Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DRUG DESIGN: OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "DRUG DESIGN: OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS"— Presentation transcript:

1 DRUG DESIGN: OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS
Patrick An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 3/e Chapter 10 DRUG DESIGN: OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS Part 4: Section

2 Contents Part 4: Section 4.8. Simplification - Rationale - Methods (9 slides) - Example (2 slides) - Disadvantages (14 slides) - Example of oversimplification (8 slides) [36 slides]

3 4.8 Simplification Rationale :
Lead compounds from natural sources are often complex and difficult to synthesise Simplifying the molecule makes synthesis of analogues easier, quicker and cheaper Simpler structures may fit binding site easier and increase activity Simpler structures may be more selective and less toxic if excess functional groups removed

4 4.8 Simplification Methods: Retain pharmacophore
Remove unnecessary functional groups

5 4.8 Simplification Methods: Example Remove excess rings
Excess functional groups Excess ring

6 4.8 Simplification Methods: Remove asymmetric centres

7 4.8 Simplification Methods:
Simplify in stages to avoid oversimplification Pharmacophore Simplification does not mean ‘pruning groups’ off the lead compound Compounds usually made by total synthesis

8 INT104

9 INT104

10 INT104

11 INT104

12 INT104

13 4.8 Simplification Example Important binding groups retained
Pharmacophore Important binding groups retained Unnecessary ester removed Complex ring system removed

14 4.8 Simplification Example Devazepide Asperlicin - CCK antagonist
Excess rings removed Asperlicin - CCK antagonist Possible lead for treating panic attacks

15 4.8 Simplification Disadvantages:
Oversimplification may result in decreased activity and selectivity Simpler molecules have more conformations More likely to interact with more than one target binding site.

16 INT115 Target binding site

17 INT116 Target binding site

18 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

19 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

20 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

21 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

22 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

23 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

24 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

25 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

26 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

27 Rotatable bonds INT116 Target binding site

28 Rotatable bonds INT117 Target binding site

29 Rotatable bonds INT118 Different binding site - side effects

30 Example of oversimplification
Simplification of opiates

31 MORPHINE C C O C C C C MOR062.WAV N SIMPLIFICATION

32 LEVORPHANOL C C O C C C C MOR064.WAV N SIMPLIFICATION

33 LEVORPHANOL C C O C C C C MOR064.WAV N SIMPLIFICATION

34 METAZOCINE C C O C C C C MOR065.WAV N SIMPLIFICATION

35 C C O C C C C MOR065.WAV N OVERSIMPLIFICATION

36 TYRAMINE C C O C C C C MOR065.WAV N OVERSIMPLIFICATION

37 AMPHETAMINE C C O C C C C MOR065.WAV N OVERSIMPLIFICATION


Download ppt "DRUG DESIGN: OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google