1. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A general defect in the vasculature with focal manifestations in the abdominal aorta? 
Björn Sonesson, MD, PhD, Flemming Hansen, MD, Toste Länne, MD, PhD 
Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
DOI: /S (97)70185-X
Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Stiffness (β) of abdominal aortic aneurysms in men (A) and women (B) compared with normal aorta in reference population. Solid line represents mean, and dotted lines represent upper and lower 95% CI for reference population. Stiffness of aneurysm was increased in both men and women (p = ), respectively.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (97)70185-X)
Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 1
Stiffness (β) of abdominal aortic aneurysms in men (A) and women (B) compared with normal aorta in reference population. Solid line represents mean, and dotted lines represent upper and lower 95% CI for reference population. Stiffness of aneurysm was increased in both men and women (p = ), respectively.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (97)70185-X)
Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 2
Stiffness (β) in common carotid artery in men (A) and in women (B) with AAAs compared with normal common carotid artery in reference population. Solid line represents mean, and dotted lines represent upper and lower 95% CI for reference population. Stiffness was increased in both men (p = ) and women (p = ).
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (97)70185-X)
Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 2
Stiffness (β) in common carotid artery in men (A) and in women (B) with AAAs compared with normal common carotid artery in reference population. Solid line represents mean, and dotted lines represent upper and lower 95% CI for reference population. Stiffness was increased in both men (p = ) and women (p = ).
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (97)70185-X)
Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 3
Diameter of common carotid artery in men (A) and women (B) with AAAs compared with normal common carotid artery. Solid line represents mean, and dotted lines represent upper and lower 95% CI for reference population. Diameter was essentially unaltered in men (p = ). In women, diameter was slightly increased, but if adjusted for difference in blood pressure increase is not significant (p = ).
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (97)70185-X)
Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 3
Diameter of common carotid artery in men (A) and women (B) with AAAs compared with normal common carotid artery. Solid line represents mean, and dotted lines represent upper and lower 95% CI for reference population. Diameter was essentially unaltered in men (p = ). In women, diameter was slightly increased, but if adjusted for difference in blood pressure increase is not significant (p = ).
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( /S (97)70185-X)
Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions