1. 13. Transfer operations 1: system and classification
Translation Studies
13. Transfer operations 1: system and classification
Krisztina Károly, Spring, 2006
Source: Klaudy, 2003

2. 1. The system of transfer operations (TO)

3. The concept of TO
Translating = a highly complicated sequence of actions, including:
- the replacement of SL lexical units by TL lexical units,
- the restructuring of the sentence structure,
- the changing of the word order,
- the omission of certain elements and the addition of others, etc.

4. The concept of TO cont.
due to the differences between SL and TL lexical systems, even the seemingly simplest action  the replacement of SL lexical units by TL lexical units  can become a complicated task
Klaudy (2003) calls these choices/operations (e.g., replacement, transposition, omission, addition) “transfer operations” (= átváltási műveletek)  refers to ALL the moves from SL to TL, not only problematic cases

5. The history of the term
Vinay and Darbelnet (1958, 1995)  "methods" or "procedures" of translation, including:
borrowing,
calque,
literal translation,
transposition,
modulation,
equivalence, and
adaptation
They use the word "transfer" as a generic term for methods of translation

6. The history of the term cont.
Catford (1965)  "operation":
"Translation is an operation performed on languages" … "...a process of substituting a text in one language for a text in another"  Catford's interest is in translation as a phenomenon (not in operations carried out by translators)
Catford (1964)  "shifts”
Nida (1964)  "techniques of adjustment" as a term to refer to additions, subtractions and alterations
Newmark (1982)  “techniques”, “method” and “procedures”

7. Translation as a decision-making process: a case study
The first sentence of Graham Greene’s short story The Innocent was translated by Gabriella Prekop in the following way:
English ST: It was a mistake to take Lola here. (Greene 451)
Hungarian TT: Hiba volt, hogy magammal vittem Lolát. (Prekop 278) (lit: It was a mistake to take Lola with me.)

8. Inventory of all of the operations
mere replacement of the English lexical units with Hungarian ones produces a grammatically ill-formed sentence
(cf. Az volt egy hiba vinni Lola ide.)

9. Inventory cont.
To get a grammatically well-formed Hungarian sentence, she had to perform a series of operations:
(1) she left out the English personal pronoun it,
(2) the past tense of the English existential verb (was) was replaced by the past form of the Hungarian existential verb (volt),
(3) she left out the English article a,

10. Inventory cont.
(4) the English noun mistake was replaced by the Hungarian noun hiba,
(5) the English Verb-Noun word order was changed to the Hungarian Noun-Verb word order,
(6) the conjunction hogy (‘that’) was inserted in the Hungarian sentence,
(7) the declined personal pronoun magammal (‘with me’) was inserted in the Hungarian sentence,
(8) the English verb take was replaced by the Hungarian verb vinni,

11. Inventory cont.
(9) the English infinitive (to take) was replaced by the Hungarian conjugated verb form (vittem, ‘ I took’),
(10)she left out to,
(11) she added the past tense, first person singular inflection to the Hungarian verb vinni,
(12) she added the transitive inflection to the proper name Lola (Lolát),
(13) she left out the adverb here.

12. In sum = 13 operations: four omissions (it, a, to, here),
two additions (hogy, magammal),
one change of word order (was mistake  Hiba volt),
three lexical substitutions (was  volt, mistake  hiba, take  vinni),
one grammatical replacement (to takevittem),
two structural changes (mistake to take  hogy vittem, Lola  Lolát).

13. Inventory cont.
in reality, the translator does not work in such a linear fashion
the most complicated operation is making a complex Hungarian sentence out of a simple English sentence  the most important transfer operation triggers the rest, some of which are performed by the translator consciously and others automatically
Obligatory transfer operations: without these we do not get a grammatically well-formed Hungarian sentence  are generally performed automatically
E.g., the omission of it or the addition of the transitive inflection to the proper name Lola

14. 2. The classification of transfer operations

15. Obligatory and optional transfer operations
Obligatory transfer operations = those performed by translators due to the differences between the lexical and grammatical systems of the two Ls (without them the translator would produce semantically or grammatically ill-formed sentences)
Optional transfer operations are those performed over and above obligatory transfer operations.

16. Automatic and non-automatic transfer operations
Automatic transfer operations = those that are (or should be) obligatorily performed by translators as a result of differences between the systems of the two Ls
(e.g., from English into Hungarian, translators automatically omit English prepositions and insert Hungarian inflections and postpositions, change word order)
distinguishing automatic transfer operations from the rest is important because if they are always automatically performed their teaching may be unnecessary in translator training

17. Classification according to level of operation
word-level transfer operations = the replacement of SL lexical units with TL lexical units
phrase-level transfer operations = e.g., changing the word order within adjectival phrases
sentence-level transfer operations = e.g., changing the passive in English into an active structure in the Hungarian translation
discourse-level transfer operations = e.g., the unification of subjects, within the paragraph

18. Classification according to the scope and cause of the operation

19. Lexical transfer operations:
(1) differentiation and specification
(2) generalisation
(3) conceptual expansion (e.g., the replacement of a word denoting the cause of a process in the SL with a word that denotes its consequence in the TL),
(4) antonymous translation
(5) total transformation (the replacement of a SL word with a TL word that carries a completely different meaning)
(6) compensation (rendering the meaning of a SL word at a different place, using different means) (Retsker, 1974)

20. Grammatical transfer operations:
(1) replacements,
(2) transpositions,
(3) insertions,
(4) omissions (Vaseva 1980).

21. Stylistic transfer operations
are necessitated by the requirements of the genre or text type
(e.g., the choice between the various forms of expressing impersonality in Hungarian: e.g., first and third person plural verb form, infinitive)

22. Pragmatic transfer operations
are necessitated by the requirements of the TL culture
(e.g., use of the diminutive suffix in Hungarian sounds childish and simple-minded, but not in Russian, where it denotes closeness)

23. What can be considered a transfer operation?
broader view of transfer operations: all operations conducted by the translator in order to transform the SL text into the TL text

24. Main types and (sub-)types
(= classification according to the scope of the operation)
1. Lexical transfer operations
2. Grammatical transfer operations

25. (Sub-)types (classification acc. to manner of performance) 1
(Sub-)types (classification acc. to manner of performance) 1. Types of lexical transfer operations
1.1. Narrowing of meaning (differentiation and specification)
1.2. Broadening of meaning (generalisation)
1.3. Contraction of meanings
1.4. Distribution of meaning
1.5. Omission of meaning
1.6. Addition of meaning
1.7. Exchange of meaning
1.8. Antonymous translation
1.9. Total transformation
1.10. Compensation

26. 2. Types of grammatical transfer operations
2.1. Grammatical specification and generalisation
2.2. Grammatical division
2.3. Grammatical contraction
2.4. Grammatical omission
2.5. Grammatical addition
2.6. Grammatical transpositions
2.7. Grammatical replacements
***