1. CSEPs SPA Rejections December 2007 update

2. Level of reporting Rejections are reported at line level
This can inflate the rejection figures:
If a file is resubmitted weekly without the error being corrected, each month could contain up to five rejections for one item
CSP01 rejections could be incurred for one project but multiple shippers, further increasing the reported figures

3. CSEPs SPA rejections – December 07

4. CSP01 – CSEP does not exist
Resolution: xoserve manually process rejections to enable resubmitted updates to accept
Current position: reduced from peak but still high

5. CSP01 – project level
Number of projects received each month resulting in CSP01s:

6. Age of CSP01 rejections
1,786 CSP01 rejections in December – earliest rejection on database
35% have been rejecting since June

7. LMP03 – LMN is not live
Resolution: IGTs should not send updates for non live LMNs
Current position: was reducing, spike in December

8. LMP01 – EUC incorrect for LMN
Resolution: IGTs should send updates using the EUC held by xoserve
Current position: large increase May, peak in June, some reduction since

9. AQ03 – No change to supply point count or AQ
Resolution: IGTs should not send updates that do not change SPA data
Large peak in October (AQ review?), great improvement in November, maintained into December

10. AQ04 – Max CSEP AQ exceeded
Resolution: xoserve will process rejections to enable updates to accept, where AQs have been increased with DNs
Resolution: IGTs examine whether updates are valid (duplicate LMNs?)
Current position: low volumes attributed to system issue; validation corrected October hence increase to previous levels

11. AQ04 – project level

12. LMP06 – A live or pending meter is present
Resolution: IGTs should not submit new domestic sites where an LMN already exists for project/shipper combination
Current position: volumes vary each month, significant increase in November