Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Construction Law | Dispute Resolution | Procurement | Training

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Construction Law | Dispute Resolution | Procurement | Training"— Presentation transcript:

1 Construction Law | Dispute Resolution | Procurement | Training
Dealing with Delay: The Do’s and Don’ts London +44 (0) Dublin +353 (0) Belfast +44 (0) Maidstone +44 (0) Quigg Golden

2 Here Today William Brown BEng (Hons) MSc CLCM MIEI ACIArb GMICE
Senior Associate William Brown Admiral_Brown

3 Agenda Dealing with Delay The Different Types of Delay
How RIAI/PWC Deal with Delay Making up for Lost Time

4 Same S#*t Different Project
Time Cost Quality

5 Welcome to Construction
The Perpetual Cycle Welcome to Construction

6 The Different Types of Delay

7 The Different Types of Delay
Excusable delay Time only Time and money Non-excusable delay Concurrent delay Non-critical delay Discretely Defined Loosely Defined 13(+4) Time + Money Events 4(+4) Time Only Events 5 Time + Money Events 5 Time Only Events

8 Demolition Substructure Superstructure Commissioning Landscaping
Completion Date Resources

9 Time & Money Event Time Only Event ?? Demolition Substructure
Superstructure Commissioning Landscaping Completion Date 4m EOT Abortive Costs Disruption Loss of Productiv. Standing Time OHP Resources ??

10 Non-Critical Delay Demolition Substructure Superstructure
Commissioning Landscaping Completion Date Busier site = prelims thickening Resources

11 Disruption Demolition Substructure Superstructure Commissioning
Loss of productivity Commissioning Landscaping De-mob Re-mob De-mob De-mob Completion Date Extra Trade Interfaces Busier site = prelims thickening Resources

12 What Does the Contract Say?

13 Dealing with Delay – RIAI
Clause 30 (a)-(j) = 10 events that give rise to EOT Only 5 give rise to additional money as well (b) = delay in giving possession (clause 28) (f) = Architects Instructions (clause 2) (g) = Late instruction from Architect (i) = Delay by others engaged by Employer (j) = Employer’s act of default (clause 29)

14 Dealing with Delay – RIAI
(b) = delay in giving possession (clause 28) “Contractor shall be entitled to receive from the Employer compensation for any loss incurred due to dislocation of the Contractor’s organisation” Burden of proof? … we will return to what “loss” means

15 Dealing with Delay – RIAI
(f) = Architects Instructions (clause 2) Clause 2(a)-(i) lists 9 types of Architect Instruction Clause 2(a) = Variation = Ascertained under Clause 13 Otherwise, ascertained via loss or expense Variations = Clause 13 All other AI’s = Loss or Expense

16 Dealing with Delay – RIAI
(f) = Architects Instructions (clause 2) Clause 13 = the valuation rules for Variation If character/conditions of work is similar = BOQ rate If character/conditions of work is NOT similar = BOQ rate with reasonable adjustment If a reasonable adjustment cannot be made = Fair Valuation If the measures above don’t work = Daywork Prices

17 One of my favourite cases…
Henry Boot v Alstom Combined Cycles 1999 Discusses the use of BOQ rates Good definition of “Fair Valuation” “the contract rates and prices are sacrosanct... immutable… even if too profitable or uneconomic”

18 One of my favourite cases…
Henry Boot v Alstom Combined Cycles 1999 Discusses the use of BOQ rates Good definition of “Fair Valuation” “A fair valuation means… actual costs reasonably and necessarily incurred plus OHP”

19 Dealing with Delay – RIAI
(j) = Employer’s act of default (clause 29) “If any act of the Employer delays progress of the Works… the Employer shall pay or allow to the Contractor such damages as the Contractor shall have incurred by the delay” Notify with in 5 days… or… Act of default? What damages are recoverable?

20 “Loss” “Expense” “Damages”
“loss and expense” = common law damages = Wraight v PHT 1968 Interest is payable on a loss and expense claim = FG Minter v Welsh 1981 Can include head office overheads = Tate & Lyle v GLC 1982 Loss of profit, if you can prove it = Peak Construction V McKinney 1971 CASE LAW WARNING

21 Lets take a trip through time…
Hadley v Baxensale 1854 Victoria Laundry v Newman 1949 Damages Naturally Arising “Special” Damages

22 Dealing with Delay – PWC
Clause 9.4 – Programme Contingency A complicated mechanism Two thresholds (look at Schedule 1K) Contractors should programme it in Deemed to be included

23 Dealing with Delay – PWC
Threshold 1 Threshold 2 Full EOT Half EOT No EOT

24 Dealing with Delay – PWC
Clause 10.3 – Contractor Claims CONDITION PRECEDENT Notify within 20 Working Days Give further particulars Clause 10.7 – Delay Cost Expenses incurred; OR Daily rate of delay cost in Schedule 2D

25

26 A Mantra to Live by… Max Abrahamson, Engineering Law and the ICE Contracts, 4th Edition: “A party to a dispute… will learn three lessons (often too late): the importance of records, the importance of records and the importance of records. It is impossible to exaggerate the extent to which lawyers can find unexpected grounds, often quite real, on which to cast doubt on evidence if it is not backed up by meticulously established records”

27 Tips for Practice Records, Records, Records
Contractors need to prove that: The delay event occurred The contract permits you to claim for that event The notices required by the contract have been given What the effect of the event was Planned v Actual

28 EOT under JCT William’s

29 William’s Top Tips Read your contract and highlight
“Time only” delay events “Time and money” delay events Notification requirements Ensure site team understands the importance of notifying Records, Records, Records Don’t scramble your eggs… Lack of Access Change Order Your delay claim

30 Construction Law | Dispute Resolution | Procurement | Training
Thank you Please keep in touch William Brown Admiral_Brown London +44 (0) Dublin +353 (0) Belfast +44 (0) Maidstone +44 (0) Quigg Golden


Download ppt "Construction Law | Dispute Resolution | Procurement | Training"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google