Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Aortic valve preservation in acute type a dissection: Is it sound?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Aortic valve preservation in acute type a dissection: Is it sound?"— Presentation transcript:

1 Aortic valve preservation in acute type a dissection: Is it sound?
Ludwig K. von Segesser, MD (by invitation), Enrico Lorenzetti, (by invitation), Mario Lachat, MD (by invitation), Urs Niederhäuser, MD (by invitation), Mariette Schönbeck, MD (by invitation), Paul R. Vogt, MD (by invitation), Marko I. Turina, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996) DOI: /S (96) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

2 Fig. 1 Actuarial survival probabilities of all patients undergoing operations for acute type A aortic dissection (±95% errors). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

3 Fig. 2 Actuarial survival probabilities of patients with supracoronary grafts (squares) versus patients with composite grafts (rhombi) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference between groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

4 Fig. 3 Actuarial probability of freedom from reoperation for all patients (±95% errors). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

5 Fig. 4 Actuarial probability of freedom from reoperation for patients with supracoronary grafts (squares) versus those with composite grafts (rhombi) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference between groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

6 Fig. 5 Actuarial probability of freedom from reoperation for patients with preserved or repaired aortic valves (squares) versus those with mechanical aortic valves (rhombi) versus those with biologic aortic valves (triangles) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference among groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

7 Fig. 6 Actuarial freedom from thromboembolism for patients with preserved or repaired native aortic valves (squares) versus those with mechanical aortic valves (rhombi) versus those with biologic aortic valves (triangles) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference among groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

8 Fig. 7 Actuarial freedom from late events for patients with supracoronary grafts (squares) versus those with composite grafts (rhombi) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference between groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

9 Fig. 8 Actuarial freedom from late events for patients with preserved or repaired native aortic valves (squares) versus those with mechanical aortic valves (rhombi) versus those with biologic aortic valves (triangles) (±95% errors). There is no statistically significant difference among groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (96) ) Copyright © 1996 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Aortic valve preservation in acute type a dissection: Is it sound?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google