1. doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#>
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2004
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [Conditional Approval for REVa]
Date Submitted: [The date the document is contributed, in the format “21 May, 1999”]
Source: [Tom Siep] Company [TMS Consulting]
Address [Suite 100, ms 365, 1802 Pleasant Valley Dr, Garland, TX, USA, 75040]
Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ],
Re: [Original]
Abstract: [Request to 802 SEC for Conditional Approval]
Purpose: [Invoke Procedure 10 for REVa]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
Tom Siep, TMS Consulting
Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

2. Procedure 10 for 802.15REVa Letter Ballot Began
March 2004
Procedure 10 for REVa
Letter Ballot Began
January 12, 2004 at 1800 EST
Letter Ballot Ended
February 13, 2004 at 2300 EST
Vote talley (Yes/No/Abstain)
115/2/33 – 98%
# Tech comments 4
# Unresolved Tech comments
1 – pending possible resolution (see next slide)
Estimated Start Recirculation
1 Apr 04 (10 Day)
Estimated Start Sponsor Ballot
15 Apr 04
Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

3. doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#>
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2004
to David Cypher
Hello David,
The comment resolution team has accepted and will apply all of your remedies with the exception of the last one:
Start a new letter ballot that is nothing more than the following statement: "Do you approve the Bluetooth Specification 1.2 "as is" to be forwarded to IEEE 802 for approval as an IEEE Standard?“
The comment resolution team respectfully requests you to withdraw this particular comment. We believe the suggested remedy to be infeasible.
Please advise if you accept this resolution and therefore can turn your "no" vote to a "yes", conditional upon acceptable application of your remaining remedies.
{DAVID DECLINED TO RECIND HIS REMAINING OUTSTANDING COMMENT}
Tom Siep, TMS Consulting
Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

4. Motion within the Working Group
March 2004
Motion within the Working Group
The Working Group approves forwarding Draft 4 of REVa to the EC for Conditional Approval under the Procedure 10 rules of the LMSC
Moved: Tom Siep
Seconded: John Barr
39 for, 0 no, 6 abstain
Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

5. March 2004
Motion
Move to forward Draft 4 of REVa to the Sponsor Ballot under the Procedure 10 rules of the LMSC
Moved: Heile
Seconded: Upton
Tom Siep, TMS Consulting