Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 1004-1011 (September 2003)
The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis Philip A. Mcfarlane, Ahmed M. Bayoumi, Andreas Pierratos, Donald A. Redelmeier Kidney International Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003) DOI: /j x Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 Confidence interval ellipses (5%, 50%, and 95%) for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis and 2500 bootstrap ICER iterations. Cost-effectiveness ceiling = $50,000. Kidney International , DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Net monetary benefit (NMB) individual patient dispersion with λ = $100,000. Abbreviations are: IHD, in-center hemodialysis; HNHD, home nocturnal hemodialysis. Kidney International , DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3 Acceptability curve for home nocturnal hemodialysis.
Kidney International , DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.