tilts back as it moves Lower part of slide moves outward from slope Vertical part of slip surface is headscarp Lowest end of slide mass is toe Calculate and compare driving mass to resisting mass and friction – if driving mass is larger, then mass will slide
34
Figure 8-25: Anatomy of a Rotational Slump
This cross section shows a rotational slump. Note that the failure surface for the driving mass slopes downward (right side of vertical line), and the failure surface for the resisting mass (left side of vertical line) slopes back into the slope. Rotation of a slump block on an arcuate surface also rotates everything on the block. Trees growing on an originally horizontal upper terrace (the Blackfoot landslide in Montana) now tilt back toward the headscarp as a result of rotation. Note the person standing at the left. The headscarp is on the right. Crushed rock is scattered along the failure surface of a landslide at Newport, Oregon. Fig. 8-25, p. 198
35
Translational Slides Move on preexisting weak surfaces more or less parallel to slope Inherently weak layers such as shale Old fault or slide surfaces Fractures Often move faster and farther than rotational slides May move as coherent mass or break up into debris flows
36
Translational Slides Lateral-spreading slides
If loose, water-rich sands or quick clays are present at shallow depth, liquefaction or collapse can send mass moving downslope Some parts sink, some blocks left standing higher Liquefaction can occur on flat surface Does not cause slide but can still collapse buildings
37
Figure 8-26: Rotational Slumps Versus Translational Slides
A rotational slide penetrates deep into the ground; the pre-slide surface and growing trees tilt backward as movement progresses. A translational slide is shallow and parallel to the ground surface; the pre-slide surface may break up, especially at the slide toe. Growing trees remain vertical on the slope but jumble erratic orientations at the toe. Fig. 8-26, p. 198
38
Soil Creep Slow, downslope movement of soil and weak rock
Involves near-surface movement by alternate expansion and shrinkage of soil Expansion pushes out perpendicular to slope Shrinkage collapses particles straight down Net change is slow movement downhill
39
Figure 8-29: Creeping Ground
These trees along California’s Highway 1 west of Leggett have been bent by soil creep, the slow downslope movement of the upper layers of soil or soft rocks. They originally grew upright but were tilted outward by creep. Continued upward growth produced the bending. Creep of sedimentary layers near the ground surface bends their upturned ends downslope (to the right, in this photo). Fig. 8-29, p. 200
40
Snow Avalanches Boundary between layer of dry snow and layer of tightly packed or frozen snow can be zone of weakness Conditions for avalanche formation depend on Slope steepness Weather Temperature Slope-facing direction Wind speed and direction Vegetation Conditions within snowpack
41
Snow Avalanches Trigger for avalanche could be
Weight of skier crossing slope Vibrations of snowmobile Movement of glacier Changes in temperature Earthquake Or avalanche could be spontaneous
42
Snow Avalanches Unstable layers can result from
New snow Temperature changes Buried hoar frost Increased risk should be recognized with Previous dangerous weather conditions Downwind-oriented slopes Cornices with cracks or breakaway zones Gullies
43
Snow Avalanches Surviving an avalanche rules Avoid traveling alone
Carry shovel, probe and avalanche beacon Take deep breath and make air space around face Look for poles or clothing to locate victims
44
Hazards Related to Landslides
Landslides are closely related to other hazards Can be triggered by storms and flooding or by earthquakes When landslide blocks waterway, can cause flooding
45
Earthquakes Eyewitness accounts of great clouds of dust rising from hillsides during and after earthquake Sudden shaking of earthquakes above magnitude 4 can trigger failure in unstable slopes Most earthquake-triggered landslides are rockfalls Less than 1% are debris avalanches or rapid soil flows, but these are most deadly Shaking can cause liquefaction of clays, even in relatively flat ground Buildings tilt or fall over as liquefied ground settles
46
Failure of Landslide Dams
Any moderately fast-moving landslide can block a river or stream to create a dam and temporary lake before eventually failing Time before failure and size of flood depends on Size, height and geometry of dam Material making up dam Rate of stream flow, how fast lake rises Use of engineering controls (artificial breaches, spillways or tunnels) Dams from mudflows, debris flows and earth flows are noncohesive and erode quickly
47
Failure of Landslide Dams
Most landslide dams fail when water overflows and erodes spillway that drains lake If dam-failure flood incorporates significant sediment, can turn into debris flow – much more dangerous Useful dams can be constructed on top of landslide dams Rockfalls or rock slides are most stable 1928 St. Francis high-arch concrete dam failed – built on toe of old landslide
48
Table 8-2: Table 8-2, p. 206
49
Mitigation of Damages from Landslides
Damages can be extremely costly Not covered by most insurance policies In U.S., landslides cost more than $2 billion and cause deaths per year Globally, cost more than $20 billion, cause about 7500 deaths per year Major landslide disasters increase with growth in population in dangerous areas
50
Figure 8-40: Landslide Hazard Map
Landslides are widespread, not only in mountainous areas of the western United States and Canada and in the Appalachians, but also in the subdued terrain of the central United States and Canada. Canadian landslide areas shown in red. Fig. 8-40, p. 207
51
Records of Past Landslides
Existence of past landslides in area indicates circumstances for more in future Hummocky ground surface may be indication Cracks or broad waves in pavement Building roads or structures on slide aids further movement of slope
52
Landslide Hazard Maps Best strategy is to avoid building in places that are prone to landslides Geographic Information System (GIS) can be used to build debris-flow and landslide-hazard maps Prescribe restrictions in land use Area divided into polygons with consistent internal attributes such as characteristics of slope, composition of material, presence of previous failures
53
Engineering Solutions
Engineers can sometimes restore balance among forces to keep slope stable Add load to lower part of slope that is overloaded at top Rock cliffs or slopes sprayed with shotcrete, draped with heavy wire mesh or anchored with rockbolts Plant vegetation to take moisture out of soil through evapotranspiration Artificially drain slopes by increasing permeability with perforated pipes or geotextile fabric
54
Figure 8-42: Weight the Bottom
Heavy boulders are often piled on the lower part of a slide to resist movement. This road, cut through a landslide on U.S. Highway 101 near Garberville, in northern California, has been stabilized by loading its toe area. Fig. 8-42, p. 208
55
Ongoing Landslide Problems: Coastal Area of Los Angeles
Coastal bluffs composed of young sediments, sand and shale Easily break up and landslide, especially when Soaked by unusual amounts of water Undercut by waves or road construction Overloaded by addition of fill Disturbed during almost any kind of construction
56
Ongoing Landslide Problems: Coastal Area of Los Angeles
Portuguese Bend area of Palos Verdes Hills began moving slowly downslope in 1956 after construction In 1979 homeowners placed moratorium on building and hired engineering geologist Determined that movements were reactivation of old translational slide on volcanic ash smectite layer Dewatering wells and storm-drain culverts reduce movement
57
Ongoing Landslide Problems: Coastal Area of Los Angeles
‘Sunken City’ in San Pedro area of Point Fermin began sliding in 1929 In 1941, broken water main accelerated movement July 2011: section of bluff separated, dropped and moved seaward
58
p. 211
59
Slippery Smectite Deposits Create Conditions for Landslide: Forest City Bridge, South Dakota
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers built Oahe Dam across Missouri River in 1950s Smectite layers in Pierre Shale swelled, became extremely slippery Slides began moving down toward reservoir Repaving of roads accumulated 2.1 m of asphalt Engineers excavated broad area of material upslope and piled heavy load on toe to stabilize slopes
60
Figure 8-CIP02b: A huge landslide at the U. S
Figure 8-CIP02b: A huge landslide at the U.S. 212 Forest City Bridge across the Missouri River was reactivated by raising the reservoir level behind Oahe Dam. p. 212
61
House destroyed and family killed
Water leaking from a canal saturates a steep slope and triggers a deadly landslide: Logan Slide, Utah, 2009 20-meter section of water-filled irrigation canal collapsed with hillside House destroyed and family killed Many reports had been filed about leaks in the canal walls but little was done Many questions remained after slide as to exact cause or combination of causes
62
Slide Triggered by Filling a Reservoir: The Vaiont Landslide, Italy, 1963
Filling reservoir behind new Vaiont Dam caused a catastrophic mountainside collapse Unstable sides of valley included ancient slide plane For three years, engineers monitored slope above reservoir, expecting occasional small slides Heavy rains in summer 1963 filled reservoir to within 12 m of spillway, increasing water pressure in surrounding rocks Slope was creeping at 1-30 cm/week, then 25 cm/day, then 100 cm/day Engineers recognized danger and began lowering water level in reservoir, but too late
63
Slide Triggered by Filling a Reservoir: The Vaiont Landslide, Italy, 1963
October 9, 1963, 10:41 pm: 238 million cubic meters of rock and debris collapsed off mountain face just upstream of dam, at 90 km/hr Slide generated earthquakes, violent blast of air Filled 2 km of reservoir, went 260 m up other side of reservoir Displaced water swept over dam in wave 125 m high Wave destroyed 5 villages downstream of dam Second wave upstream through reservoir, destroying town 2,533 people killed within few minutes Dam remained almost undamaged
64
Slide Triggered by Filling a Reservoir: The Vaiont Landslide, Italy, 1963
Engineering warning signs had been disregarded: Drilling encountered broken rock with much pore space Tunnel was excavated through strongly sheared zone, but no further investigation Solution fractures upslope collect surface runoff increase internal pore-water pressure in rocks above reservoir Lesson: Slopes that seem to be only moving slowly may suddenly fail catastrophically
65
Figure 8-CIP04b: The 1963 Vaiont slide moved catastrophically on weak layers of shale within limestone beds parallel to the mountain face. A. Cross section of the valley. B. The slip surface is in the upper right; the slide mass fills the center of the view, and the dam is just out of sight in the lower right. The highway looping around the toe of the slide mass in mid-view provides scale. C. The dam, viewed from downstream, survived even though a high-velocity wave of water 125 meters high swept over it (up to the yellow line) and killed more than 2,500 people downstream. p. 215
66
A Rockfall Triggered by Blasting: Frank Slide, Alberta, 1903
Coal mine cuts low on mountainside destabilized rock face Began as translational slide, developed into debris avalanche as it gained speed Swept across and buried town, killing 70 of 600 inhabitants Miners working in mountain at time were below slide scarp and were later rescued
67
Figure 8-CIP05b: A. The Frank slide peeled off the whole east face of Turtle Mountain and spread a spectacular bouldery deposit across the valley and up the slope to the west. Huge limestone boulders are part of the Frank slide deposit. B. This cross section shows the slope before and after the Frank slide. Fracture sets in some rocks and approximately parallel bedding surfaces in other rocks provided zones of weakness. p. 216
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.