1. Elena Nikulina, the World Bank
Links Between Public Procurement and Financial Management Information Systems in PEMPAL Countries
Treasury COP
Thematic Survey Results
Elena Nikulina, the World Bank
Budapest, Hungary
June 5, 2019

2. Survey Objectives and Coverage
- survey undertaken in preparation for the ongoing Annual Plenary Meeting, used as input to the event agenda
- served the basis for this presentation, expected to establish a common ground for today’s discussion on interaction between the e-procurement and treasury information systems
- contribution to PEMPAL knowledge bank of methodological, legal and analytical documentation
Coverage
responses received during April 29 – May 16 from all 16 TCOP countries attending the meeting
THANKS TO EVERYONE!!!
Only primary processing and analysis of the data undertaken, no deeper quality assurance

3. Which body is in charge of regulating public procurement in your country?
Belarus – Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade
Georgia – Public Procurement Agency under the Government
Kyrgyz Republic - Department of state procurement in MOF
Tajikistan - Agency for state procurement of goods, works and services under the Government
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Croatia
Kazakhstan
Albania
Russia
Kosovo
Belarus
Ukraine
Moldova
Georgia
North Macedonia
Kyrgyz Republic
Turkey
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan

4. Availability of Operational E-Procurement Systems
Country
URL
Albania
Armenia
Belarus
Croatia
Georgia
Kazakstan
Kosovo
Kyrgyz Republic
zakupki.gov.kg
Moldova
North Macedonia
Russia
Turkey
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Total 14
E-procurement systems are operational in the majority of countries (14).
Azerbaijan and Tajikistan have plans to develop such systems.

5. Coverage and Use of E-Procurement Systems
Country
e-Purchasing or e-Catalog
e-Tendering
e-Quotations or e-Shopping
Albania x
Armenia
Belarus
Croatia
Georgia
Kazakstan
Kosovo
Kyrgyz Republic
Moldova
North Macedonia
Russia
Turkey
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Total 12 13 9
E- tendering – acquisition of goods, works and services that are of high value and low volume
E-purchasing or
E-catalogues – procurement of goods and services of low value and high volume
E-shopping or
E-quotations – low value and low volume items

6. Coverage and Use of E-Procurement Systems – Type / Size of Tenders / Contracts
The use of E-procurement systems is mandatory for all types of contracts / tenders in Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyz Republic, and Russia
In 6 countries it is mandatory for contracts above certain value.
Country
Contracts / tenders of certain type / value above a set amount
Albania
more than 800,000 ALL or 6,400 EUR
Armenia
more than 1 million drams
Belarus
more than 300 base values (base value BYN)
Croatia
procurement of goods and services set at an estimated value equal to or above HRK 200,000 ($ 30,200) and for all works set at an estimated value equal to or above HRK 500,000 ($ 75,600)
North Macedonia
all contracts above 1,000 euros for goods and services, 5,000 euros for works and 10,000 euros for special services on annual level
Ukraine
7,500 USD and above
Total 6

7. The use of the E-Procurement system is mandatory for contracts financed from…
Country
Central government budget
Subnational government budgets
Extrabudgetary resources
Donor financed projects and grants
Albania Y
Armenia
Belarus
Croatia
Georgia
Kazakstan
Kosovo
Kyrgyz Republic
Moldova
North Macedonia
Russia
Turkey
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Total 14 13 9 3

8. Existence and Type of Data Exchange Interface between the E-Procurement System and FMIS

9. Level of Development of Information Exchange between the E-Procurement and FMIS Systems
The most common purposes of information exchange:
- automatic recording of all newly signed contracts (unique IDs) with respective payment schedules in relevant FMIS modules to ensure registration of annual commitments (7 countries),
- recording of all contract amendments and delivery of outputs (6),
creation (online via e-Procurement system) or transfer from FMIS of the procurement plans (5)
facilitating preparation, processing and verification of payments related to tenders between public authorities and their vendors (5)
facilitating preparation of detailed information reports to inform auditing, reporting and decision making (5)

10. Purpose of Information Exchange between the E-Procurement and FMIS Systems (1)
Russia
Kazakstan
Uzbekistan
Armenia
Georgia
Kyrgyz Republic
Ukraine
Moldova
Total
Past procurement data made available in e-Procurement system to prepare forecasts for future spending in FMIS X 4
Creation (online via e-Procurement system) or transfer from FMIS of the procurement plans 5
Restricting the publication of tenders that exceed budget (appropriations) available to the spending unit
Restricting the publication of tenders that exceed budget (appropriations) available to a spending unit under specific budget activities/codes 3
Initiating the workflow for revision of the spending unit’s budget in FMIS before contract signature, if estimated value of the tender exceeds available budget appropriation 2
Verification whether potential budget revisions during the procurement process have not rendered a particular procurement beyond budget allocations

11. Purpose of Information Exchange between the E-Procurement and FMIS Systems (2)
Russia
Kazakstan
Uzbekistan
Armenia
Georgia
Kyrgyz Republic
Ukraine
Moldova
Total
Verification that the awarded contract price is not above the estimated contract value and hence beyond budget allocation X 4
Automatic recording of all newly signed contracts (unique ids) with respective payment schedules in relevant FMIS modules ensuring registration of annual commitments 7
Automatic recording of all newly signed contracts (unique ids) with respective payment schedules in relevant FMIS modules ensuring registration of multiannual commitments 3
Facilitating preparation, processing and verification of payments related to tenders between public authorities and their vendors 5
Recording of all contract amendments and delivery of outputs 6
Facilitating preparation of detailed information reports to inform auditing, reporting and decision making 12 9 1

12. Conclusions
Responsibility for public procurement is clearly defined in all the countries and in many countries it is part of the mandate of the Ministry of Finance
E-procurement systems are operational in the majority of countries and their coverage and use is expanding, so there is a strong rationale to develop information linkages with the FMISs
Linkages are already established only in some countries and in most cases are limited, there is a room to develop and expand them further
There are countries within the TCOP that are very advanced in this area and their experience could be useful for the others
The topic is well chosen and has a potential to be explored further at the future meetings

13. Thank you for your attention!