1. Assisted Migration as a Response to Climate Change: Should we be doing this with plants, and if so how and under what constraints. Robert Popp, Robert Zaino, VT. Dept of Fish & Wildlife Nancy Patch, Lisa Thornton, and Sandy Wilmot, VT. Dept of Forest, Parks & Recreation
Pinterest.com

2. Projected climate migrations for several states/regions in the Northeast based on summer heat index. Climate Impacts Assessments Oct 2006

3. Justification for Assisted Migration
Species Rescue: to prevent extinction by moving species beyond their historic range.
Maintain Genetic Diversity: moving selected populations within the current or historic range
Maintaining Commercially Important Species: Increase the abundance of “climate change winners” &/or extending their range.
Preserve Ecosystem Function: may involve moving a suite of species.

4. Risks of Assisted Migration
Potential Invasiveness: species could become weedy or outcompete native species, i.e. red squirrel in NF
Genetic: could result in hybridization between related but previously separated species.
Introduction of Pathogens or Pests:
Uncertainty of Future Conditions: Attempting to predetermine the composition of future plant communities
Diversion of Resources: no guarantee of success since based largely on guesswork to predict future climate
Treating the Symptom: not addressing causes of climate change and may provide false hope

5. Natural Migration Rate: Average for most trees = 50 km/century
(b) The gray shading indicates a suitable deployment area for white pine seeds in the absence of climate change. (c) The gray shading indicates a projected deployment area for the 2041–2070 time period based on the Canadian General Circulation Model
Natural Migration Rate: Average for most trees = 50 km/century
Migration Rate needed to keep up with projected Climate Change = 300 km/50yrs

6. Existing Policies British Columbia:
Allow movement of Doug fir & other spp 200 m. up in elevation & one seed zone farther north.
Allow planting of western larch beyond current range; up to 10% of seeds.
Alberta:
Allow movement up to 200 m. in elevation and 2⁰ of latitude north.
Quebec:
Allow planting of more southern species as part of a mix with local species.
Oregon:
Climate change should be a consideration in forest management plans to address the change in species composition, refugia, and T&E species.

7. Vermont Guidelines Tier 1: No AM; self adaptation.
S1, S2 Natural Communities, Old Forest, Connected Blocks
Tier 2: Moving plants or seed within current range, using local sources, and maintaining the current natural community.
Tier 3: Moving plants or seed within current range, using local sources, but changing the natural community, i.e. planting maple in black ash swamps
Tier 4: Moving plants or seed into new areas, using local sources, that expand the edge of range.
Tier 5: Moving plants or seed into new areas from long-distance species relocation.
Requires review by Heritage Program, Stewardship Team, and the appropriate Scientific Advisory Group

8. Tiered Options for Assisted Migration
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
Description
No assisted migration, self- adaptation
Moving plants or seed within current range using local sources and within current natural community
Moving plants or seed within current range using local sources but altering natural community
Moving plants or seed into new areas using local sources that expand the edge of range
Long-distance species relocation by moving plants or seed into new areas
Selection Criteria
For con- nected landscapes that allow species to move as a self-adapta- tion strategy
To maintain S1 and S2 natural communities as self- adaptable
To increase abundance of species expected to do well with climate change
To repopulate sites with climate adaptable species
In anticipation of declines due to climate change or pests.
Includes plantings of species that are expected to be adapted to climate change and also plantings in developed areas.
Rescuing southern species by moving to VT
GMO plants, if considered, would be included in this tier.
Not recom- mended at this time. Would require rigorous scrutiny.

9. New England Plant Conservation Program (NEPCoP) Policy on Species Rescue
Managed relocation is a tool that should be considered part of overall strategies to conserve plants in the region, and its use should be guided by the best science available.
2. New England endemic (or near-endemic) taxa in habitats that are considered vulnerable to climate change should be researched as potential targets for managed relocation.
3. NEPCoP should be aware of species in the southern or Mid-Atlantic region that are being considered for managed relocation to New England, i.e. we’re more likely to be recipients rather than donors.