Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Review of REACH – follow-up

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Review of REACH – follow-up"— Presentation transcript:

1 Review of REACH – follow-up
CARACAL # 13 27 Novemer 2013 Michal Kubicki DG Enterprise and Industry Unit F.1 : REACH

2 Overview of the presentation
Public debate on the Review Actions initiated by the Commission Follow-up Reporting

3 Input from the European Parliament
ENVI Committee meeting on 29 May 2013 Well received the general conclusions Demanded improved quality, and higher pace in the implementation of restrictions and authorizations Recognized concerns for SMEs and demanded concrete actions EP Intergroup on climate change, biodiversity and sustainable development meeting on 4 June 2013 chaired by MEP Pavel Poc Speakers from COM, Industry and NGO stakeholders Numerous voices asked for COM activities to promote REACH internationally (world-wide REACH) 3 3

4 Commission workshops 27 June – Review follow-up Technical Workshop
204 registered participants 2 Commissioners 3 Sessions on DQ, SME, DU 15 speakers 4 invited SMEs 10-11 Dec. - SME and Registration workshop 4 4

5 Position Papers AmCham CEFIC EEB EEF IndustriALL Orgalime UEAPME WKO 5

6 Position Papers - Industry
Mentioned numerous activities aiming at improving the quality of dossiers (sharing best practices, implementation workshops, CEFIC guidance) Mentions that significant void has been filled since 2010 by clearer definitions of strictly controlled conditions, nanomaterials, and acceptable use of read accross. Asks for positive feedback from ECHA to signal good practice Asks for protection of single market against national measures Asks for more coherence with sector specific legislation (RoHS2, Waste, EID, etc.) 6 6

7 Position Papers - NGOs Question granting registration numbers to poor quality dossiers and QOBL approach to improve dossier quality Question independence of ECHA Ask for more access to information from ECHA Ask for more precautionary principle in restrictions Ask for more practical (and up to date) information in SDS, especially to use at workspace, and including information on nanoforms and Support the Roadmap approach Ask for support to SMEs to cope with requirements (rather than easing them) 7 7

8 Position Papers – voice of SME
Asks for careful ex-ante assessment and ex-post monitoring of economic impacts of REACH on SMEs. Asks for no „regulatory experiments“, legal changes must be reduced to an absolute minimum until 2020. Asks for a European strategy to support and inform SMEs with sufficient resources for its implementation. Asks for SIEF arbitrage system Asks for ECHA focus on SMEs – resources and communication (website, guidance) Asks for a revision of annexes with most burdensome obligation after the final registration deadline 8 8

9 Commission Actions Meeting general objectives
Promote REACH internationally in bilateral talks. Study to analyze feasible approximation tools at international level Review of registration requirements for 1-10 tonnes – CfT launched Minimazing overlaps by dialogue with other services – workshop on 8 November. Registration Costs and SMEs Fee Regulation Workshop on Dec Art.117 report templates will be updated to cover also SME support actions CfT to further monitor impacts on competitiveness, innovation and SMEs launched. Dossier Quality Study for identification of sameness Nanomaterials IA ongoing Supply chain communication EEN used to raise awareness among DU Infringement procedures have been launched for 6 MS. Use of Animals Active role of COM – in particular of JRC Research framework (Horizon 2020, National, JRC) 9 9

10 Commission Actions RMO: Enforcement
Study to develop analytical tools to facilitate dossier development by MS COM will use 'common understanding papers' to improve interfaces with sector specific legislations. SVHC Roadmap on schedule to be adopted In collaboration with SANCO, substances to be restricted under art. 69(1) will be identified and prioritized. COM commissioned a study on the implementation of art. 68(2) for CMRs in consumer articles. Enforcement The Commission has launched an external study to develop enforcement indicators FORUM has been engaged to increase cooperation with customs authorities. 10 10

11 Follow-up Reporting COM to distribute reporting template based on Review Recommendadions in December addressed to MS, ECHA and industry. Contributions will be gathered to come forward with an overview report (in the form of a CARACAL paper). 11 11

12 Thank you For further information please visit: Michal Kubicki
ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach echa.europa.eu Michal Kubicki DG Enterprise and Industry Unit F.1 : REACH This presentation does not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission.


Download ppt "Review of REACH – follow-up"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google