Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1st Annual EPLI Trainer Day

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1st Annual EPLI Trainer Day"— Presentation transcript:

1 1st Annual EPLI Trainer Day
March 19, 2018

2 Find START on Social Media
Instagram: startpeertopeer Hashtag: #STARTProject Facebook “Like” our page (Statewide Autism Resources and Training (START))

3

4 Training Resources Coaching Tool Kit Audio Notes

5 Today’s Agenda & Goals ENGAGEMENT CONTENT LRE (Inclusion) Research
Behavior Scripts (1h – 11a) Peer to Peer Curriculum (30m – 11:30a) LUNCH (45m – 12:15p) Caseload Analysis (30m – 1:45p) Literacy (30m – 1:15p) BREAK (15m - 1:30) Differential Eligibility (15m – 1:45) Changes to the AS Module (15m – 2:00 Students with Complex Needs (15m – 2:15p) Wrap Up (15m – 2:30p) CONTENT

6 “Inclusion Confusion”
Geography is a necessary but insufficient variable for providing an inclusive education. Content of Instruction Instructional Strategies Intensity of Instruction Opportunity to Respond Culture of Belonging Environmental Supports Quirk, C., Ryndak, D.L., Taub, D. (2017) Research and Evidence-based Practices to Promote Membership and Learning in General Education for Students with Extensive Support Needs. Inclusion, 5 (2),

7

8 Clarifying Vocabulary
Exclusion: Denied Access Segregation: Separate Environment Integration: Adjust to Standard Environment Inclusion: Equitable Opportunities Adapted from A Summary of the Evidence on Inclusive Education (2016). Alana

9 Inclusion as an Equitable Education
Equal Opportunity Full membership in the social and learning contexts Intentional development of supports to address learning, social, and behavioral needs to ensure access and progress in the general education curriculum and in pivotal (engagement / independence) & functional / adaptive skills and IEP goals.

10 Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports for Students with ASD Module Training Guide; AY Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Intensive Supports Targeted Supports Level of individualization Key Concepts: Review the 3-tiered model of PBIS. Discuss how the model represents levels of intervention not type of students. Discuss how the core PBIS strategies should impact the largest number of students in order to reduce the number of students in tiers 2 and 3. Because of the resources needed to support students at tiers 2 and 3. Considerations: Application: Universal Supports for Students with Dx Core Curriculum & Instructional & Behavioral Strategies Autism Education Center; Grand Valley State University ©2010 All Rights Reserved

11 Current Theme in Inclusive Education Outcome Research
Students with Extensive Support Needs Intellectual Disabilities Autism Spectrum Disorder Multiple Disabilities

12 The Dynamic Relationship Between Content, Curriculum and Student Learning: Three Primary Findings
The amount, type, and quality of interactions between students with extensive support needs and their typical peers were better in general education contexts. Services in general education contexts could be superior to those in self-contained settings with respect to: The quality of student Individualized Education Programs, the aspects of instruction and the overall program provided The amount of time that teachers provided instruction The amount of time students were engaged in instruction and social interactions with general education classmates When these student received services in inclusive general education contexts, their learning outcomes could be better across skills areas and activities including: Social competence Language Development and Use General education content areas The Dynamic Relationship Between Context, Curriculum, and Student Learning: A Case for Inclusive Education as a Research-based Practice. Jackson, Ryndak, & Wehmeyer, (2010).

13 Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities
“There is clear and convincing evidence that inclusive educational settings can confer substantial short and long-term benefits to students with and without disabilities.” Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities Increased academic achievement & graduation Increased independence Increased engagement Increased attendance Increased communication skills Increased social competence & quality of relationships Decreased behavior / disciplinary referrals Same level of teacher attention Neutral or Positive Effects Academic Achievement Social Competence Additional Benefits: Reduced fear of human differences Increase friendly relationship Less prejudice Less patronizing / pitying behavior Quirk, C., Ryndak, D.L., Taub, D. (2017) Research and Evidence-based Practices to Promote Membership and Learning in General Education for Students with Extensive Support Needs. Inclusion, 5 (2),

14 Kurth & Mastergeorge, 2010 15 Ss w/ ASD (not AS) – 12 males
7-9th grade; years old 7 >80% day in gen ed (reading & math instruction in gen ed) 8 self-contained >50% (reading & math instruction in sped) Measures: Cognitive GE mean 64.9; SC mean 60.0 Adaptive GE mean 44.4; SC mean 42.3 Academic Reading GE mean 67.6; SC mean 13.1 Writing GE mean 83.6; SC mean 14.1 Math GE mean 77.4; SC mean 8.5 Kurth & Mastergeorge (2010). Academic and Cognitive Profiles of Students with Autism: Implications for Classroom Practice and Placement. International Journal of Special Education, 25 (2), 8-14

15 There is STRONG Evidence that Student with “Extensive Support Needs”
Acquire skills and content knowledge in general education with rigorous instruction and UDL-based adaptations (e.g. differentiated instruction; universal and environmental supports, peer supports) Are BEST served by educational teams that approach their education with the intent of finding solutions to general education access and learning barriers rather than alternative placements. Involvement and Progress in the General Education Curriculum for Students With Extensive Support Needs: K-12 Inclusive-Education Research and Implications for the Future. Ryndak, Lewis & White, (2013).

16 Rationale for Segregated Programming Simply Not Supported
7 years; 6 self-contained; 5 districts; 3 states Rationale: Community (i.e. more protective environment) Not purposefully created or given much attention Evidence that it, in fact, was the opposite Less Distractions: SC more frequent; more severe Curriculum and Instruction: (structure; individualized) Less structure than gen ed Context-Free / Meaningless Curriculum (i.e. little inquire-based / cooperative learning; often “seat work;” no connection to gen ed) No Specially Trained Instructor – mostly parapros Behavior Supports: Confrontational staff; Few attempts to understand or respond to function; Contingent removal; Use of time out / restraints Does Self-Contained Special Education Deliver on Its Promises? A Critical Inquiry Into Research and Practice. Causton-Theoharis, Theoharis, Orsati, Cosier, (2011)

17 Inclusive Education Barriers HUMAN NATURE
Protection (Students with and without Disabilities and Learning Environment) Perceived need for resources Assumptions & Misconceptions Student Ability Benefits (i.e. wasting valuable instructional time) Functional Skills

18 Activities with a Purpose http://www. thinkingcollaborative
Increase engagement (mixing up tables Focus on processing content Includes fluency building (scripts) ALL participate Enlarge idea generation Name it

19 You get a question from a special education teacher:
The 30 Second Speech You get a question from a special education teacher: “How am I guaranteed that when I send my students to gen ed, they are receiving an appropriate / better education? What about functional skills?” Develop a 30 second response (1m) Pair/share with person NOT at your table (limit discussion) then return to your table (3m) Starting with last person to return to your table, each shares PARTNER’s response in clockwise manner (3m) Select best response at your table to report out (1m)

20 Report Out 3-2-1

21 Behavior Scripts Behavioral Skills Training
Practice with Feedback Observation Assessment Rationale Detailed Script ICF (Implemented Consistently with Fidelity) IBI (Implemented but Inconsistently and/or without Fidelity) NI (Not Implemented) NO (No Opportunity for Implementation)

22 Behavior Scripts The Basic Structure
Engagement Disengagement Schedule / Break

23 Doing what peers are doing and what the teacher expects them to be doing.

24 Engagement Script: Teaching to be a Student
During large group instruction: Have peer(s) or additional adult translate gen ed teacher’s instructions (step by step), expectations, core discussion points, answers peers are providing, etc. on a white board, post it, paper, etc. This will help keep <student> oriented to key information in the environment. If the teacher is asking for peers to respond, visually prompt <student> to “raise your hand” and wait for the teacher to call on him/her. Write down the correct answer (on a post it, white board, etc.) so <student> doesn’t have to generate a correct answer (even if you know he/she knows the answer). Once the teacher calls on <student>, visually prompt <student> to read the answer out loud and then provide a high 5 or thumbs up for a “great job.” This will help <student> learn what it means to be a student and engage with the class. During small group / independent instruction: Have selected peers sit near <student> and do the expected work in order to model what <student> is expected to be doing. Visually prompt <student> to do what his/her peers are doing. Differentiate all work to a level <student> can do independently. Provide high 5’s, thumbs up, “great job” or other feedback as <student> interacts with assignments (right or wrong). Engagement is what is important, not always correctness. To ensure correctness, differentiate work to a level <student> will get the answer correct <errorless learning>.

25 Disengagement Script If <student> is not engaged, visually prompt <student> to complete a very specific task in the activity and/or differentiate the expectation to lower demand AND increase the use of the Sr script. If this is not successful, offer a choice within the activity. Examples include “you do one, I do one,” “I’ll write, you trace?” “you pick which one you want to do,” “do you want to do the first ½ or the 2nd ½” etc. Peers can be used to pair with <student> to accomplish this or another adult. If this is not successful, use the One More Script. If these 3 steps are not successful, utilize the Schedule / Break Script. If this is not successful to move <student> to re-engagement or break, use the Break Protocol.

26 Schedule / Break Script
If the Engagement, Disengagement, and One More Scripts don’t work to get <student> re- engaged, visually prompt and say “schedule or break.” If <student> says schedule, return to the expected task and use the One More script as soon as needed to keep <student> engaged. If <student> says “break,” follow break protocol. If <student> says nothing or says schedule but continues to disengagement or has challenging behaviors, visually prompt and say “it’s time for a break” and follow break protocol. Break Protocol: If <student> chooses break or break is directed, show the break card and say “time for a break” and direct <student> to the break area. Once in the break area, disengage from all interaction. Do not respond to questions, comments, discussion, etc. After a designated time period (15 seconds to 1 minute), say and show the visual “schedule or break.” If <student> chooses to continue break, say “ok” and disengage again for the designated time period. Offer the choice of “schedule or break” each time within the designated time period. Default is always break so if <student> doesn’t choose schedule or break or tries to engage in a discussion or asks questions, show and say “you have chosen break” and follow the break protocol. If <student> chooses schedule, write down the expectations (mini-schedule) for returning to schedule and return to the schedule and the Engagement Script.

27 Corrections Exceed Affirmation

28 Concept or Clarification
Starting with person <…….> and moving in a clockwise rotation, answer ONE of the following questions: As a trainer, the concept that most resonated with me is _________________. The one question or clarification I still have is ________________. Once everyone has participated, the first person summarizes concepts and questions for report out.

29 Curriculum

30 Curriculum – Three Options
Autism Internet Modules Historically used Thorough content Ready to Use Developed for Professionals START P2P Curriculum Engaging Content Age Appropriate Aligned with AIM Modules Develop Your Own Tons of resources “out there” Can tailor to your specific needs Time consuming

31 Autism Internet Modules
Option #1 Autism Internet Modules (AIM)

32 Curriculum Levels Level 1 – Basic – 8 Modules (6th-12th Grade)
Level 2 – Intermediate – 9 Modules (6th-12th Grade) Level 3 – Advanced 1 – 11 Modules (9th-12th Grade) Level 4 – Advanced 2 – 10 Modules (9th-12th Grade)

33 Flexibility In the Curriculum
6th – 12th Grade Students in Different Grades at Same Level Entry Point - Level 1 – Basic Regardless of Grade of Peer to Peer Support Student 6th, 7th and 8th Graders – Level 3 and 4 with Permission Only On-Line or Direct Instruction

34

35 Specific Example A 12th Grade Peer to Peer Support Student in their 1st Semester of the program would enter the curriculum at Level 1 – Basic and may complete the following On-Line Modules: 1. About Autism Spectrum Disorder 2. Recognizing Autism – Assessment for Identification 3. Peer Mediated Instruction 4. Prompting 5. Reinforcement Restricted Patterns of Behavior Interests and Activities Many teachers are using the post-test of each module to help determine the grade for the class.

36 Specific Example Two 7th Grade Peer to Peer Support Students are in the same hour. Student A - 3rd Semester Student B - 1st Semester Student A is Level 2 – Intermediate – On-Line Student B is Level 1 – Basic – On-Line Teacher of record must track the level of each peer to peer support student in each class

37 START Online Curriculum
Option #2 START Online Curriculum Big Idea Accesses online course on own time (supports student during one hour) < 30 minutes per week Meets with Teacher of Record and/or Peer Coordinator monthly Case Conferences Live Lessons (PPTs developed)

38 Overview of START P2P Curriculum
Six Semesters of Content Developed Moodle/Google Classroom OR Face to Face

39 Overview of START P2P Curriculum (cont.)
Students learn through Videos Articles Websites Students are assessed via: Forum Journal entry Quizzes Final Project Teacher input surveys

40 Overview of START P2P Curriculum (cont.)
Syllabus Week by Week Lesson Plans All assignments Power Point Presentations for Face to Face Lessons One Pager “Expectations” explanations Teacher input forms for assessing LINK students Case Conference “Think Sheets” Grading Rubrics Data Collection tools; surveys

41 Week Title Content Assignments
SEMESTER ONE Week Title Content Assignments 1 Peer to Peer Overview – Your Role! Syllabus LINK Promises Video - Olivet Football Pretest 2 About Autism Spectrum Disorder Video – Just Like You – Autism 3 Peer Mediated Instruction Article – We Teach By Our Own Example Video – EUPISD LINKS 4 Interests, Activities, and Restricted Patterns of Behavior Video – Kick of Hope Article – Strengths and Challenges 5 Social Deficits Quick Read – Social Deficits 6 Article – Autism 7 Quick Read – Peer-isms Video – Jason McElwain 8 Language and Communication Video – I Am Carley Quick Read – Language and Communication

42 Semester At a Glance

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50 I want… Access to the Moodle Course?
Contact Jana Benjamin: Access to the Course Materials? START Website: gvsu.edu/autismcenter Peer to Peer Peer to Peer Online Course

51

52

53

54 What About The Curriculum for Other Disability Areas
Yea…START Has That

55 We simply eliminated the ASD specific information….
In year two of the direct instruction/online Moodle Course, we have covered all disability areas…

56

57 Peer to Peer Online/Hybrid Class Rationale
Increase Peer Programs Engaging Curriculum; Age Appropriate; Aligned with MDE Guidelines Provide rural districts with a highly qualified teacher of record Provide local districts with a “canned program” for their teacher of record.

58 Structure Elective Credit
Earn extra elective credit (LINKS) as well as the credit for the class that they are supporting the student in (math) Earn elective credit for the class that they are supporting the student in (LINKS) Weekly Online Content/Assignments Quick reads, videos, quizzes, journal reflections, forums Case Conferences with Building Coordinator Face to Face Lessons with Teacher of Record

59

60

61

62 Resources Within Program
Course Overview “one-pager” for Admin. Syllabus All reading content Assignments 3 Face to Face Lesson PowerPoints Building Coordinator Roles One-pager Classroom Teacher Expectations one-pager Teacher/Bldg. Coordinator Input Sheets Grading Rubric ….and much more

63 2015-2016 Targeted Schools Whitefish Township Rudyard Area Schools
Ojibwe Charter School Tahquamenon St. Ignace

64 START Data Collection Forms

65 START Data Collection - Elementary

66 START Data Collection - Secondary

67 General Education Building

68 Self Contained Special Ed Building

69 Peer to Peer Support Surveys

70 Student with ASD Survey

71 Pre - LINK Student Survey

72 Post LINK Student Survey

73 Pre – Parent of Student with ASD

74 Post Parent of Student with ASD

75 Pre – Parent of LINK Student

76 Post Parent of LINK Student

77 Parent Survey

78


Download ppt "1st Annual EPLI Trainer Day"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google