Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement  Kevin Phan, BS(Adv), Ashleigh Xie, Marco Di Eusanio,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement  Kevin Phan, BS(Adv), Ashleigh Xie, Marco Di Eusanio,"— Presentation transcript:

1 A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement 
Kevin Phan, BS(Adv), Ashleigh Xie, Marco Di Eusanio, MD, PhD, Tristan D. Yan, MBBS, PhD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014) DOI: /j.athoracsur Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Search strategy of meta-analysis of minimally invasive vs conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR). (TAVI = transcatheter aortic valve implantation.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3 Fig 2 Perioperative mortality in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) vs conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). (M-H = Mantel-Haenszel test.) The solid squares denote the risk ratio and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The solid vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond denotes the weighted risk ratio, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CIs). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CIs. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4 Fig 3 Cumulative perioperative mortality in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) vs conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). The solid squares denote the cumulative risk ratio and are proportional to the weights used in meta-analysis. The solid vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond denotes the weighted mean risk ratio, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CIs). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CIs. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

5 Fig 4 Neurologic events in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) vs conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). (M-H = Mantel-Haenszel test.) The solid squares denote the risk ratio and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The solid vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond denotes the weighted risk ratio, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CIs). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CIs. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

6 Fig 5 Sternal/wound complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) vs conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). (M-H = Mantel-Haenszel test.) The solid squares denote the risk ratio and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The solid vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond denotes the weighted risk ratio, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CIs). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CIs. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

7 Fig 6 Pain scores in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) vs conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). (IV = inverse variance; SD = standard deviation.) The solid squares denote the mean difference and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The solid vertical line indicates no effect. The diamond denotes the weighted mean difference, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated confidence intervals (CIs). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CIs. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement  Kevin Phan, BS(Adv), Ashleigh Xie, Marco Di Eusanio,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google