Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Aaron M. Bernie, M.D., M.P.H., Douglas A. Mata, M.D., M.P.H., Ranjith Ramasamy, M.D., Peter N. Schlegel, M.D., F.A.C.S.  Fertility and Sterility  Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages e3 (November 2015) DOI: /j.fertnstert Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 (A) Meta-analysis of the association of cTESE vs. micro-TESE with SR outcome for men with nonobstructive azoospermia. (B) Meta-analysis of the association of TESA vs. cTESE with SR outcome for men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertility and Sterility  , e3DOI: ( /j.fertnstert ) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

3 Supplemental Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Fertility and Sterility  , e3DOI: ( /j.fertnstert ) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

4 Supplemental Figure 2 Funnel plot assessment of publication bias.
Fertility and Sterility  , e3DOI: ( /j.fertnstert ) Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google