1. Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages 2992-3003 (November 2016)
NF1 Is a Direct G Protein Effector Essential for Opioid Signaling to Ras in the Striatum 
Keqiang Xie, Lesley A. Colgan, Maria T. Dao, Brian S. Muntean, Laurie P. Sutton, Cesare Orlandi, Sanford L. Boye, Shannon E. Boye, Chien-Cheng Shih, Yuqing Li, Baoji Xu, Roy G. Smith, Ryohei Yasuda, Kirill A. Martemyanov 
Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages (November 2016)
DOI: /j.cub
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
NF1 Is a Novel G Protein Effector Downstream from MORs Activation
(A) Schematic of the assay design to study membrane recruitment of NF1 in response to MOR activation. Association of NanoLuc-tagged NF1 with membrane-targeted Venus is expected to result in BRET signal.
(B) Real-time kinetics of BRET signal change upon NF1 plasma membrane recruitment. Arrow indicates time of morphine application.
(C) Quantification of maximal amplitude of BRET signals from three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey’s test.
(D) Schematic representation of NF1 domain composition and truncation mutants used in this study.
(E) Co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous NF1 with overexpressed Gβ1γ2 complex in transfected HEK293T cells.
(F) Co-immunoprecipitation of Sec14/PH module with Gβ1γ2 complex in transfected HEK293T cells.
(G) Mutual stabilization of Sec14/PH module and Gβ1γ2 upon co-expression in HEK293T cells.
(H) Direct interaction between purified recombinant Sec14/PH and Gβ1γ2 proteins studied in pull-down assays.
(I) (Upper) Schematic diagram of BRET strategy to study NF1-Gβγ interaction in living cells. (Lower) Analysis of Gβγ binding to NF1 constructs by titrating ratios of interacting partners is shown.
(J) Quantification of maximal BRET ratios generated by various NF1 constructs from three independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey’s test.
(K) (Upper) Schematic representation of the BRET assay monitoring interaction between Sec14/PH and Gβγ upon MORs activation and inactivation. (Lower) Real-time kinetics of BRET signal in response to changes in MOR activity is shown.
(L) Quantification of the dose-response relationship of Gβγ-NF1 interaction from three independent experiments. Gβγ scavenger GRK3ct blunted the BRET response between Sec14/PH module and Gβγ.
Data are represented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S1.
Current Biology  , DOI: ( /j.cub )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2 Gβγ Inhibits GAP Activity of NF1
(A) (Left) Diagram of single turnover principle of Ras GTP hydrolysis assay. (Right) Effects of recombinant Gβγ on NF1 fragment (GRD/Sec14/PH)-stimulated GTPase activity of N-Ras are shown.
(B) Quantification of the effect of Gβγ on GTPase activity of NF1.
(C) (Left) Diagram of multiple turnover of Ras GTP hydrolysis assay principle. The assay involves both GAP (NF1) and GEF (sos1). (Right) Both RasGEF and RasGAP are necessary for Ras GTP hydrolysis in the multiple turnover assay.
(D) Gβγ inhibits Ras GTP hydrolysis rate in dose-dependent manner with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for Gβγ of 0.187 ± 0.044 μM.
Data are represented as mean ± SEM.
Current Biology  , DOI: ( /j.cub )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
NF1 Is Essential for Ras Activation by MORs in Cultured Striatal MSNs
(A) Schematic of Ras FLIM-FRET sensor. Increase in binding between mGFP-RasGTP and mRFP-Raf-RBD upon Ras activation is measured as a decrease in GFP fluorescence lifetime and quantified as change in binding fraction.
(B) Representative fluorescence lifetime image of striatal MSNs before and 10 min after 10 μM morphine application. Warmer colors indicate decrease in lifetime, which corresponds to higher Ras activity.
(C) Average time course of Ras activation (change in binding fraction) of MSNs in response to 10 μM morphine application (black arrow). Average includes neurons that responded and those that showed no response to morphine.
(D) Morphine-induced Ras activation of individual MSNs.
(E) Schematic of conditional Nf1 ablation strategy in cultured MSNs. Cultured MSNs from neonatal Nf1flx/flx mice were infected with AAV-Cre to induce Nf1 elimination.
(F) Representative time course of Ras activation (change in binding fraction) in response to morphine application (black arrow) in wild-type (WT) (AAV-control) and Nf1 cKO (AAV-Cre) MSNs.
(G) Quantification of Ras response to morphine in control and Nf1 cKO (Cre) cultures. Unpaired t test; ∗p = 0.02; n = 26 and 15.
(H) Schematic of strategy to prevent Gβγ binding to NF1 by expressing the minimal binding module of NF1 (NF1-DN).
(I) Representative time course of Ras activation (change in binding fraction) in response to morphine application (black arrow) in control and NF1-DN-expressing MSNs.
(J) Quantification of Ras response to morphine in control and NF1-DN-expressing cultures. Unpaired t test; ∗∗p = 0.007; n = 19 and 18.
(K) Schematic outlining strategy for expression of Ras sensor in D1R- or D2R-expressing MSNs.
(L) Representative time course of Ras activation (change in binding fraction) in response to morphine application (black arrow) in D1R- and D2R-expressing MSNs.
(M) Quantification of Ras response to morphine in D1R- and D2R-expressing MSNs. Unpaired t test; ∗∗p = 0.007; n = 13 and 15.
Data are represented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S2.
Current Biology  , DOI: ( /j.cub )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Striatal NF1 Is Essential for Morphine-Induced Ras and Its Downstream Signaling Cascade Activation
(A) Generation of striatal-specific Nf1 knockout mice (Nf1 cKO) by crossing conditional NF1flx/flx line with MSNs-specific Rgs9-Cre line.
(B) Representative images of Nissl-stained coronal brain sections from control and Nf1 cKO mice. aca, anterior part of anterior commissure; NAc, nucleus accumbens; Stm, striatum (scale bar, 1 mm). We found average volumes of both dorsal striatum (16.4 ± 0.8 mm3 in Nf1 cKO versus 17.2 ± 0.3 mm3 in control littermates; n = 4 mice) and nucleus accumbens (1.4 ± 0.1 mm3 in Nf1 cKO versus 1.3 ± 0.1 mm3 in control littermates; n = 4 mice) to be unaffected by NF1 deletion.
(C) Impact of NF1 elimination on baseline Ras activation and signaling to downstream kinase pathways in striatum.
(D) Quantification of western blot data with activities normalized to samples from control mice. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗∗p < 0.01; Student’s t test.
(E) Schematic representation of Ras-ERK and Ras-Akt signaling. Ras is activated in response to both GPCRs and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), which in turn is able to activate both Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways. Activated Akt can further modulate GSK3 and mTOR activity. High level of ERK activity can result in decreased activity of Akt through cross-talk.
(F) Morphine-induced activation of Ras and its downstream pathway in striatum studied by western blotting. Mice were injected with 20 mg/kg morphine (subcutaneously [s.c.]) or saline, and their NAc regions were dissected 60 min after for active Ras pull-down as well as western blot analysis.
(G) Quantification of western blot data with activities normalized to vehicle-treated control of the same genotype. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; n = 3 mice per each treatment; Student’s t test.
See also Figure S3.
Current Biology  , DOI: ( /j.cub )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5 Striatal NF1 Regulates Psychomotor Responses to Morphine
(A) The effect of morphine administration on locomotor activity in control (left) and Nf1 cKO (right) mice in the open field task. Mice received saline or increasing doses of morphine (2, 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg, s.c.) and were immediately placed in the activity-recording chamber.
(B) Quantification of cumulative distance traveled in open–field chamber during 20–80 min following vehicle or morphine treatment. NF1 ablation in striatum results in blunted morphine-induced psychomotor activation. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; two-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey’s test (n = 8 mice per each group).
See also Figure S4.
Current Biology  , DOI: ( /j.cub )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 6
Disruption of MOR Signaling via NF1 in the Striatum Decreases Sensitivity to Morphine Reward
(A) Effect of striatal-specific deletion of NF1 (Nf1 cKO mice) on mouse performance in conditioned place preference (CPP) task. Mice were administered either saline (0 mg/kg morphine) or various concentrations of morphine as indicated. Place-preference scores are calculated as the time difference during post-conditioning between drug-paired side versus saline-paired side. ∗p < 0.05 in comparison between genotypes two-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey’s test (n = 6–10 each group).
(B) Effect of disrupting Gβγ-NF1 interaction in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) on morphine CPP. (Upper) Schematics of the conditional dominant-negative construct (AAV-NF1-DNFLEX) and its viral delivery into NAc of Rgs9-Cre mice are shown. (Lower) Performance of mice in the CPP task is shown. Mice were administered either saline or various concentrations of morphine as indicated. AAV-mediated expression of a dominant-negative NF1 construct that prevents Gβγ-NF1 interaction decreases sensitivity of mice to rewarding effects of morphine. The same AAV-NF1-DNFLEX virus was injected into either Rgs9-Cre(+) mice or their control littermates Rgs9-Cre(−). CPP experiments were conducted as in (A). ∗∗p < 0.01 in comparison between genotypes two-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey’s test (n = 5–6 each group).
(C) Animal performance in morphine self-administration task. Lever presses per session are plotted. Active (0.3 mg/kg/infusion) versus inactive levers showed significant (p < 0.01 and p < ) difference with both genotypes and within criteria. Genotype versus session (n = 5 per group) interaction p = 0.005; genotype p < ; session p < Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < genotype comparison per session; two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test.
(D) Dose-response dependence of drug taking in the self-administration task. Genotype versus dose (n = 5 per group) interaction p < ; genotype p < ; dose p < Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗∗∗p < genotype comparison; ###p < compared to saline for both genotypes; two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni test.
Current Biology  , DOI: ( /j.cub )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 7
Proposed Model for the Role of NF1 in Mediating MOR Signaling to Ras
NF1 is a novel Gβγ effector downstream from MORs activation and is essential for MORs-induced Ras pathway activation in MSNs.
Current Biology  , DOI: ( /j.cub )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions