1. Review MOSH products and methodologies
Towards a Common Understanding

2. Background
Previous reviews recap - routinely examining how the process was being applied and how it can be improved
Use of standardized FRAMEWORKS in understanding the process (Methodology & Product) – For Once!
Answer Key Questions
How can we do this better?
Why do we do this at all?
Is there a completely different way?

3. Background IPO MAP Upgrade to Move to SIPOC Inputs
Process/ Translation
Outputs
Upgrade to Move to SIPOC

4. Transforming Resources Learning Hub secretariat
SUPPLIERS
INPUT
PROCESS
OUTPUTS
CUSTOMERS
Transforming Resources
Potential Leading Practices
Occupational Health and Safety Statistics
Key Learnings from the previously adopted Leading practices
Leading practices in the Dust, Noise, Falls of Ground and Transport and Machinery focus areas - Product
Shared learning - Service
Leading Adoption Monitors
Lives - Product
Saved
Safe mines- Product
Mining Houses
Mine Industry & Adoption Teams
Organised Labour
Mining Industry Experts
Research Institutions
Universities
MOSH Leading Practice Adoption System
Identify Leading practices
Document leading Practices
Widespread adoption of leading practices
Mining Industry
Mine Workers
Learning Hub secretariat

5. Performance Objectives
Quality
Cost
Speed
Dependability
Flexibility
Compare Market expectations with the service provider

6. Quality Speed Dependability Flexibility Cost
Quick response times to Mining Industry needs (leading practice)
Minimise the time between a mining house enquiring for a Leading Practice and the Mine House getting assistance from the Learning Hub
Identified/ potential Leading practice much go through the MOSH Leading Practice Adoption system faster
Keeping delivery promises that have been made (both for Mines and Learning Hub)
Keeping the Mines informed about Leading Practice Adoption rate
Products and services are of value to Chamber of Mines members
Doing things cheaply
High accuracy of Leadership Behaviour and Behaviour Communication Plans
Identification of Leading Practice that are in the higher hierarchy of controls
Following the Leading Practice Adoption Guides
High accuracy of Information from the Mines
Customising the MOSH Leading practices for individual Mines (operations)

7. Click to add Title Quality
Importance Performance Objective – Learning Hub
Importance Performance Objective – Mining Industry
Cost
Speed
Flexibility
Dependability

8. Proposal
Review our Methodologies – emphasis should be on trading off between Quality and Flexibility
How?
You will get the discussion document/ plan
Still need to do the unpacking of the products
Always keep these Questions
How can we do this better?
Why do we do this at all?
Is there a completely different way?

9. What has Happened Received feedback from SOME of you
Mostly it was on grammar not on the way forward
Important Considerations to Look at are:
Process Change Issues to consider
What does our stakeholders REALLY say about our products and Methodologies?
How much should be repeated for subsequent leading practices?
Risk analysis - Risk stories and expert models - per risk area or everything at once?

10. Proposal Process Change Issues to consider
Direct Enquiries - 1x professional one during demonstration/ 1st adopter and none during wide spread adoption?
Behavioral communication plan - 1x professional one funded by LH during demonstration/ 1st adopter and none during wide spread adoption?
Behavioral communication material 1x professional one during demonstration/ 1st adopter funded by LH and made available to all adopter mines for free?

11. Proposal Process Change Issues to consider
Leading Practice lesson plans 1x professional one during demonstration/ 1st adopter funded by LH and made available to all adopter mines for free.
Leadership Behaviour - Separate Leading Practice or part of Leading Practices?
Leadership Behaviour plan- 1x professional one during demonstration/ 1st adopter funded by LH and made available to all adopter mines for free.
Leadership Behaviour communication material: 1x professional one during demonstration/ 1st adopter funded by LH and made available to all adopter mines for free.

12. Proposal Process Change Issues to consider
Company level wide spread adoption plans, with annual windows ?
Incorporation of CTF Pillar 4 elements into methodology - Yes or no
M&E framework - What do we want to measure and why?
How do we ensure quality Learning Hub outputs?
How do we ensure quality execution of wide spread adoption by mines?

13. Proposal Process Change Issues to consider
What is the Critical Path and Critical elements of the MOSH process
What are the Key Products and Services and for Who?

14. Proposal
Review our Methodologies – emphasis should be on trading off between Quality and Flexibility
How?
You will get the discussion document/ plan
Still need to do the unpacking of the products
Always keep these Questions
How can we do this better?
Why do we do this at all?
Is there a completely different way?