1. Lessons Learned
WG Update
GLM, Washington May 2018 v

2. Content WG activities 2018 Lessons Learned After Action Monitoring
Purpose
Tracking table
Dashboard

3. Activities 2018 Learning from Lessons Lessons Learned Methodology
Concluded:
Ethiopia and Haiti
Strengthen:
Adding a management response
Including Quality Team from start
After-action developed and monitored
Tracking table developed
After-action monitoring system developed
Dashboard for learning and monitoring
Upcoming:
South Sudan
Bangladesh
Services implemented by partners
Impact assessment
In 2018, the WG has had 4 calls with participants from THW, ACF, Goal, UNICEF and the GLC. The focus has been to 1) establish the role of the WG, 2) agree on priorities for 2018 (Methodology strengthening, lessons for South Sudan and Bangladesh, develop/agree on tracking table and system for monitoring after-action, if time and as needed support Service WG with studies and do a test impact assessment), 3) discuss how to strengthen methodology (agreed to add a management response to each report to futher strengtening accountability and clarifying the action, which has been agreed to implement. In addition, we agreed to expand the role of the Quality team to be included from the start to increase the focus of the lessons by narrowing scope in TOR stage). Finally, it has been discussed that after-action was weekly followed up on and required a system. 4) Tracking table and dashboard to be dicussed in next slide.
THW, ACF, Goal, UNICEF + GLC
4 calls in 2018 (till May)

4. After-action monitoring - Tracking table
Purpose: to track progress and document learning and actions taken
Use:
Understand best practices,
Identify where more action needs to be done
Help track and document performance (and develop KPIs) for key functional cluster areas
Lessons and actions are shown by:
Global/local level
Country
IASC core function (including sub-category)
The responsible technical area under who’s responsibility the action lies
Status of the action
The table is being RETROACTIVELY filled
Retroactive management response will be filled before next GLM
Future: progress updated on a 3 months basis
A tracking table for the lessons, recommendations and action monitoring has been designed
It can be used to understand best practices, identify where more action needs to be done, and help develop KPIs for key functional cluster areas

5. IASC Cluster Functions
Informing strategic decision-making
Supporting service delivery
Planning and strategy development
Preparing needs assessments and analysis of gaps to inform the setting of priorities,
Identifying and finding solutions for (emerging) gaps, obstacles, duplication and cross-cutting issues
Formulating priorities on the basis of analysis
Providing a platform that ensures service delivery is driven by the Humanitarian Response Plan and strategic priorities
Developing mechanisms to eliminate duplication of service delivery
Developing sectoral plans, objectives and indicators that directly support realization of the overall response’ strategic objectives
Applying and adhering to common standards and guidelines
Clarifying funding needs, helping to set priorities, and agreeing cluster contributions to the HC’s humanitarian funding proposals
Monitoring and reporting on performance
Preparedness
Advocacy
Monitoring and reporting on activities and needs,
Measuring progress against the cluster strategy and agreed results
Recommending corrective action where necessary
Contingency planning/preparedness for recurrent disasters whenever feasible and relevant,
Building national and local actors’ capacity
Identifying concerns, and contributing key information and messages to HC and HCT messaging and action,
Undertaking advocacy on behalf of the cluster, cluster members, and affected people

6. DASHBOARD LINK TO DASHBOARD – RANDOM INFORMATION

7. Tracking table (1)

8. Tracking table (2)

9. Tracking table (3)