Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nationalism v. Sectionalism

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nationalism v. Sectionalism"— Presentation transcript:

1 Nationalism v. Sectionalism

2 Push of Nationalism Following the War of 1812, nationalism was at an all time high People wanted what was best for the country as a whole Many wanted to make the country stronger and self-reliant

3 American System Henry Clay’s nationalist plan to make the country self reliant American System called for: Protective Tariff National Bank Good Transportation (roads, canals)

4 Rise of Sectionalism Not everyone was a nationalist
More and more people bought into sectionalism Having loyalty to a certain section of the country (North, South, or West) over the nation as a whole Different regions had different goals and interests that did not match Many nationalists fell victim to sectionalism including Henry Clay (West), John C Calhoun (South) and Daniel Webster (North)

5 Missouri Compromise Missouri was eligible to become a state
Problem: It wanted to be a slave state and made things uneven in government Many Northern states had made slavery illegal Nationalist Henry Clay suggested a compromise (Missouri Compromise) to save the country Missouri would come in as a slave state, Maine as a free state and drew a line above which no new states could have slaves.

6

7 Election of 1824 Election dominated by Sectionalism
Following Era of Good Feelings, 4 people run for president John Quincy Adams (North) Andrew Jackson (South and West) Henry Clay (West) William Crawford (South) Jackson gets the most votes, but not a majority Since we have no winner, the top two go to the House of Representatives Jackson and Adams Clay, Speaker of the House of Representatives and convinces his supporters to vote Adams Clay later became the Secretary of State for Adams (corrupt bargain)

8


Download ppt "Nationalism v. Sectionalism"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google