Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived from data generated under study-specific assumptions. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves ... Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived from data generated under study-specific assumptions. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves ... Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived from data generated under study-specific assumptions. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves ... Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived from data generated under study-specific assumptions. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves with the first-stage intervention ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (IO) and the second-stage intervention ibrutinib maintenance (IM), for all simulated patients and for subgroups of simulated patients who did and did not achieve minimal residual disease negative with complete response (MRD- CR) status. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves with first-stage intervention ibrutinib plus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (IVO) and second-stage intervention IM or IM discontinuation, for all simulated patients and for subgroups of simulated patients who did and did not achieve MRD- CR status. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Ann Oncol, Volume 30, Issue 4, 25 February 2019, Pages 542–550, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 1. SMART Schema. Both randomizations (R) use the use the initial stratification factors of baseline Rai stage ... Figure 1. SMART Schema. Both randomizations (R) use the use the initial stratification factors of baseline Rai stage (intermediate versus high) and FISH abnormality del(17)(p13.1) at baseline (present versus absent). Ibrutinib maintenance (IM) in stage 2 continues until disease progression, death, or unacceptable adverse events. Patients randomized to IM discontinuation would not receive any ibrutinib therapy following re-randomization. Embedded treatment regimen (1, 1) includes patients randomized to ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab followed by IM, regardless of minimal residual disease negative with complete response (MRD- CR) status; embedded treatment regimen (2, 1) includes patients randomized to ibrutinib plus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab followed by IM, regardless of MRD- CR status; embedded treatment regimen (2, 2) includes patients randomized to ibrutinib plus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab followed by IM for those who do not achieve MRD- CR status and IM discontinuation for those who do achieve MRD- CR status. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Ann Oncol, Volume 30, Issue 4, 25 February 2019, Pages 542–550, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves for each embedded treatment regimen, derived from data generated under study-specific ... Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves for each embedded treatment regimen, derived from data generated under study-specific assumptions. Embedded treatment regimen (1, 1) includes simulated patients in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (IO) arm with ibrutinib maintenance (IM); embedded treatment regimen (2, 1) includes simulated patients in the ibrutinib plus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (IVO) arm with IM, regardless of minimal residual disease negative with complete response (MRD- CR) status; embedded treatment regimen (2, 2) includes simulated patients in the IVO arm with IM for those who did not achieve MRD- CR status and IM discontinuation for those who did achieve MRD- CR status. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Ann Oncol, Volume 30, Issue 4, 25 February 2019, Pages 542–550, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.


Download ppt "Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived from data generated under study-specific assumptions. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves ... Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves derived."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google