1. Assessment
Spring 2016

2. 2014 Multi-State Collaborative
2005
Liberal Education and America’s Promise
VALUE rubrics
Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education
2014 Multi-State Collaborative

3. Hawaii Maine Texas

4. Project
Pilot Year 1 Scorer (Meg); 2-day training in Kansas City, MO VCC partnered with ICC and HCC to contribute artifacts Written Communication Rubric
Demonstration Year 1 Scorer (Meg); 2-day training in Kansas City, MO VCC contributed independently to project (ICC stayed in; HCC left.) Written Communication & Critical Thinking Rubrics
Refinement Year 4 Scorers (Sara, O’Niell, Jim, and Meg); online training April 2017 VCC contribute to project? Written Communication, Critical Thinking, Civic Engagement; Quantitative Literacy Rubrics

5. MSC Pilot by the Numbers
7,215 pieces of student work were submitted [number of pieces of work approximates number of student participants]
Students had to be 75% of the way to completion of institutional degree requirements
2,642 artifacts scored twice (36.6%) in order to measure inter-rater reliability
1,166 assignments were submitted [number of assignments approximates number of faculty participants]
These results are not generalizable across participating states or the nation in any way. Please use appropriately.
6/7/2019

6. Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary
These slides summarize results from a proof-of-concept pilot study involving 59 institutions in nine states using common rubrics to assess more than 7,000 student work products. The sample of student work in the pilot represented the near-graduation students across the participating institutions in the nine states only; therefore, the results are not generalizable for all students in each participating state or nationwide.

7. MSC Pilot by the Numbers
MSC states: Connecticut, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah
59 public institutions uploaded artifacts
By sector:
28 four-year, including 8 research institutions
31 two-year
These results are not generalizable across participating states or the nation in any way. Please use appropriately.
6/7/2019

8. Faculty and Staff Responses to Usefulness of VALUE Rubrics for Assessing Student Work
Percent of scorers who reported Strongly Agree or Agree with each aspect of rubric use
6/7/2019

9. VALUE Rubrics?

12. 28 artifacts shared S2016

13. March 31-April 2

19. FALL 2016
G1, G2 (Everyone): 1. Collect and assess student work 2. Report on results Fall VALUE Rubrics Assignment charette at NHED Duty Day
SPRING 2017G9, G10: 1. Consider using VALUE Rubrics? 2. Consider working in teams to develop rubrics to assess student work Assignment charette at VCC Duty Day S2017

20. Questions?