Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA"— Presentation transcript:

1 Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA 2014-3-27
Long-term monitoring of FY-2 and FY-3 IR calibration using GSICS products Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA

2 Outline Current Status IR Bias monitoring of FY-2 VISSR IR Bias monitoring and correction of FY-3A&B MERSI and VIRR GSICS support to On-orbit test of FY-3C Future Prospects

3 Current Status of CMA GSICS Products
Mon Ref Graphic Products## Collocation & Correction Products** FY2D&E&F/ VISSR Metop-A/IASI (Op.) AQUA/AIRS (Op.) NPP/CrIS (Developing) Ocean buoy RTM (Plan) Daily Regression (RAD~RAD and TBB~TBB) Monthly Scatter of TBB Bias Time Sequence of TBB Bias Collocation Samples Intercalibration Coefficients NRTC and RAC in txt (Plan to generate the GSICS standard format) FY3A&B&C/MERSI &VIRR NPP/CrIS (Demo) Monthly Regression (RAD~RAD and TBB~TBB) AQUA&TERRA MODIS (Demo) NPP/VIIRS (Demo) GOME (Developing) Monthly Regression (REF~REF) Monthly Scatter of REF Bias Time Sequence of REF Bias Projected Image NRTC and RAC Stable Targets Tracking (Developing) Time Sequence of Response Degradation Rates TEB RSB ## : see ** : Only Internal Shared currently.

4 IR Calibration Bias of FY-2 VISSR
FY-2 vs IASI+AIRS Significant progresses were made in FY-2 operational calibration (Changed to GSICS in 2012) Eclipse Phase GSICS Operational calibration of FY-2D/2E was upgraded using GSICS inter-calibration algorithm in and separately. The calibration biases were sharply decreased, and reduced to about eclipse period. GSICS Time series of TBB biases for IR1~3 channels vs AQUA/AIRS reference scenes (290 K for IR1 and IR2, 250 K for IR3).

5 IR Calibration Bias of FY-2 VISSR
GSICS CIBLE 2012 2013 Significant progresses were made in FY-2 operational calibration (Changed to CIBLE in 2013) IR biases of the New operational calibration : Seasonal variation: FY-2D biases, IR1 ( 1~2K), IR2 ( 2~3K), IR3(0.5~1K);FY-2E biases , IR1 (-1~-0.5K), IR2 ( 1~2K), IR3(-3~-2K);FY-2F biases , IR1 ( 1~2K), IR2 ( 2~3K), IR3(0.5~1K); Inconsistent and systematic bias between IR bands [(VISSR-IASI) _IR1- (VISSR-IASI) _IR2] Time series of TBB biases for IR1~3 channels vs IASI and AIRS reference scenes K for IR1 and 250 K for IR3). Op. Cal Upgrade date:FY2D ; FY-2E CIBLE (Calibration of Inner Blackbody corrected by Lunar Emission )

6 IR Calibration Bias of FY-3
Based on LEO-LEO SNO intercalibration method, IR calibration biases of FY-3A&B VIRR and MERSI are assessed Spatial distributions of cross points FY-3B~METOP-A Temporal distributions of cross points Collocation criteria: Observation time difference < 300s Spacial Distance <1km geometry difference |cos(FY_zen)/cos(REF_zen)-1| < 5% Environment uniformity check RSTD (FY3 in ENV_BOX) < 0.005

7 IR Calibration Bias of FY-3A&B VIRR
FY-3A&B/VIRR vs METOP-A/IASI FY3A/VIRR SRF FY3A/VIRR Scene Temp-dependence and Seasonal variation FY3B/VIRR FY3B/VIRR FY-3B/VIRR Measurements are more consistent with IASI Time series of VIRR Monthly Mean Bias versus IASI BT comparison (Right) as well as their observation differences (VIRR-IASI) in Aug. 2012

8 Improvement to nonlinear correction of FY-3A VIRR
Channel 4 BT biases scatter of FY-3A/VIRR using nonlinear correction coefficients before and after improvement Channel 5 Before After Normalized PDFs of FY-3A/VIRR BT biases in different months using different nonlinear correction coefficients

9 IR Calibration Bias of FY-3A MERSI
FY3A/MERSI vs METOP-A/IASI Measurements from FY-3A/MERSI are warmer than that from IASI. Annual mean bias is 3.17 ±0.35K in 2012,which is consistent with the assessment from CRCS synchronous in situ measurements. The BT biases show seasonal variation. BT comparison (left) as well as their observation differences (VIRR-IASI) in Aug. 2012 SRF Time series of VIRR Monthly Mean Bias versus IASI

10 FY-3C On-orbit Test—IR calibration assessment
FY-3C/MERSI vs METOP-A/IASI Mean Bias 0.57±0.29K FY-3C/VIRR vs METOP-A/IASI Mean Bias CH4:-1.01±0.47K CH5:-0.95±0.38K Dec. 2013

11 FY-3C On-orbit Test—IR calibration improvement
Onboard BB Radiance is recalculated using PRT physical temperature VIRR vs IASI Channel 4 -0.47K VIRR vs MODIS -0.44K

12 FY-3C On-orbit Test—IR calibration improvement
Onboard BB Radiance is recalculated using PRT physical temperature VIRR vs IASI Channel 5 -0.40K VIRR vs MODIS -0.41K

13 FY-3C On-orbit Test—VNIR calibration coefficients
CH12 CH14 CH15 Differences between FY-3C/MERSI and TERRA/MODIS measurements due to spectral mismatches simulated using GOME-2 <2% CH12:~6%; CH14:~8%;CH15:~20%

14 FY-3C On-orbit Test—VNIR calibration coefficients
Regression between collocated FY-3C/MERSI DN and TERRA/MODIS reflectance( )

15 FY-3C On-orbit Test—VNIR calibration coefficients
Nonlinearity or inconsistency using various references StableTargets Intercalibration of FY-3C/MERSI based on various targets( ) Stable Targets: MultiSite (Dunhuang , Libya1, Libya4, Arabia2, Lanai), DCC, Moon

16 Chinese Meteorological Satellite: FengYun Series
Polar System Geostationary System FY | 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2H FY | 1A 1B 1C 1D First Generation First Generation FY | 3A 3B 3C 3D 3F Based on the current generation of polar and geostationary systems, since 1990s, we began to develop the next generation both for polar and Geo, which called FY3 in polar series, and FY4 in Geo series. FY | 4A 4B 4C 4F Second Generation Second Generation 16

17 Future Prospects — CMA GSICS Products
FY-2 FY-4 FY-3 REF IASI,CrIS,VIIRS,GOME… GEO-LEO-GEO GEO-GEO LEO-GEO LEO-GEO-LEO Inter-Platform LEO-LEO VNIR: Tracking and RayMatch using stable targets(Desert, Snow, DCC, Moon…)

18 Thanks for your attention!


Download ppt "Na XU Xiuqing HU Lin CHEN Ling SUN NSMC CMA"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google