Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

e-notes (c) Curtis H. Whitson

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "e-notes (c) Curtis H. Whitson"— Presentation transcript:

1 e-notes (c) Curtis H. Whitson
Gas Tubing Flow Vert Flow Equation Unit Conversion Units The gas tubing or VFP (vertical flow performance) rate equation defines the relationship between surface gas rate and pressure drawdown (bottomhole flowing pressure minus tubinghead flowing pressure). This relationship is also called “tubing performance” or tubing “backpressure curve”. Tubing diameter is the most important variable defining a well’s tubing performance under steady (turbulent-dominated) flow conditions. Tubing performance deteriorates dramatically when the gas tubing velocity drops below a certain minimum value - a value where 100% of the liquids is no longer carried as droplets or a film to the surface. Instead, some of the liquid falls downward causing significant liquid-dominated hydrostatic pressure drop. Very high gas flow rates may cause tubing failure due to erosion. Optimal tubing design should try to minimize pressure losses, liquid loading, erosional velocity, tubing cost, and hole- size (drilling & completion) requirements. The basic form of the gas tubing equation qg=C(pw2-pt2)0.5 is often applicable even for very rich gas condensates, though it may be difficult to predict a priori the tubing constant C with standard (‘dry gas’) equations. July 2, 2019 e-notes (c) Curtis H. Whitson

2 e-notes (c) Curtis H. Whitson
References Fetkovich, Multipoint Testing of Gas Wells Golan-Whitson, Well Performance excerpts Turner, Minimum Rate to Lift Correlation Craig, Erosional Velocity Examples Tubing performance calculation spreadsheet Gas Production Forecasting. Fetkovich multirate test example. Golan-Whitson, Well Performance examples. Notes July 2, 2019 e-notes (c) Curtis H. Whitson


Download ppt "e-notes (c) Curtis H. Whitson"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google