Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Yin-Shu Chang, MD, Jia-Xiang Wang, MD, PhD, Da-Wei Chang, PhD 

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Yin-Shu Chang, MD, Jia-Xiang Wang, MD, PhD, Da-Wei Chang, PhD "— Presentation transcript:

1 Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass and Stents for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Stenosis 
Yin-Shu Chang, MD, Jia-Xiang Wang, MD, PhD, Da-Wei Chang, PhD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017) DOI: /j.athoracsur Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Flow diagram of the review process according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. (RCT = randomized controlled trial.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3 Fig 2 Forest plot of the risk ratio of short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. The solid squares indicate the mean difference and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond indicates the weighted mean difference, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CI). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CI. (MACCE = major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; M-H = Mantel-Haenszel test; MI = myocardial infarction; TVR = target vessel revascularization.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4 Fig 3 Forest plot of the risk ratio of medium-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. The solid squares indicate the mean difference and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond indicates the weighted mean difference, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CI). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CI. (MACCE = major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; M-H = Mantel-Haenszel test; MI = myocardial infarction; TVR = target vessel revascularization.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

5 Fig 4 Forest plot of the risk ratio of long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. The solid squares indicate the mean difference and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The solid vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond indicates the weighted mean difference, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CI). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CI. (MACCE = major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; M-H = Mantel-Haenszel test; MI = myocardial infarction; TVR = target vessel revascularization.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Yin-Shu Chang, MD, Jia-Xiang Wang, MD, PhD, Da-Wei Chang, PhD "

Similar presentations


Ads by Google