1. Impact of Maze and Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery on Clinical Outcomes 
James W.W. Wong, MD, Koon-Hou Mak, MD, FACC 
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
DOI: /j.athoracsur
Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
(A) Postoperative sinus rhythm conversion or freedom from atrial fibrillation rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the seven matched-controlled studies. (yr = year.) (B) Comparison of sinus rhythm conversion and freedom from atrial fibrillation between the concomitant maze and control groups in the seven matched-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
(A) Postoperative sinus rhythm conversion or freedom from atrial fibrillation rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the four randomized-controlled studies. (yr = year.) (B) Comparison of sinus rhythm conversion and freedom from atrial fibrillation between the concomitant maze and control groups in the four randomized-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
(A) Postoperative freedom from stroke or embolism rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the seven matched-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of stroke and embolism rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the seven matched-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
(A) Postoperative freedom from stroke and embolism rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the four randomized-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of stroke and embolism rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the four randomized-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

6. Fig 5
(A) Postoperative long-term survival rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the seven matched-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of long-term survival rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the seven matched-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

7. Fig 6
(A) Postoperative long-term survival rates in the concomitant maze group (solid bars) versus control group (open bars) in the four randomized-controlled studies. (ns = not significant; yr = year.) (B) Comparison of long-term survival rates between the concomitant maze and control groups in the four randomized-controlled studies. (CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur )
Copyright © 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions