Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Arno River Basin Authority

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Arno River Basin Authority"— Presentation transcript:

1 Arno River Basin Authority
Ing. Bernardo Mazzanti Bruxelles, 5-6th march 2012 Test Annual Equations Test Annual Equations for separate SW and GW Calculate the water deficit based on the hydrological balance for a long timeserie Calculate the supplementary indicators water demand/water abstraction Correlate calculated WEI+ with SPI Calculate WEI+ without Environmental Flow Draft methodology for threshold definition Provide a memo for assumptions and proxies Provide expert view on usefulness, capabilities and limitations

2 Case study: Arno river basin
Basin surface: 8228 sq. km Water balance for SW (distributed model, daily aggregation) Water balance for GW (lumped model for 17 water bodies, monthly scale) Period: Min discharge: 2,2 mc/s (aug 1931) Max discharge: 2290 mc/s (nov 1966) Annual average total abstraction: 660 Ml mc

3 Test Annual Equations 1 4

4 Test Annual Equations 8

5 Test Equations for separate SW and GW
1 SW GW

6 Test Equations for separate SW and GW
4 SW GW

7 Test Equations for separate SW and GW
8 SW GW

8 Calculate the water deficit based on the hydrological balance for a long timeserie

9 Correlate calculated WEI+ with SPI
4

10 Calculate WEI+ without Environmental Flow
2 3 2 4

11 Draft methodology for threshold definition
10% perc. Q355 4

12 Draft methodology for threshold definition

13 Assumptions and proxies
Data Confidence Precipitation High Evapotranspiration Moderate Storage SW Storage GW Low Water use/return – irrigation Water use/return – industry Moderate (high number of withsmall wihdrawals) Water use/return – water supply Environmetal flow High (stated by law; Basin Plan) Water supply Irrigation Industry

14 Usefulness, capabilities and limitations of tested WEI+ estimates
Eq. 1, 4, 8 seem to give best results (higher variability between dry and wet years) Opt. 1: simple, robust formula Opt. 4: Eflow in the numerator, as "requested water" Opt. 8: small DS values doesn't influence results SW/GW estimates could bring a deeper look in exploitation description (even if internal flow attribution to SW/GW is coupled with higher uncertainty) No clear correlation with SPI index Only a lower threshold seems to be derived from discharge analysis (i.e. WEI+<20% means no critical condition)

15 Monthly exercise

16 Monthly exercise


Download ppt "Arno River Basin Authority"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google