1. Status of Combined Sewer Overflow Abatement
February 9-11, 2016
Agenda Item 12

2. Pennsylvania – 10 Communities
West Virginia – 10 Communities
Ohio – 10 Communities
Kentucky – 10 Communities
Indiana – 7 Communities
Illinois – 2 Communities

5. *New Boston is not required to submit a LTCP.

6. Long Term Control Plan (LCTP) Status
Pennsylvania
RAJSA has had some delays in its LTCP implementation.
DEP believes they have worked through those (not finalized) and expect the LTCP Task implementation to begin again soon.
ALCOSAN has developed their LTCP/Wet Weather Plan (WWP).
Agencies have reviewed it and require re-negotiation on some provisions of the existing Consent Decree (CD).
Coraopolis Borough submitted a revised LTCP.
The revised LTCP submittal is slated for Department review.
West Virginia
Benwood, Wheeling, McMechen, and Kenova have not had their LTCPs approved yet.

7. Long Term Control Plan (LCTP) Status
Ohio
New Boston Facility will not be required to submit a LTCP.
They are working towards elimination of their two CSOs. 
Indiana
Evansville has had their LTCP approved by the State.
Kentucky   
Owensboro has submitted a LTCP for approval.
Ashland has had their LTCP approved by the State.
Illinois
Cairo has submitted a LTCP EZ Form.
They are required to submit yearly reports showing efforts to secure grant funding to build a new effluent pump station and renovate the 10th Street Pump Station. This will provide a reduction of overflow events and volumes.

8. State Updates
ALCOSAN is proposing to eliminate twelve (12) CSO outfall structures from their permit.
Pennsylvania Agencies are attempting to incorporate more GI proposals within ALCOSANs WWP and outline them within the re-negotiated federal Consent Decree (CD).
EPA plans to allow the City of Pittsburgh/PWSA to evaluate and develop a flow reduction proposal. EPA will be taking the lead on that Enforcement Order.
Rochester, Middleport and Tell City have eliminated some CSOs.

9. Annual CSO Performance Data
ORSANCO staff has been working with Region 5 to retrieve CSO data for electronically through EPAs Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) database. This database will make gathering data easier in the future. The Communities are making progress by submitting performance data through electronic Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) as shown in the table below.
Annual Performance data was only available for 21 of the 49 CSO Communities on the Ohio River.

10. State Summary of CSO Performance Data
This is a four year snapshot of the data and it is highly variable due to precipitation and lack of data from year to year. ORSANCO will continue to retrieve annual CSO performance data electronically and present the results to the Technical Committee.
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Ohio
2012 Discharge Events 63
2017
799
2571
2013 Discharge Events
109
2202
853
2755
2014 Discharge Events 24
1908
724
1877
2015 Discharge Events
309
1769
850
2012 Duration (hrs)
6251
2945
966
2013 Duration (hrs)
10529
6605
2367
2014 Duration (hrs)
13404
3802
4196
2015 Duration (hrs)
10672
4967
2012 Flow (MG)
1048
227
1465
2013 Flow (MG)
3330
903
1968
2014 Flow (MG)
2937
369
2015 Flow (MG)
3001
277

11. Questions?