1. Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 533-546 (April 2015)
AXL Mediates Resistance to PI3Kα Inhibition by Activating the EGFR/PKC/mTOR Axis in Head and Neck and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas 
Moshe Elkabets, Evangelos Pazarentzos, Dejan Juric, Qing Sheng, Raphael A. Pelossof, Samuel Brook, Ana Oaknin Benzaken, Jordi Rodon, Natasha Morse, Jenny Jiacheng Yan, Manway Liu, Rita Das, Yan Chen, Angela Tam, Huiqin Wang, Jinsheng Liang, Joseph M. Gurski, Darcy A. Kerr, Rafael Rosell, Cristina Teixidó, Alan Huang, Ronald A. Ghossein, Neal Rosen, Trever G. Bivona, Maurizio Scaltriti, José Baselga 
Cancer Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
DOI: /j.ccell
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

2. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 533-546DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.010)
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 1
PI3K/AKT-Independent mTOR Activation in BYL719-Resistant Cells
(A) Main genetic features and IC50 for BYL719 of 58 cell lines from H&N and esophageal SCC. Amp and Mut, amplification and mutation.
(B) Proliferation (5 days) of four cell lines sensitive to BYL719 in comparison with their resistant counterparts upon increasing doses of BYL719.
(C) Western blot analysis of PI3K/AKT pathway signaling using cell lysates from BYL719-sensitive (S) and BYL719-resistant (R) cells treated with 1 μM BYL719 for 4 hr and the indicated antibodies.
(D) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of protein lysates from BYL719-resistant cells upon 4 hr of treatment with 100 nM RAD001 or 500 nM AZD8055 with and without 1 μM BYL719.
(E) Ranking of knockdown genes that re-sensitize resistant cells to BYL719 (Z score).
Data are presented as means ± SEM; p values were calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. ∗∗p < 0.01.
See also Figure S1 and Table S1.
Cancer Cell  , DOI: ( /j.ccell )
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 2
Role of EGFR in Maintaining mTOR Activity upon BYL719 Treatment
(A) Results from a secretome screen conducted in CAL33 cells upon treatment for 4 days with 1 μM BYL719. Each square represents the average of three replicates of cells conditioned with the same ligand. The y axis shows relative cell growth as a percentage of DMSO.
(B) Heatmap showing the effects of recombinant ligands in limiting the antiproliferative activity of 1 μM of BYL719 for 6 days in H&N and esophageal SCC cell lines. Red and orange indicate full and partial rescue from treatment, respectively.
(C) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of the CAL33 cell line treated for 4 hr with 1 μM BYL719, 10 μg/ml cetuximab, and 1 μM MGCD265 in the presence of 50 ng/ml EGF or HGF as indicated.
(D) Proliferation (6 days) of CAL33 cells treated as indicated with 1 μM BYL719, 10 μg/ml cetuximab (Cetux.), and 1 μM MGCD265 in the presence of 50 ng/ml EGF or HGF.
(E) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of protein lysates from CAL33R and KYSE180R cells treated with 1 μM BYL719 in combination with either 1 μM MGCD265 or 5 μM erlotinib.
(F) Proliferation (5 days) of resistant cell lines treated with different concentrations of erlotinib or MGCD265 with or without 1 μM BYL719. Significance of erlotinib + BYL versus erlotinib is displayed.
Data are presented as means ± SEM; p values were calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. ∗∗p < See also Figure S2 and Table S2.
Cancer Cell  , DOI: ( /j.ccell )
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 3 Antitumor Activity of BYL719 in Combination with Cetuximab
(A) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of protein lysates from resistant cells treated as indicated with 1 μM BYL719, 5 μg/ml cetuximab (Cetux.), or the combination.
(B) Proliferation (6 days) of resistant cells treated with 1 μM BYL719, 5 μg/ml cetuximab, or the combination.
(C) Tumor growth of KYSE180R-derived xenografts treated as indicated (n = 6–10 per arm). Significance of combination versus cetuximab is displayed.
(D) KYSE180R-derived xenograft tumors from mice treated as indicated were analyzed for proliferation (Ki67) and apoptosis (TUNEL).
(E) Cell viability (4 days) of 23 cell lines intrinsically resistant to BYL719 treated with 3 μM BYL719, 10 ng/ml cetuximab, or the combination.
(F) Tumor growth of A253- and HSC3-derived xenografts (intrinsically resistant to BYL719) treated as indicated (n = 6–10 per arm). Significance of combination versus cetuximab is displayed.
(G) Cell viability (4 days) of 35 cell lines intrinsically sensitive to BYL719 treated with 3 μM BYL719, 10 ng/ml cetuximab, or the combination.
(H) Tumor growth of xenograft derived from BYL719-sensitive cell lines treated as indicated (n = 6–10 per arm). For CAL33, the significance of combination versus cetuximab is displayed. For HSC2, the significance of combination versus BYL719 is displayed.
Data are presented as means ± SEM; p value was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < Scale bar, 100 μm. See also Figure S3 and Table S3.
Cancer Cell  , DOI: ( /j.ccell )
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 4
Upregulation of AXL in BYL719-Resistant Tumors and Direct Interaction with EGFR
(A) Dot plot analysis from RNA-seq of KYSE180 and CAL33 cells compared to their resistant counterparts.
(B) AXL levels in the indicated sensitive (S) and resistant (R) cell lines treated with 1 μM BYL719.
(C) Tumor growth of KYSE180-derived xenografts treated with 50 mg/kg BYL719 daily. AXL levels in control tumors (vehicle) and in xenografts after treatment with BYL719 for 2 months are shown. Scale bar, 100 μm.
(D) Comparison of IC50 between SCC cells with high and low (first vs. fourth quartile) AXL mRNA expression (data extracted from the TCGA).
(E) Baseline AXL expression on a panel of BYL719-sensitive and -resistant cell lines.
(F) Boxplot representation of tumor volume as a function of AXL levels quantified in patient tissue samples by IHC. Axl levels are split into three groups from high expressing on the left to low expressing on the right. For each group, the tumor volume distribution is represented by its statistics; the median is represented by the middle line; the interquartile range (25%–75%), by the box; and the minimum and maximum, by the whiskers.
(G) Changes in AXL levels following BYL719 treatment in three SCC patients. Pre, pre-treatment samples; Post, samples collected at disease progression upon BYL719 therapy.
(H) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of whole cell lysates (WCL) or proteins immunoprecipitated with an anti-EGFR antibody (IP) from the indicated cell lines. EGF (50 ng/ml) was supplemented to the culture media 20 min prior to lysate collection. IgG, control immunoglobulin G.
(I) Proximity ligation assay (PLA) of AXL and EGFR on parental and resistant cells. Quantification of AXL/EGFR complex was carried out using ImageJ. Scale bar, 25 μm.
Data are presented as means ± SEM; p value was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < See also Figure S4 and Table S4.
Cancer Cell  , DOI: ( /j.ccell )
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 5
AXL/EGFR Drives mTOR Activation and Causes Resistance to BYL719
(A) Cell viability of CAL33 and KYSE70 cells overexpressing either WT or kinase-dead (KD) AXL upon treatment with BYL719 (upper panel) and western blot showing both endogenous and exogenous expression of AXL (lower panel). EV, empty vector; HA, hemagglutinin tag.
(B) Cell viability (3 days) of KYSE180R and CAL33R cells subjected to AXL knockdown and treated as indicated (upper panel) and western blot showing AXL knockdown (lower panel). siCT, small interfering control (scrambled) RNA; siAXL, small interfering RNA targeting AXL.
(C) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of cell lysates from KYSE180R cells treated for 4 hr with different concentrations of R428 and 1 μM of BYL719.
(D) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of cell lysates from KYSE180R treated with 1 μM BYL719, 1 μM R428, or the combination at different time points.
(E) Cell viability (4 days) of cells with acquired resistance to BYL719 treated with increased concentrations of R428 with or without 1 μM of BYL719.
Data are presented as means ± SEM; p value was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < Scale bar, 100 μm. See also Figure S5 and Tables S5 and S6.
Cancer Cell  , DOI: ( /j.ccell )
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 6 AXL/EGFR Complexes Activate mTOR via PLCγ-PKC Signaling
(A) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of protein lysates from the indicated cell lines. S, BYL719 sensitive; R, BYL719 resistant.
(B) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of protein lysates from CAL33R and KYSE180R cells treated for 4 hr with 5 μM of erlotinib (Erlo), with or without 1 μM BYL719.
(C) Immunoprecipitation (IP) of EGFR1173 and western blot with the indicated antibodies of CAL33R treated for 4 hr with 1 μM R428. WCL, whole cell lysates. IgG, control immunoglobulin G.
(D) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of protein lysates from KYSE180R cells treated for 4 hr with different PKC inhibitors (0.5 μM PKC412, 1 μM Enzastaurin, 10 μM Go6967, 10 μM BIMVIII, 2 μM BIMI, 10 μM Go6983, and 5 μM Rottlerin) with or without 1 μM BYL719.
(E) Western blot with the indicated antibodies of protein lysates from KYSE180R cells treated with PKC412 and BYL719 as indicated.
(F) Cell viability (4 days) of the indicated cell lines in the presence of 1 μM BYL719 and different concentrations of PKC412.
(G) Analysis of cell cycle (S-phase arrest) and cell survival (annexin V) in BYL719-resistant cells after 48 hr of treatment with 1 μM BYL719, 0.5 μM PKC412, or their combination. Means of two independent experiments performed in duplicate per cell line are shown.
Data are presented as means ± SEM; p value was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t test. ∗∗p < See also Figure S6.
Cancer Cell  , DOI: ( /j.ccell )
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

9. Figure 7
Scheme Summarizing the Proposed Mechanism by which AXL Drives Resistance to PI3Kα in SCC
Upregulation of AXL and its interaction with EGFR leads to PLCγ-PKC activation via phosphorylation of EGFR on tyrosine This results in sustained mTOR activity upon PI3Kα suppression. Combination of PI3Kα inhibition with EGFR, AXL, or PKC suppression would prevent this occurrence by blocking the PLCγ/PKC axis, resulting in superior antitumor activity compared with monotherapy.
Cancer Cell  , DOI: ( /j.ccell )
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions