Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Strong Limits on a Variable Proton to Electron Mass Ratio ()

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Strong Limits on a Variable Proton to Electron Mass Ratio ()"— Presentation transcript:

1 Strong Limits on a Variable Proton to Electron Mass Ratio ()
from Ammonia Inversion Lines C. Henkel (MPIfR, Bonn) NH3 Ratio of strong to weak scale

2 Common Method H2 in Quasars Compare frequencies of vibrational and
rotational molecular transitions H2 in Quasars (Vibro-Rotational Absorption Lines)

3 Extragalactic Ammonia (NH3)
First polyatomic molecule detected in interstellar space (1968) • Large number of transitions within a limited frequency range (inversion lines) • Wide range of excitation conditions • Widespread spatial distribution • Hyperfine structure allows us to directly determine optical depths • Densities and gas kinetic temperatures can be derived

4 NH3

5 NH3 NH3 (18,18) 3130 K Sgr B2 (T.L. Wilson et al. 2006)

6 NH3 ( gp/)2 TMC-1C λ  1.3 cm

7

8 B0218+357 A gravitational lens at z = 0.68466 (ze =0.944)
Look back time: 6  109 yr

9

10 PKS 1830-211: Lens at z = 0.88582 HI absorption also at z = 0.19
Frye, Welch, Broadhurst 1997, ApJ 478, L25 Lens at z = HI absorption also at z = 0.19 (zblazar = 2.507) Dim r ~ 0.5” Einstein ring

11 NH3 (1,1) + (2,2) J. Braatz 23 K / 64 K z =

12 NH3 (3,3) 123 K z =

13 NH3 (4,4) 199 K z =

14 NH3 (5,5) 294 K z =

15 NH3 (6,6) 406 K z =

16 NH3 (7,7) 535 K z =

17 NH3 (8,8) 683 K z =

18 NH3 (9,9) 848 K z =

19 NH3 (10,10) 1031 K z =

20  = mp/me 3.46  (Δ/) = (zinv – zrot) / (1 + z) = ΔV/c
12CO  = mp/me NH3 inversion versus rotational lines: 3.46  (Δ/) = (zinv – zrot) / (1 + z) = ΔV/c (Early discussions with J. Chengalur in Epping) (Flambaum & Kozlov 2007, Phys. Rev. Let. 95, ) 13CO

21 B Complementary rotational lines Multicomponent analysis

22 (Δ/Δt)/ < 4.5  10 -16 yr-1 (3σ limit)
B Δ/ < 2.7  (3σ limit) (Δ/Δt)/ <  yr (3σ limit) (Murphy, Flambaum, S. Muller et al. 2008, Sci 320, 1611) Strength: A very thorough analysis Caveats: Few NH3 and few rotational lines (chemistry?) Different frequencies (cm versus mm-waves) Optically thin versus optically thick lines

23 PKS1830-211 Redshifted frequencies between 12.56 and 15.17 GHz
Background continuum between 6.5 and 8 Jy NH3

24 PKS1830-211 NH3 τapparent: 0.0008 – 0.03 (NH3)
10.22.0 8.80.7 τapparent: – 0.03 (NH3) 0.35 for prominent (mm-wave lines) (Wiklind & Combes 1996, 1998) and with 0.1 at dm-wavelengths (Chengalur et al. 1999). 8.50.6 10.90.4 8.10.2, 8.50.6 8.20.3, 8.70.5 8.40.2, 9.10.7 8.60.1 7.40.2, 10.50.4 NH3 9.00.1, 8.60.5

25 NH3

26 NH3

27 APEX PKS1830-211 Δ/  5.7  10-6 (3σ limit)
Ground rotational transition of NH3 Menten et al. 2008, A&A 492, 725 Δ/  5.7  10-6 (3σ limit) APEX Strength: One molecule Caveats: 15 GHz versus 300 GHz One rotational line Limited S/N ratio

28 Effelsberg PKS1830−211 Rotational spectra of other molecules at nearby
frequencies HC3N SO J = 1−0 SO J = 2−1 C34S J = 1−0 H13CO+ J = 1−0 H13CN J = 1−0 HN13C J = 1−0 Effelsberg

29 3.8 K < TCMB < 7.2 K Unweighted Mean: (5.65  0.81) K
[TCMB = 2.73 (1 + z)] Expected value: 5.14 K SiO (6.8  0.3) K C34S (7.2  0.4) K H13CO (3.8  0.3) K H13CN (4.8  0.5) K Unweighted Mean: (5.65  0.81) K

30 NH Other Species

31 <V>NH =  km/s <V>HC3N =  km/s <V>others =  km/s <V>NH3,low =  km/s <V>NH3,high =  km/s NH3 + HC3N: Δ/ < 1.4  (3σ, NH3, HC3N) Also including the other lines Δ/ < 1.0  10-6

32 Strength: Many molecular lines of both kinds
Similar frequencies Optical depths << 1 No apparent velocity shift with excitation Small time interval between the measurements Caveats: The excitation of the inversion lines is higher than those of the rotational lines A thorough multicomponent analysis is still missing

33 Δ/ < 3.0  (z = 2−3)

34 Δ/ < 3.0  (z = 2−3) Δ/ < 1.0  (z = 0.89)

35 Δ/ < 3.0  (z = 2−3) Δ/ < 1.0  (z = 0.89) Δ/  1.0  (z = 0.00)

36 NH3 TMC-1C λ  1.3 cm

37 HC3N J=21 TMC-1C λ  1.3 cm

38 Preliminary Results: 10 m/s Δ/  4 10-8 !!!
Molaro, Levshakov & Kozlov (astro-ph/ ) Levshakov, Molaro, & Kozlov (astro-ph/ ) NH3, C2H, HC3N, N2H+: 35 – 53 m/s !!! Δ/  !!! Accuracy to be achieved: Δ/  !!! 10 m/s

39

40 Chameleon Fields Quintessential Field varying in time and space?
Coupling with matter could change fundamental quantities locally.

41 Thank You!


Download ppt "Strong Limits on a Variable Proton to Electron Mass Ratio ()"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google