Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 1413-1416 (November 2012)
The Genetic Dissection of a Short-Term Response to Low CO2 Supports the Possibility for Peroxide-Mediated Decarboxylation of Photorespiratory Intermediates in the Peroxisome  Olivier Keech, Wenxu Zhou, Ricarda Fenske, Catherine Colas-des-Francs-Small, John D. Bussell, Murray R. Badger, Steven M. Smith  Molecular Plant  Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012) DOI: /mp/sss104 Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 Peroxisomal Decarboxylation Reactions During Photorespiration (A) Possible pathways leading to reduction and/or decarboxylation of hydroxypyruvate. Unbroken lines represent known and confirmed reactions whereas dashed lines represent suggested alternative pathways. 1: glycolate oxidase, 2: catalase, 3: glutamate:glyoxylate aminotransferase, 4: serine:glyoxylate aminotransferase, 5: peroxisomal hydroxypyruvate reductase, 6: peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase, 7: cytosolic hydroxypyruvate reductase. (B) Relative abundance of photorespiratory intermediates for mutants under ambient air and short exposure to low CO2. White bars = ambient air (380 ppm), black bars = low CO2 (100 ppm). Results are mean ± SD of three biological replicates (and at least four technical replicates for each). Each genotype was compared to WT by Student’s t-test (significance level: * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; and *** < 0.001).(C) Representative integration of the CO2 release after switching the light off.(D) CO2 compensation point, (E) post-illumination burst, and (F) maximum rate of CO2 release for WT and photorespiratory mutants. Results are mean ± SD of three biological replicates (two technical replicates for each). All genotypes were compared to WT by Student’s t-test (significance level: * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; and *** < 0.001). (+) hpr1 cat2-2 was significantly different from hpr1 (significance level: + < 0.01). Molecular Plant 2012 5, DOI: ( /mp/sss104) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google