1. Communication Privacy Management (Sandra Petronio)
Theory w/ a million names…
Still S-D, but applied to established Rs

2. Fundamental Assumptions
We constantly !
vs (viewed as equally good)
(disclosing info freely)
Promotes intimacy
Risks vulnerability
(keeping info private)
Promotes autonomy
Risks isolation
S-D defines privacy conceptual border around private info, differs in (deg. of access ease)
*S-D* by one requires *response* from other
Boundary coordination –

3. Things Discloser Must Consider!
Expectat’s for comm
(implies level of control over partner)
Message
Direct, obvious, no respondent UC
Can restrain respondent
Indirect, vague, lots of respondent UC
Freedom for respondent

4. Things the Respondent Must Consider!
Evaluation of
Figure out what motivat. S-D
Figure out what response they want
Knowing motivat. makes response options easier (e.g., give them what they ask for/want), but still ____________
Strategy Choice
Direct Message -
Indirect Message -

5. Coordinations… Change based on: Over time, can become
Can be manipulated by both people to affect self, partner, or R.

6. Types of Boundary Coordination
Explicit
Demand
Implicit
Demand
Satisfactory
Fit
*e.g., traditional R’s
Overcompensatory
*e.g., withdraw/demand
Deficient
*e.g., demand/withdraw
Equivocal
*e.g., separates
Direct
response
Indirect response
Types of Boundary Coordination

7. Durham & Braithwaite (2009, p. 48)